WARMONGERS: Democrat and Their Media Lapdogs Rabid Over Russia Peace Talks

Peloni:  Not just Democrats…the entire Washington establishment supports this war continuing.

By – on

President Donald J. Trump welcomes Russian President Vladimir Putin to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Anchorage, Alaska, August 15, 2025 (By Benjamin D Applebaum – This image was released by the United States Department of Defense with the ID 250815-D-LS763-1028 (next).This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. Public Domain, Wikipedia)

The party of war is apoplectic over the prospect of peace between Russia and Ukraine. The meeting was preliminary and productive, but it is soon to assess how formative it will be for an end to the war that Trump is pushing for. Roger Kimball: Trump said that he would rank their discussion as very good—”10 out of 10,” he said. He and Putin came to an agreement about a lot of issues. Some issues remained.

“There’s no deal until there’s a deal,” Trump acknowledged when the summit concluded. “I will call up NATO in a little while. I will call up the various people that I think are appropriate, and I’ll, of course, call up President Zelensky and tell him about today’s meeting. It’s ultimately up to them.” For his part, Putin said he could “confirm” the contention that, had Trump been president in 2022, Russia would not have invaded Ukraine. What should we make of that? Within hours of the summit, it was being reported that President Zelensky would be coming back to meet with Trump in the Oval Office on Monday. Memo to Zelensky: “Russia is a very big power, and they’re not.” Perhaps the biggest policy desideratum to issue from the Trump-Putin summit was a change from “ceasefire” to “peace.” “It was determined by all,” Trump posted on Truth Social, “that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often times do not hold up” (American Greatness).

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff was more bullish than much of what was covered in our elite outlets: Politico: Special envoy Steve Witkoff says the White House extracted critical wins from its Friday summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, even as President Donald Trump failed to walk away with the ceasefire he was loudly advocated for. Security guarantees offering Ukraine “Article 5-like protections” are the real prize, Witkoff told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday. They’re “game-changing,” he said. “We didn’t think that we were anywhere close to agreeing to Article Five protection from the United States in legislative enshrinement within the Russian Federation, not to go after any other territory when the peace deal is codified,” Witkoff said on CNN’s “State of the Union” (Politico).

An immediate indicator of a least a measure of success for the recent engagement with the principals in Russia’s war against Ukraine is the fact the key players are both coming to the table. Ukrainian President Zelensky will visit the White House today, joined by other European leaders invited by the White House: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Axios).

Zelensky, for his part, is—very justifiably in light of his country’s experience with Putin—concerned about security guarantees. Wall Street Journal: “It’s very important that you are with us and that we speak to America together,” Zelensky said in Brussels, standing alongside von der Leyen. “It’s crucial that Europe is as united now as it was at the very beginning—as it was in 2022,” when Russia staged its large-scale invasion of Ukraine, Zelensky said. “This unity really helps encourage real peace, and it must stay strong.” Zelensky also thanked Trump for saying in recent conversations with European leaders that he was open to providing security guarantees to Ukraine. “For everyone in Europe this is a significant change, but there are no details how it would work and what America’s role will be, what Europe’s role will be, what the EU can do,” Zelensky said. “This is our main task: We need security to work in practice.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that a major focus of the Monday talks will be security guarantees, including the role the U.S. might potentially play (Wall Street Journal).

Key talents on the Sunday morning shows were pushing the line that the European leaders were showing up today at the White House so that Zelensky wouldn’t get “bullied.” Rubio pushed back: “This is such a stupid media narrative.” Daily Mail: Secretary of State Marco Rubio took on the mainstream media Sunday during a slew of appearances following President Trump’s bilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rubio sparred with CBS host Margaret Brennan as she pushed him to divulge details about Trump’s meeting with Putin, which took place in Alaska on Friday, as well as the forthcoming White House meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy. This is such a stupid media narrative that [European leaders] are coming here tomorrow because Trump is going to bully Zelensky into a bad deal. We’ve been working with these people for weeks… We invited them to come,’ Rubio told Brennan. ‘To have a deal … to reach the end of this conflict, both sides are going to have to make concessions,’ Rubio said of the agreement America is working to broker between Russia and Ukraine (Daily Mail).

