A report from an Indiana life insurance company raises serious concerns.
A seasoned stock analyst colleague texted me a link today, and when I clicked it open, I could hardly believe what I was reading. What a headline. “Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64”. This headline is a nuclear truth bomb masquerading as an insurance agent’s dry manila envelope full of actuarial tables.
People frequently write to Jill and myself. People we have never met. They call, they arrive at the farm by appointment or unannounced, they fill our email in boxes with their inquiries. They all want something; time, attention, an interview. Many want to tell us about their fear, illness, nightmares, or (what often seems like) outright paranoid conspiracies. And then, over time, these fears and “conspiracies” keep getting confirmed. As Jan Jekielek (a senior editor with The Epoch Times) recently said to me, it is getting harder and harder to tell which ones are mere conspiracy theories and which are true reality.
One farm visitor told me of his foreshadowing massive numbers of deaths within three years consequent to the genetic vaccines, and that this was all about the “Great Reset” and the depopulation agenda of the World Economic Forum (WEF). I tried to reassure him that, in my opinion, this was highly unlikely- while privately thinking about how easily people fall into this type of conspiracy ideation, and how I need to be careful to avoid going there when confronting so many public health decisions that appear either incompetent or nefarious. At the time, I only knew of the WEF as the host of a big annual party in Davos Switzerland where the uber rich and the hoi oligoi of the Western nations went to watch Ted talks, drink the best wine, see and be seen. Silly me. What a long, strange trip this has been. I doubt that even Hunter S. Thompson could have imagined it in his most drug and booze addled state. Suffice to say, I nominate Ralph Steadman as official illustrator of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Or a resurrected Hieronymus Bosch.
But I am wandering from a point that I am afraid to clearly state.
It is starting to look to me like the largest experiment on human beings in recorded history has failed. And, if this rather dry report from a senior Indiana life insurance executive holds true, then Reiner Fuellmich’s “Crimes against Humanity” push for convening new Nuremberg trials starts to look a lot less quixotic and a lot more prophetic.
Here is what lit me up in this report from The Center Square contributor Margaret Menge.
“The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica said the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people.
“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” the company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference this week. “The data is consistent across every player in that business.”
OneAmerica is a $100 billion insurance company that has had its headquarters in Indianapolis since 1877. The company has approximately 2,400 employees and sells life insurance, including group life insurance to employers in the state.
Davison said the increase in deaths represents “huge, huge numbers,” and that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica.
“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said.
“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.””
So, what is driving this unprecedented surge in all-cause mortality?
“Most of the claims for deaths being filed are not classified as COVID-19 deaths,
Davison said.“What the data is showing to us is that the deaths that are being reported as COVID deaths greatly understate the actual death losses among working-age people from the pandemic. It may not all be COVID on their death certificate, but deaths are up just huge, huge numbers.””
Take a moment to read the entire article. Now. Then let’s continue on, assuming that you have.
AT A MINIMUM, based on my reading, one has to conclude that if this report holds and is confirmed by others in the dry world of life insurance actuaries, we have both a huge human tragedy and a profound public policy failure of the US Government and US HHS system to serve and protect the citizens that pay for this “service”.
IF this holds true, then the genetic vaccines so aggressively promoted have failed, and the clear federal campaign to prevent early treatment with lifesaving drugs has contributed to a massive, avoidable loss of life.
AT WORST, this report implies that the federal workplace vaccine mandates have driven what appear to be a true crime against humanity. Massive loss of life in (presumably) workers that have been forced to accept a toxic vaccine at higher frequency relative to the general population of Indiana.
FURTHERMORE, we have also been living through the most massive, globally coordinated propaganda and censorship campaign in the history of the human race. All major mass media and the social media technology companies have coordinated to stifle and suppress any discussion of the risks of the genetic vaccines AND/OR alternative early treatments.
IF this report holds true, there must be accountability. We are not just talking about running over the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States and grinding it into the mud with an army of artificial intelligence-powered heavy infantry. This article reads like a dry description of an avoidable mass casualty event caused by a mandated experimental medical procedure. One for which all opportunities for the victims to have become self-informed about the potential risks have been methodically erased from both the internet and public awareness by an international corrupt cabal operating under the flag of the “Trusted News Initiative”. George Orwell must be spinning in his grave.
I hope I am wrong. I fear I am right.
@adamdalgliesh
Note, that the FDA gave them a way out:
So, let them prescribe it as a deworming treatment, or whatever and not as a COVID treatment – problem solved!
