US won’t permit interim agreement

By Ted Belman

Newswise, there is not much to report today.  But one thing I found of interest.  Abbas met with members of Meretz and most online news sources reported it. Everyone had a different takeaway.

For me the most interesting thing is that Israel is in no hurry and is slowing the pace of negotiations. She has also barred the US from being present. I didn’t she had the right.

But WAFA reports:

    Abed Rabbo said the Americans did not participate in the talks “due to an
    Israeli stance and demand,” adding that “this is one sign of how and where
    the talks are heading if the US is not able now to assert itself in the
    peace process.


Finally the US has guaranteed that she would not allow for any interim solutions before a final status agreement is signed. Very interesting. I thought Israel wanted an interim agreement and I was worried that she would agree to abandon many settlements.

INN had this to say:

    Members of Meretz said that Abbas told them a “fair agreement” will end the conflict with Israel and that a “peace agreement with Israel will be final and binding.” He did not, however, specify what is meant by a fair peace agreement and did not commit to the fact that PA would give up its demand for the “right of return”.

    He added that he believes all obstacles to peace could be overcome and resolved within six months, though he said that at this point there was little progress in the talks. Abbas made it clear, however, that he would not agree to temporary borders and would only sign an agreement that would allow the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state alongside Israel.

    The PA chairman criticized Israel’s behavior around the resumption of negotiations, saying, according to Channel 2, “I wanted there to be daily meetings or at most every two days, because our time is limited, but Israel refused.” He also claimed that Israel had refused to allow active American involvement in the discussions.

    Abbas expressed disappointment at the fact that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has not met with him and told the Meretz members that he sent Netanyahu a message several times, indicating his readiness to meet with him face to face, as he had done with former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert (whooffered Abbas an unprecedented offer to which Abbas has yet to respond).

    The meeting between Abbas and the Meretz members comes several days after the latest meeting between Israeli and PA negotiators, as part of the current round of peace talks.

    So far, details of the discussions between the sides have not been revealed, apparently consistent with a request from Washington last week for a strict news blackout.

    At the same time, the PA’s chief negotiator Saeb Erekat  revealed, in an interview with the Nazareth-based Arabic language A-Shams radio station on Tuesday, that the PA would not have returned to the negotiating table with Israel had it not received a letter of assurances from the United States, guaranteeing its main negotiating preconditions.

    Erekat said in the interview that the U.S. had assured the PA in writing that talks would recognize the indefensible pre-1967 borders as the basis of a Palestinian state, would deal with all core issues (Jerusalem, refugees, borders, security and water), would take place within six  to nine months and would not allow for any interim solutions before a final status agreement is signed.

August 23, 2013 | 2 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

2 Comments / 2 Comments

  1. The Pal have published their red lines for all of the world to know. After using women and children as shield, now the Pal use the US as a shield against IL.
    If Israel does not concede it will be IL fault.
    IL will not concede.
    So be it.
    The Pal MO is and always will be deception (taqiyya).

  2. The Arabs are not interested in peace. Their main concern is to avoid being blamed for the breakdown of the talks and at the same they time they do not want to be put in a position where they have to reject a peace deal they don’t want. If they can find a way not to have to say “yes” to an Israeli offer, then they will in all likelihood escape the blame for the talks going nowhere. Nothing indicates the Arabs are ready for peace or are willing to do the hard work to get an agreement in the next six to nine months. Blaming Israel is part of their strategy to ensure that ANY peace deal is impossible and then Hamas is not in the picture.