Rubio, who made appearances across the Sunday political show lineup, told ABC’s Martha Raddatz a ceasefire was not the aim, arguing, “You’re not going to reach a ceasefire or peace agreement in a meeting” without Ukraine present. If an agreement isn’t reached, Rubio said, there will be consequences — but he emphasized the administration is trying to avoid such measures. Late last month, Trump threatened to shorten Putin’s deadline to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face heavy sanctions, which he said would include “secondary sanctions and tariffs.” Rubio on Sunday argued that if the U.S. levies additional sanctions, the “talking stops.” “If this morning the president woke up and said, ‘I’m putting these terrible … strong sanctions on Russia,’ that’s fine — [it] may make people feel good for a couple hours,” he said on Fox’s “Sunday Morning Futures.” “But here’s what you’re basically saying … talks are over for the foreseeable future” (Axios).

Trump responded and was was focused—most immediately—on Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy who said “Putin got everything he wanted” (Murphy).

The very unattractive (both inside and out!) Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy, said “Putin got everything that he wanted.” Actually, “nobody got anything,” too soon, but getting close. Murphy is a lightweight who thinks it made the Russian President look good in coming to America. Actually, it was very hard for President Putin to do so. This war can be ended, NOW, but stupid people like Chris Murphy, John Bolton, and others, make it much harder to do so (Truth).

August 18, 2025 | 19 Comments »

Leave a Reply

19 Comments / 19 Comments

  1. AI Overview

    +13
    Ukraine generally aligns its position on Israeli settlements, including those in the E1 area, with the majority of the international community. This stance considers such construction as a violation of international law and a major obstacle to the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
    More specifically, Ukraine’s position has been demonstrated through:
    Voting at the UN: Ukraine has voted in favor of UN Security Council resolutions condemning Israeli settlement activities, notably Resolution 2334 in 2016 which declared settlements as having “no legal validity”. While this resulted in a diplomatic spat with Israel, Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry defended its vote, citing its consistent advocacy for the respect of international law.
    Support for a two-state solution: Ukrainian officials have consistently voiced their support for a two-state solution, with Israel and Palestine existing side-by-side in peace and security.
    Condemnation of E1 Construction Plans: Ukraine has been among the nations to condemn recent Israeli decisions to advance construction plans in the E1 area, seeing it as further undermining the two-state solution and violating international law. In August 2025, Ukraine joined 21 other nations in a statement condemning Israel’s decision to approve settlement construction in the E1 area, saying the move was “unacceptable and a violation of international law”. The statement urged Israel to abandon the project immediately, in line with UN Security Council Resolution 2334, which calls for an end to settlement construction in occupied territories.
    It’s important to note that while Ukraine has expressed support for Palestine and condemned Israeli settlements, its relationship with Israel is complex and also encompasses cooperation in other areas.

    “People also ask
    What is the Ukraine stance on Gaza?
    During the Gaza war, Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry condemned attacks on Palestinian civilians in Gaza and supported a two-state solution to the conflict. More than 300 Ukrainian scholars, activists and artists expressed solidarity with Palestinians in an open letter.
    https://en.wikipedia.org
    Palestine–Ukraine relations – Wikipedia”

    Same as Russia, the EU, the U.N.

    Only the United States of America led by Trump stands with Israel. For now, anyway.

  2. How many wars has President Trump really ended?
    1 day ago

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y3599gx4qo

    Spoiler alert: 7, in this term which is all the article discusses. In his first term, he defeated ISIS, eliminated Soleimani and Baghdadi and brokered the Abraham Accords with Kushner and Bibi Netanyahu.

    He’s been in office how many months?.

    “The latest group supporting Trump’s desire for a Nobel Peace Prize? Cambodian monks

    USA TODAY

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/08/21/cambodian-monks-trump/85754734007/

  3. “Forty Years?
    Debunking the latest claptrap on American policy and Israeli settlements
    BY
    LIEL LEIBOVITZ
    NOVEMBER 21, 2019

    “…, “Settlements are Illegal” was U.S. policy for, at best, ten years: Eight under Obama, and two under Carter. That’s not a monolithic stretch lasting four decades; that’s just two left-wing Democrats breaking with established bi-partisan consensus for, at most, ten out of the past 40 years.

