T. Belman. In the fifties and sixties, antisemitism was the word and spelling. Then over the years it was replaced by “anti-Semitism” This really rankled me for the reasons herein set out. In most cases I would take the trouble to correct the mispelling and inserting in its place “antisemitism”.
Regularly spelled with a hyphen in American English but without in academia, some experts claim the punctuation mark slashes the word’s potency
In April of 2015, Microsoft received an unusual memo. Crafted on behalf of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, a group of scholars issued a “Memo on Spelling of Antisemitism,” urging a change to the mammoth hi-tech company’s auto-correct spelling policy. Until then, a hyphen had been perfunctorily added between “anti” and “Semitism” in the word commonly used for hatred and prejudice against Jews.
Far from being an innocuous debate over semantics, the IHRA claimed that a hyphened “anti-Semitism” gave credence to discredited Nazi racial theories, wherein humanity was divided into superior and inferior subcategories. Additionally, claimed the scholars, a hyphen dilutes and distorts the term’s meaning by implying that groups other than Jews are included within the supposed “Semites” being opposed.
Case in point is a 2015 speech given by consumer rights advocate Ralph Nader: “[Supporters of Israel] know how to accuse people of anti-Semitism if any issue on Israel is criticized, even though the worst anti-Semitism in the world today is against Arabs and Arab-Americans,” he said.
Addressing a gathering of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, the five-time presidential nominee’s remarks focused heavily on Jews and Israel.
According to Nader, a longtime critic of the Jewish state, “The Semitic race is Arabs and Jews and Jews do not own the phrase anti-Semitism.” For this and other remarks, Nader was accused of “linguistically hijacking” the term anti-Semitism by some critics.
Like the word “Aryan,” the term “Semitism” is based on a mythical conglomeration of languages and race, as opposed to science. “Semites” were people who spoke one of several related languages, all of whom traced their roots to the Bible’s Shem, Noah’s son.
The term “antisemitism,” coined in 1879, was not a reference to groups of people who spoke similar Levant-based languages. Rather, as “invented” by German journalist Wilhelm Marr, “antisemitism” was intended to give an air of modernity and science to old-fashioned Jew-hatred.
After its inception in Germany, antisemitism — without a hyphen — spread across the continent. The term was never hyphenated in German, Spanish, or French. In English, however, the term has come to appear with a hyphen in most popular usages, outside of Europe.
For the IHRA, the addition of a hyphen to antisemitism is problematic in part because the group sees the hyphen as a “[legitimization] of a form of pseudo-scientific racial classification that was thoroughly discredited by association with Nazi ideology.”
According to the alliance, adding a hyphen also “divides the term, stripping it from its meaning of opposition and hatred toward Jews. Antisemitism should be read as a unified term so that the meaning of the generic term for modern Jew-hatred is clear.
“At a time of increased violence and rhetoric aimed towards Jews, it is urgent that there is clarity and no room for confusion or obfuscation when dealing with antisemitism,” stated the alliance.
‘Overreaction to Arab claims’
Since 2015, governments around the world have adopted the IHRA’s definition of antisemitism, and Microsoft no longer “forces” a hyphen into the term. However, most English-language media outlets and writers outside of academia — including this one — continue to employ a hyphenated anti-Semitism.
Unlike those in the ivory tower, in the assessment of some Jewish communal practitioners, now is not the time for a semantic debate. When questioned by The Times of Israel, very few experts expressed concern about anti-Semitism continuing to be spelled with a hyphen among the general public.
Ken Jacobson, the Anti-Defamation League’s deputy national director, believes the conversation is “intellectually dueling and largely divorced from reality.”
In Jacobson’s assessment, the debate is “is an overreaction to Arab claims that they can’t be anti-Semites because they are a Semitic people,” he said.
Calling the term anti-Semitism “archaic and strange,” Jacobson noted that “it took the shock of Russian pogroms and the Holocaust to bring the term into everyday usage,” as he told The Times of Israel.
Because the term anti-Semitism has been spelled with a hyphen “millions of times in every vehicle possible,” said Jacobson, “changing it will not enhance anyone’s understanding and could even undermine a word that aptly conveys the power of this evil.” said Jacobson.