By the way off label drug use done intelligently and wisely makes great sense to me. I am also for specific illness related therapeutics. All seem like no brainers to me. As does the use of vaccination (which I understand you have serious concerns about).
I was addressing Adam. I was talking about his conclusion about so many deaths unrelated to Covid taking place.
Your post was not very specific, and more than a bit difficult to understand, not to be unpleasant, so if you wouldn’t mind explaining, what are you talking about?
I am talking about one thing and you are on completely different subject. Feel free to ramble on.
Off label drug use is not wild speculation. What was done to prevent treatment was not a conspiracy theory. Rick Bright is quite proud of his actions, even as Andrew Hill appears quite ashamed of his own. Each have confessed to their role in coordinating the blockage of HCQ and IVM, respectively. Its not a theory when you have the testimony of the culprits involved boasting and excusing their misdeeds. Though not medical evidence, their testimonies of their conspiratorial roles are quite evidentiary to their crimes they commited.
Where do you believe the proof originates from? Why do you believe that about 6% of drugs for cardiac patients are not off-label? Off label use of drugs is the standard of care for most treatments, period. This might be difficult for some to accept, but it is quite literally not a contestable fact.
And while you waiting for your proof, people die. This should be hard for anyone to accept. The 450K Americans and world wide nearly 2 million people who died waiting for a vaccine while treatments were always available paid the price for such patience as you call for. How remarkable is it that the only person in the US govt who was pursuing the available use of HCQ, one of the most benign treatments available, was not a physician, not a scientists and not about to let PHARMA dictate what could and could not be prescribed between a doctor and his patient. Yet it was PHARMA who had the last say in matters as they tied it into a late use EUA to prevent any timely use of it. Then came the toxic study. Then came the fraudulent studies. Then HCQ quietly was never mentioned again. No investigation. No prosecution, not even for the deaths in the toxic drug trial.
Conspiracy theories and wild speculation do not allow for:
Evidence that documents a relationship between an activity, treatment, or intervention (including technology) and its intended outcomes, including measuring the direction and size of a change, and the extent to which a change may be attributed to the activity or intervention.
Change your settings not to allow word substitutions, problem solved.
Proven conclusion requires proof by definition. That I understand maybe hard for some to accept.
Correction to my last post: I wrote “censors,” not “consort.” Those bastards at Microsoft often substitute words I didn’t write for those that I did write. Sabotage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AusyLoXbncM
Flash!!! The FDA has just sent threatening letters to all medical boards in all 50 states, warning that the FDA will take punitive measures against all doctors and pharmacies that prescribe ivermectin, if they claim it is a safe and effective treatment for COVID19. Among the organizations that have been put on notice to take disciplinary action against noncompliant doctors and pharmacies are state licencing boards.
TrialSiteNews, the YouTube site that just reported this, says it is being heavily censored by YouTube, and is therefore starting a site on Rumble to avoid censorship, and also “farming out” some of its news to other stations that have fared better with the YouTube consort.
Infamous!!!
@Bear
@Felix
Very important question. The answer is no you don’t need to prove cause and effect. In a crisis you don’t have the luxury of time, and you need to treat the patient in front of you as if his life depends on your clinical judgement and immediate response to a medical threat because it actually does.
In the middle of a pandemic, when >7-15K people are dying per day, you can’t wait for proof, you have to find it. You need to develop the proof in the care you provide the patient in front of you, or they will possibly be added to the list of casualties. An understanding of your patient’s health, the principles of medical actions of the drugs and as much info as you have on the disease is all that is needed to anticipate what will work. So you try that, and monitor the patient’s outcome. If they do not respond to the therapy, you change the therapy to find some combination of drugs that do, always monitoring responses to treatment. This is how you actually prove a treatment works using off label drugs to improve a patient’s care. You can’t wait for proof nor for new drugs to be designed and manufactured. But the treatments you are using aren’t chemotherapy drugs or drugs of uncertain safety. They are well established medicines whose safety profile is well known and known to be safe. You’re familiar with them and how they should act against similar diseases. If the patient fails to be responsive to treatment, choose another treatment combo. Clinical judgement, medical training and the Precautionary Principle will lead you to a treatment that works. And if you don’t find a treatment cocktail that does work, well, the drugs are known to be safe, so you did all that can be expected, and you did no harm.