    You’re free to like President Trump or dislike him. You’re free to consider his latest Middle East policy move to be a welcome bit of truth-telling, or a political maneuver to help Bibi, or a rash and potentially ruinous bit of grandstanding aimed at evangelical voters in the US. But one thing is abundantly clear: By promoting the false narrative about the president reversing 40 years of American policy, it is Trump’s credulous critics who are using their ignorance of history to push a radical viewpoint that was widely and repeatedly rejected by actual US policy makers for the vast majority of the past four decades.”

    https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/forty-years

  4. We will not interfere; it would be strange to prevent people from living in certain places
    US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, on the resumption of construction in the E1 area: “It would be very strange to say that others can live in this area, but Israelis cannot”

    We will not dictate to Israel what to do, we will not interfere in the running of the country. It would be very strange to say that others can live in this area but Israelis cannot,” Huckabee said in an interview with Galei Tzahal (IDF Radio).

    The US State Department similarly said that the construction of Jewish houses in E1 supports Israel’s security and is in line with the administration’s goals.

    https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/413444

    AI Overview

    +5
    Recent sources do not contain any official statements specifically addressing E1 construction from Russia. However, Russia’s broader foreign policy positions and actions may offer insights:
    Past condemnation of Israeli settlements: Historically, Russia has been critical of Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank, viewing it as illegal under international law and an obstacle to the two-state solution.
    Support for a two-state solution: Russia has consistently advocated for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which envisions an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, according to Reuters.
    Recent diplomatic efforts and statements: In recent months, there have been diplomatic discussions and joint statements condemning Israel’s settlement plans by other nations, though Russia was not explicitly mentioned as a signatory in recent reports.
    While there are no specific recent statements regarding Russia’s stance on the E1 construction project, its historical opposition to settlement expansion and its continued support for a two-state solution suggest it would likely remain critical of such developments, according to The Times of India.

  5. Russia condemns Israeli plans to expand its military operations in Gaza
    If Israel’s plan succeeds, there will not be a single civilian left in Gaza, warns Russian Foreign Ministry

    “…”Russia reaffirms its consistent position on the need for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, release of all hostages and detainees, as well as restoration of unhindered humanitarian access,” it stressed.

    Moscow emphasized that resolving the Palestinian issue is only possible on the established international legal basis, centered on the two-state principle, which envisions the creation of an independent Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, coexisting peacefully and securely alongside Israel.”

    Huckabee: Palestinian state is not a priority for Trump
    In an interview with Al Arabiya English, US Ambassador Mike Huckabee says a Palestinian state isn’t a Trump priority. He criticizes the PA and EU, defends Israel’s Gaza offensive, and declares Hamas has no future.
    Israel National News
    Israel National News
    Aug 22, 2025 at 12:16 AM (GMT+3

    https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/413671

    “Asked about Smotrich’s statement that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump had agreed to the revival of the so-called E1 development, a spokesperson for the US State Department said the US remained focused on ending the war in Gaza and ensuring Hamas will never govern that territory again.

    “A stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration’s goal to achieve peace in the region,” the spokesperson said, while referring to the Israeli government for further information.”

    https://www.jpost.com/international/article-864264

    Sorry folks, my money’s on Trump.

  6. Foreign travel advice Ukraine….Martial law is in place…If you are a dual British-Ukrainian national or you have the right to reside in the UK, and want to leave Ukraine, contact the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine on adpsu@dpsu.gov.ua for advice.

    Ukrainian national and dual-national males aged 18 to 60 are prohibited from leaving the country. Dual-nationals have to comply to the same military conscription laws as Ukrainian mono-nationals.

    Even if you do not consider Ukrainian to be your primary nationality, the Ukrainian authorities may see you as a Ukrainian national: for example, if you have a Ukrainian parent, or if you were born in Ukraine…British nationals fighting in Ukraine

    If you travel to Ukraine to fight, or to assist others engaged in the war, your activities may amount to offences under UK legislation. You could be prosecuted on your return to the UK.