For Rob Leikind, head of Boston’s American Jewish Committee chapter, “There are good arguments with which to contend that the spelling ‘antisemitism’ more accurately depicts anti-Jewish hostility or prejudice than the spelling ‘anti-Semitism.’”
However, said Leikind, “‘anti-Semitism’ is the common way to spell the word, some extremists excepted. Nearly everyone understands that this word references Jews alone, and changing to ‘antisemitism’ would accomplish little beyond causing additional confusion.”
Clarity is also on the mind of journalist Cnaan Liphshiz, a Netherlands-based reporter for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
“In my professional capacity I use whatever the style guide requires. Personally, I find the debate too persnickety to feel strongly about one way or another,” said Liphshiz, who regularly writes about anti-Semitism in Europe.
“However, I’m inclined to use the non-hyphenated variant because that’s how it’s spelled in virtually all the European languages that I monitor for my reporting,” said Liphshiz.
‘Embedded in our collective consciousness’
Among experts questioned by The Times of Israel, several made cases for the importance of “antisemitism,” as opposed to “anti-Semitism.”
“The term anti-Semitism (as you apparently spell it) is meaningless, because there is no Semitism one can be ‘anti’ to,” wrote Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer in an email to The Times of Israel.
According to Bauer, “There are Semitic languages, including for instance Tigrean in Ethiopia, and the term hardly refers to antipathy towards the Tigre. You cannot be anti-Semitic just as you cannot be anti-Indo-European,” said Bauer.
Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, head of the AMCHA Initiative focused on campus anti-Semitism, wrote that “Anti-anything — with a hyphen — describes a state of being opposed to a particular policy, idea or thing at a particular time.”
However, added Rossman-Benjamin, anti-Semitism goes beyond “opposition” to Jews, and involves “a profound and irrational hatred of them, a phenomenon embedded in our collective consciousness that has existed longer than any other form of hatred. Anti-Semitism — with the hyphen — does not seem to me to capture this understanding of the word,” she said.
According to Rossman-Benjamin, a hyphen-less antisemitism “is also the recognized spelling among scholars of antisemitism and the one we use in all of our scholarly work. The confusion arises because anti-Semitism — with the hyphen — has become the accepted spelling in most dictionaries and spell-checkers.”
Despite her case for ditching the hyphen, Rossman-Benjamin was pragmatic about the likelihood of “anti-Semitism” disappearing from popular use.
“The approach we take is to use antisemitism in the vast majority of our work, including scholarly articles, research, reports and presentations,” said Rossman-Benjamin. “However, when writing for news outlets we have no problem including the hyphen to be consistent with the preferred spelling of reporters, editors and fact-checkers, and it saves us much back-and-forth on corrections.”
Another organization with a focus on combating Judeophobia on campus is StandWithUs, which provides activists with strategies and materials about — for example — how to defend Israel against the BDS movement.
According to StandWithUs co-founder and CEO Roz Rothstein, her organization has always used a hyphenated anti-Semitism.
“As incidents of anti-Semitism across the US and other countries have escalated, and the conversation should address both the incidents and the immediate need for solutions, we don’t want to distract people from the importance of the conversation by throwing a new spelling at them,” said Rothstein.
Echoing that sentiment was Alvin H. Rosenfeld, director of Indiana University’s Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism.
“Will spelling the word in an unhyphenated way as “antisemite” and not “anti-Semite” correct its misuse? Probably not for those who willfully misuse it, but for others, it may clarify that no one ever beat or cursed a Jew because he hated ‘Semitism,’ but only because he hated Jews,” wrote Rosenfeld.
@ Edgar G.:
Depends on whether you live in a blue state or a red state. Also, I don’t think living in the U.S. gives me any special knowledge. Even if people live in a country, they probably only frequent certain areas and talk to certain people, and they only exchange pleasantries with most people, and they get their info from media but only some media. I made a joke about that, making fun of people who say they know about other countries because they visited there or communicate with a friend there. When the NY Coliseum was replaced by the current Time Warner shopping complex at Columbus Circle, 59th Street and Broadway — you can google it for a picture, it’s big — when the scaffolding was finally removed, the building was still empty and had just one huge sign that could be seen from Central Park across the street: “SWATCH, world’s largest watch store.” I could have taken a picture of that, and insisted to people that this building was the world’s largest watch store and that I knew best because I was actually there, see? here’s the picture.