Such investigative drug trials are quite missing over the past 2yrs beyond the work by a few brave physicians, which is by itself a great crime. This is how they developed HCQ cocktail, IVM cocktail, the 8 day treatment plan, Dr. DeMello’s plan, Tyson/Fareed’s plan. This is how medicine works, when it works.
@Bear
@Felix
Very important question. The answer is no you don’t need to prove cause and effect. In a crisis you don’t have the luxury of time, and you need to treat the patient in front of you as if his life depends on your clinical judgement and immediate response to a medical threat because it actually does.
In the middle of a pandemic, when >7-15K people are dying per day, you can’t wait for proof, you have to find it. You need to develop the proof in the care you provide the patient in front of you, or they will possibly be added to the list of casualties. An understanding of your patient’s health, the principles of medical actions of the drugs and as much info as you have on the disease is all that is needed to anticipate what will work. So you try that, and monitor the patient’s outcome. If they do not respond to the therapy, you change the therapy to find some combination of drugs that do, always monitoring responses to treatment. This is how you actually prove a treatment works using off label drugs to improve a patient’s care. You can’t wait for proof nor for new drugs to be designed and manufactured. But the treatments you are using aren’t chemotherapy drugs or drugs of uncertain safety. They are well established medicines whose safety profile is well known and known to be safe. You’re familiar with them and how they should act against similar diseases. If the patient fails to be responsive to treatment, choose another treatment combo. Clinical judgement, medical training and the Precautionary Principle will lead you to a treatment that works. And if you don’t find a treatment cocktail that does work, well, the drugs are known to be safe, so you did all that can be expected, and you did no harm.
Such investigative drug trials are quite missing over the past 2yrs beyond the work by a few brave physicians, which is by itself a great crime. This is how they developed HCQ cocktail, IVM cocktail, the 8 day treatment plan, Dr. DeMello’s plan, Tyson/Fareed’s plan. This is how medicine works, when it works.
@Bear
Very important question. The answer is no you don’t need to prove cause and effect. In a crisis you don’t have the luxury of time, and you need to treat your patients as if his life depends on your clinical judgement because it does.
In the middle of a pandemic, when >7K people are dying per day, you can’t wait for proof, you have to find it. You need to develop the proof in the care you provide the patient in front of you, or they will possibly be added to the 7000 casualties. An understanding of your patient’s health, the principles of medical actions of the drugs and as much info as you have on the disease is all that is needed to anticipate what will work. So you try that, and monitor the patient’s outcome. If they do not respond to the therapy, you change the therapy to find some combination of drugs that do, always monitoring responses to treatment. This is how you actually prove a treatment works using off label drugs to improve a patient’s care. You can’t wait for proof nor for new drugs to be designed and manufactured. But the treatments you are using aren’t chemotherapy drugs or drugs of uncertain safety. They are well established medicines whose safety profile is well known and known to be safe. You’re familiar with them and how they should act against similar diseases. If the patient fails to be responsive to treatment, choose another treatment combo. Clinical judgement, medical training and the Precautionary Principle will lead you to a treatment that works. And if you don’t find a treatment cocktail that does work, well, the drugs are known to be safe, so you did all that can be expected, and you did no harm.
Such investigative drug trials are quite missing over the past 2yrs beyond the work by a few brave physicians, which is by itself a great crime. This is how they developed HCQ cocktail, IVM cocktail, the 8 day treatment plan, Dr. DeMello’s plan, Tyson/Fareed’s plan. This is how medicine works, when it works.
I’m not a liar and not a troll and my record will remain here and everywhere.
Yes one needs to ALWAYS SHOW cause and effect in science and it is rejection of science that has caused such huge problems in our world.
There’s a reduction in death and that is due to the vaccine.
The covid death rate continues due to the crimes of anti vaccine ideology and allowing the virus to be free to mutate.
Does not one need to prove cause and effect to get a proven conclusion. Otherwise at best what one has is random speculation based on ones own conjecture.
My over-all takeaway from these reports from Indiana is that the government’s measures to end the COVID19 pandemic has not resulted in a decrease in the total number of deaths and serious illnesses from all causes, including but not limited to Covid. While the total number of serious illnesses and deaths from Covid has decreased somewhat since the vaccines were instituted, the over-all number of serious illnesses and deaths from all causes does not appear to have been reduced . Instead, it seems to have increased substantially. That means that the anti-Covid measures adopted by the USG and other have caused, noy less people to get seriously ill and die during the past two years. Why or how this is so has yet to be found out. But it is increasingly difficult to deny that the combination of vaccines, lockdowns, and Covid passports has had a negative impact on public health.