    Since 18 May 2024, British nationals who join the International Legion or Ukraine Armed Forces have to serve at least six months and are not allowed to leave Ukraine during this period.

    British nationals fighting in Ukraine have been killed or captured. British nationals undertaking humanitarian work have also been detained by Russian authorities. The risk to life, or of maltreatment, is high.

    The British Government’s ability to support you in these circumstances is very limited. It cannot facilitate your departure from Ukraine, your medical repatriation, or termination of your military contract. Find out more about FCDO consular assistance…Support from the UK government ?

    We continue to advise British nationals in regions where FCDO advises against all travel, to leave these areas, if they judge it safe to do so.

    The British Embassy in Kyiv is unable to help you in person. FCDO cannot facilitate your departure from Ukraine or your evacuation.

    https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/ukraine

  7. Peloni
    The matter of Global Warming of the planet is not closed. It exists in the science of Fourier, Foote and CONCLUSIVELY John Tyndall. Your position on this is ghastly and is a betrayal of the great Jewish heritage and their contribution to humanity. The statement of you and others that it is settled is funny if it wasn’t so serious..I am charging you and others as engaging in a weird form of censorship. I use the term deliberately.

    Going on my memories that denial of global warming of the planet would not have happened under direction of Joseph Alexander Norland who was the founder of Israpundit

  8. Peloni it is close to me but it is not dear to me. I hate it all of it.

    Please say what you are in disagreement with.

    To answer imho you must go back to basics to the scientific PIONEERS

    To Joseph Fourier, to Eunice Foote, and to the Irish physicist John Tyndall

    Resp. 1824, 1856 and 1859

    • @fquigley
      I honestly don’t have the interest to go back to arguing the basics on Climategate, a subject which I see as being beyond human control or impact, even if it exists as a threat at all, which remains dubious IMO.

      There are, in fact, far more relevant subjects which face Israel and the world today than does this subject, so I won’t invest myself into arguing the details of this subject with you other than to respectively note that we do not agree upon its veracity, likely in any way.

      Of course, you should feel free to comment further on this topic, and perhaps others will take your comment to heart, or argue with you further on this well worn tract of conversation which has been held here on this sight on this topic over the years.

      To be honest, while you continue to raise this as a subject of discussion, it is well laid to rest in my mind.

    • @Laura
      So while Putin is accepting the calls for peace, all of Europe calls for continuing the war without any chance of winning it? If Putin is the warmonger in this scenario, what are the Europeans? Peacemakers??

      • Peloni that’s right.

        However it is phrased Russia was tricked or provoked into the SMO.

        Plus there was no Trotskyist presence to challenge the Czarist nonsense of Putin – to unite the Ukraine against Nazism.

        The people of Europe have different things on their minds especially the south. The summer tourism model will end, and is ending… cannot go out with the beating sun. That becomes silly. It’s no holiday. The famous Mar Menor and the whole Mediterranean is becoming a giant fish kill…too hot for life…they just die.

        Doctors are realising…Life both human and animal exists inside of very narrow temperature boundaries.

        And Antisemitism attacks harmless Jews as the scapegoat which defines these “sages” like Mearsheimer and his pets The Palestinians

        All of this passes the Zionism by who remain unaware of these things as they write their insulation articles of Zionism… but the real physical world cannot be avoided.

        • @fquigley

          Doctors are realising…Life both human and animal exists inside of very narrow temperature boundaries.

          Sorry. I know this topic is dear to you, but we will never agree on the Climate Hoax.

        • Laura is right. Russia initiated an aggressive war against Ukraine in order to annex it against the will of her people. I call it nation-rape. The Putinists use exactly the same arguments that the “America First” movement used to justify appeasement of Nazi Germany, before the bombing of Pearl Harbor and Hitler’s declaration of war. The America Firsters, like todays Putinists, accused the people who wanted America to assist the countries that were being attacked by Germany and Japan of being against peace. In both cases, this accusation was and is unfair, because there is no real peace when armed aggression by a major power goes unpunished.