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Yes I knew all about Marr many years ago. He was a sort of mashuggena eugenist or something like that extolling the superiority of the “Aryan” Race. ,The odd thing is that he kept marrying Jewish women…. Presumably at those times he was pro Jewish, ……? but changed. The story is that before he died he recanted and said he’d been wrong.
You live in the US. What is the general feeling amongst the population about Trump. Do they think that the Dems will succeed in having him impeached, as they are trying so hard to do, although I can’t quite make out for what.
@ Edgar G.:
The point is that words do not derive their meaning from their roots but from accepted common usage. The word was coined in 1879 by Wilhelm Marr, in his pamphlet by that name, to mean hatred of Jews, which he was advocating, and has been used that way ever since. The Antisemitic Movement was the parent movement of the Nazis. There is no such thing as hatred of Semites. It’s just an attempt to remove the word, with all of its emotional resonance, from the language. The Left tries to control the conversation by redefining language. No accident, I’m sure, that Noam Chomsky is a linguist.
@ Sebastien Zorn:
You are likelycorrect…as far as you go… But I actually looked up the separate word “Semitism” and after poring past a few “Anti-Semitisms”, came to it, and it’s defined in the dictionaries therein as referring to the Jews, amongst a couple of other associated meanings. So we both can be correct.
This was because I had in my past readings come across references to “Philo-Semitism”, and after, another way of saying the same thing, “Judeophile”..
Exactly as I have posted above.
Every print dictionary I’ve ever seen puts it under “A” as a word in it’s own right rather than under “S” as an antonym. An old joke of mine I’ve used to illustrate this many times. An antisemite is no more someone who hates semites than a Civilization is a the culture of a city-state or an antipasto is someone who hates pasta of the male persuasion (that used to be funny until this unbelievable fluid gender nonsense that the left is pushing with straight faces.)
@ Abdul Ameer:
From Ivan…….You say there is no such thing as “Semitism”.. Have you ever come across the term “Philo-Semitism”….it’s similar in meaning to “Judeophile”. I have..and it is TOTALLY referring always, to Jews, never any other Semitic people..I’ve seen it even in texts from the 19th cent.. ahem… It’s a word in every dictionary, and of the 2-3 meanings given, one refers specifically to the Jewish People. .
A word can have several applications… We ALL know THAT..!
So all these professional eggheads that nobody ever heard of before, have had their little moment in the sun. We can say (like the close-out of a James A. Fitzpatrick Travelogue) ….”as the sun sinks slowly in the West..we bid farewell to…”…
@ Abdul Ameer:
You say there is no such thing as “Semitism”.. Have you ever come across the term “Philo-Semitism”….it’s similar in meaning to “Judeophile”. I have..and it is TOTALLY referring always, to Jews, never any other Semitic people..I’ve seen it even in texts from the 19th cent.. ahem… It’s a word in every dictionary, and of the 2-3 meanings given, one refers specifically to the Jewish People. .
A word can have several applications… We ALL know THAT..!
So all these professional eggheads that nobody ever heard of before, have had their little moment in the sun. We can say (like the close-out of a James A. Fitzpatrick Travelogue) ….”as the sun sinks slowly in the West..we bid farewell to…”…
@ Abdul Ameer:
. I think the whole mish-mash is a storm in a tiny wineglass. A complete over-reaction to the semi-facetious comment of a few isolated Arabs who want to stir up a little swampy water. everyone knows that the word-actually two words- refers to Jews only, even the aforementioned Arabs. Personally I use both with and without hyphen, but also more recently have preferred “Jew-Hater” or Jew Hater, as the best way to describe the visceral irrational hatred of Jews. Just a couple of simple words easy for everyone to understand to whom it refers.
Just two plain words
The easiest way to conceptualize the issue is to ask whether there is such a thing as “Semitism”. Of course, there is no such thing. If there is no such thing as “Semitism”, then there cannot be any opposition to it. From that logical standpoint, “antisemitism” should be the preferred spelling.
The meaning of the word does not change whether spelled with a hyphen or without. The word was, as the article points out, coined as a euphemistic way of saying “Jew-hatred”.