On the face of it, the increased death rates in the 18-64 age group is disturbing, but the interpretation of the data is far from definitive. As I have long contended, all the data is so tainted, that we can tell little more than people are dying from something. Are they dying from Covid, or from the vax, or from other causes? And how many of those who die are killed by the medieval ICU procedures or from being denied “off-label” medication?
All the data we have to work with ultimately comes from death certificates generated by hospitals and coroners, whose integrity and reliability have been compromised from the start. Next, the death statistics are filtered through the CDC, and other governmental agencies, who make the numbers say what they want them to say, either by distortion or by outright falsification. [Similarly, infection rates and hospitalization rates are highly unreliable.]
What’s the point? None of the data or statistics can be trusted, and are almost certainly inaccurate, if not totally distorted and manipulated for political purposes. So, what do we do? We carry on the best we can, deciding for ourselves what is best for us and our families. Mass mandates and coercive restrictions are wrong and should be resisted. Ride out the storm. We will reach herd immunity, eventually. Some may die, most will live. If we are lucky, we will come out of this free people.
I respect Malone and the people who trust him. I would never say he is a crook.
Felix why are you addressing me. I thought you were gone, you promised. It appeared you lied. You realize I think you are just a loser who likes to stir up the pot for his lack of anything else to do.
Some call that a Troll.
While I am waiting for clarity in the somewhat unclear question you were asking of me, unless it was rhetorical, do enlighten us with the basis of calling Dr. Malone and his ‘types’ a crook.
Ted can there be any doubt and you seem to be saying that this insurance company knows that the unvaccinated are a risk. Do you not agree that these Malone types are crooked as.hell? If so say it.
@Felix
I’d be happy to respond but I am not sure of your request. Can you state it more clearly so I know what you are asking?
Where’s Edgar and Sebastien and Bear and is there anybody who can oppose this tripe from Malone.
Peloni the way you put the pandemic as I quoted I put you the question how you actually see the pandemic?
@Adam
Among the issues that were raised in this zoom call was the topic of employment deficiencies.
This relates to a topic of which most people do not have any knowledge. In a hospital setting, doctors, nurses and technicians are all based on ratios. 1 doctor per so many beds and the same for nurses and technicians. When staffing is low, the ratios get stretched, “breaking the ratios”. When the stretch goes too far, they simply reduce the available beds, but their patient load remains unchanged. So, this reduced employment actually will cause the available ICU beds to drop and the ICU occupancy to sharply rise, all without admitting a single patient more. So, I suspect that the recent no-jab terminations probably have helped fuel this pseudo ICU occupancy.
One more thing about hospitals is that in Germany, for example, they have an enormous number of hospital beds, and this has helped them during the pandemic. In the US, the models are based on need. They staff the ICU beds, actually all the beds, based on a business model of efficient need. So, slight reductions would make significant changes, as the ICUs are regularly intended to be, well, not overfull, but not 30% full. 70-80% would not be concerning, even pre-pandemic. Just FYI.
Although Mr. Davison of OneAmerica life insurancassumes that COVID19 and the ‘pandemic” must be responsible for the 40 per cent increase in deaths among those insured by his company, the remarks of Dr. Lindsay Weaver, the chief medical officer, in a follow-up call with The Center Square reporter, indicates that this asumption is incorrect. The majority of those hospitalized in Indiana ICUs are for non-Covid conditions. And the number of deaths from Covid in Indiana has actually declined. A logical deduction from this is that the massive increase in deaths in Indiana is from non-covid diseases, or possibly, adverse reactions to the vaccine.
Sorry Felix, I am not sure of what you are questioning the meaning.
Ted questioned whether this death rate is relatable to the virus or the vaccine. Malone referenced the pandemic which would include all the above which is because we have questions that have no answers because the NIH and PHARMA, who each are responsible for funding research, and each are fat with Fedreral dollarsm and each have an interest in supporting their vaccines agenda, have not funded any research to pursue these answers.
I kinda just said the same thing I said before. Not really sure how to restate it without just restating it.
Peloni
It wasn’t specifically the vaccines, it was the pandemic, the restriction of treatment, the lock-downs, the social chaos, the nursing home care, and, yes, the experimental vaccines
Meaning?
@Ted
I hope they have something more than a hunch to explain that because it seems very unlikely to be true based on the data collected on the virus.
This sharp uptick in deaths are non-Covid deaths, only 50.6K of 250K died of Covid in 3rdQuarter 2021. So, to believe these deaths are Covid related, there has to be an association with the virus. The cases were worse in 2020, the hospitalizations were worse and the deaths were worse and testing was similar (I have all of this detailed, so let me know if anyone cares to see them). 2020 was much worse than 2021, in Indiana at least.
Here is the graph showing the relative all cause deaths from 2019, 2020 and 2021:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fda2169b7-439d-4f48-9111-07b682fde306_572x288.png
Also the 2020 variant had a much higher rate of death (CFR), about 2% compared to 0.25-0.75%
Yet, only after 18months of Covid, suddenly the virus is killing people under the radar?
As I look at this data, I find the idea that the sharp uptick in death in the 2021 3rdQuarter is virus related to be be very unconvincing, but we can each use our own perspectives to guess what might be seen, because we purposely do not know the answer to this question.
To know if this was truly the vaccine or the virus or something else such as suicide, drug addiction or some altogether unrelated health consequence of the pandemic, a great deal more info would be required, such as autopsies. The autopsies are critically vital to settle this debate and nothing else will really answer the question as to the use of the vaccines and their harms and their benefits. I really do not believe that in all the world, these govts are not conducting any autopsies as they are using these shots, but they are not doing so in public, and this fact should concern us all.
The final point that should be noted is that of all the people who died from the virus, died from a lack of treatment, even if they received a vaccine that did not prevent the disease. Just as if they had an untreated bullet wound or were left unattended after a car accident. The lack of treatment and the forced use of vaccines are each are a failure of public policy. Whatever caused these massive increases in deaths, if it was related to the pandemic at all, Malone’s statement would hold true:
It has been a pandemic of a lack of treatment that caused all of this.
He said it in this short video.
https://thecovidworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/YTEmamwDUzIfSTms.mp4
He said that “premiums would go up for companies with low vaccination rates”
He said it in this short video.
https://thecovidworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/YTEmamwDUzIfSTms.mp4
He said that “premiums would go up for companies with low vaccination rates”
@Ted
It’s a fair question. I’ll do a deep dive into the data in a later post, but the answer to the question virus or vaccine is that we don’t know, and Malone, as always, strikes the correct balance in not injecting a preferred clarity where there is none to be had. His reference to the Nuremberg Code, however, is not related to the vaccines, not alone, as you will note in his paragraphs beginning with “At minimum” and “At worst”. These people died, and their deaths, once confirmed, will be seen to be highly irregular and associated with the pandemic.
The treatments were always available and have only improved in number and effectiveness over time. Yet, their use is blocked under licensing threats, prescription interference and public derision describing such treatments as horse medicine, while discussion, by physicians or citizens, is terms for social erasure, and this is public health at the wheel of all of this, and it is not a point of confusion or a lack of knowledge. It was known since 2006 that HCQ was a treatment for SARS and Fauci, himself wrote a paper on it.
Hence, the experiment Malone references began in 2020, not in December, but in March. It wasn’t specifically the vaccines, it was the pandemic, the restriction of treatment, the lock-downs, the social chaos, the nursing home care, and, yes, the experimental vaccines. All of it has been perpetrated and made possible because healthcare was withheld and manipulated to not treat the sick. There can be no real debate on this, and absolutely no excuse for it. Which is why, Malone, the quintessential citizen scientist grounded on facts and reason, has come to add his voice toward acknowledging his support for Fuellmich’s call for justice in these matters.
But in one of the things I read the exec said that premiums would be increased for companies who failed to push vaccines. This was left out of this article.
He said it in this short video.
https://thecovidworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/YTEmamwDUzIfSTms.mp4
He said that “premiums would go up for companies with low vaccination rates”
This is the essential-reading article that Dr. Malone referenced. I think it answers Ted’s question. It is from the Jan.1 issue of a publication called The Center Sqare Indiana, which reports on all sorts of health conditions and problems in Indiana, not just Covid.
It seems clear from the reports of this Indiana life insurance executive, when combined with the reports of other Indian state health officials and hospital executives who also participated in this virtual press conference, that the increase in deaths in not from Covid19 but from other illnesses. But whatever is causing the increases in deaths, it is clear that the vaccination campaign has failed.
Is the increase in deaths due to Covid or the vaccine? The article is unclear. His reference to the Nuremberg Code suggests the vaccine but throughout the article he is talking about Covid deaths.