If it is to punish him because of Lockerbie, they should have done it right away. He gave up his nuclear activity and paid reparations to the victims families. So why now? Furthermore Obama has close ties to Qaddafi through Farrakhan and Wright. I doubt it is an humanitarian intervention though that is how they are spinning it. They are even fear mongering about the possibility of Qadaffi using Mustard Gas. What is this concern based on? Why does the Arab League want him taken down? Why is the west fronting for the Arab League. Why doesn’t the west say its your neighborhood, its your initiative, so you do it? We know nothing of the “rebel forces”. It took Bush a year to get all the consents needed from Congress, the Senate and the UN before attacking Iraq. Here it took less than 30 days and both houses were not consulted. Strange things are happening. What is Obama’s goals in the ME, what is his strategy. Beats me.
Both in Serbia and Libya the sovereign power was trying to suppress revolt. In both cases the revolt became violent with weapons of all types being used. What is the sovereign to do. He must defeat the revolt. This requires use of considerable force. Obviously the world is denying the sovereign power the right of self defense. Apply that to Israel. All the Palestinians have to do is start a war. As soon as Israel moves to suppress with all means at its disposal, the UN will pass a similar resolution authorizing the use of force. This is very ominous for Israel’s right of self defense and for a negotiated solution. First the UN is trying to declare settlements illegal. Next it will support Palesine within ’67 lines. Then the Palis will attack us requiring us to defeat them which defense will justify a Chapter VII resolution. Ted Belman
Western warplanes, missiles batter Libyan targets
By REUTERS AND JPOST.COM STAFF
TRIPOLI – Western forces hit targets along the Libyan coast on Saturday, using strikes from air and sea to force Muammar Gaddafi’s troops to cease fire and end attacks on civilians.
Libyan state television said 48 people had been killed and 150 wounded in the allied air strikes. It also said there had been a fresh wave of strikes on Tripoli early on Sunday.
There was no way to independently verify the claims.
CBS News on its website said on Sunday that three US B-2 stealth bombers had dropped 40 bombs on a “major Libyan airfield” that was not further identified. A Pentagon spokesman said he had no information about such an attack.
French planes fired the first shots in what is the biggest international military intervention in the Arab world since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, destroying tanks and armored vehicles in the region of the rebels’ eastern stronghold, Benghazi.
Hours later, US and British warships and submarines launched 110 Tomahawk missiles against air defenses around the capital Tripoli and the western city of Misrata, which has been besieged by Gaddafi’s forces, US military officials said.
They said US forces and planes were working with Britain, France, Canada and Italy in operation “Odyssey Dawn”.
Gaddafi called it “colonial, crusader” aggression.
“It is now necessary to open the stores and arm all the masses with all types of weapons to defend the independence, unity and honor of Libya,” he said in an audio message broadcast on state television hours after the strikes began.
Meanwhile, officials in Washington and Europe expressed concern that Gaddafi could use stockpiles of Mustard Gas against his own people if he becomes desperate. According to a Washington Post report, Western reconnaissance satellites have been keeping close tabs on Libya’s chemical weapons stores.
Officials said that the possibility of Gaddafi resorting to, or having the capacity to deliver the chemical weapons was unlikely. Last week, however, Libya’s former ambassador to the United Nations Abdurrahman Mohamed Shalgham warned that, “I do expect that he’s going to attack Benghazi with chemical weapons,” if the fighting reaches the rebel stronghold.
China and Russia, which abstained in the UN Security Council vote last week endorsing intervention, expressed regret at the military action. China’s Foreign Ministry said it hoped the conflict would not lead to a greater loss of civilian life.
Explosions and heavy anti-aircraft fire rattled Tripoli in the early hours of Sunday. The shooting was followed by defiant shouts of “Allahu Akbar” that echoed around the city center.
Libyan state television showed footage from an unidentified hospital of what it called victims of the “colonial enemy”. Ten bodies were wrapped up in white and blue bed sheets, and several people were wounded, one of them badly, the television said.
Tripoli residents said they had heard an explosion near the eastern Tajoura district, while in Misrata they said strikes had targeted an airbase used by Gaddafi’s forces.
A Reuters witness in the eastern rebel stronghold of Benghazi reported loud explosions and anti-aircraft fire, but it was unclear which side was shooting.
The intervention, after weeks of diplomatic wrangling, was welcomed in Benghazi with a mix of apprehension and relief.
“We think this will end Gaddafi’s rule. Libyans will never forget France’s stand with them. If it weren’t for them, then Benghazi would have been overrun tonight,” said Iyad Ali, 37.
“We salute France, Britain, the United States and the Arab countries for standing with Libya. But we think Gaddafi will take out his anger on civilians. So the West has to hit him hard,” said civil servant Khalid al-Ghurfaly, 38.
Gaddafi seen losing grip on Libya
The strikes, launched from some 25 ships, including three US submarines, in the Mediterranean, followed a meeting in Paris of Western and Arab leaders backing the intervention.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy said participants had agreed to use “all necessary means, especially military” to enforce the Security Council resolution calling for an end to attacks on civilians.
“Colonel Gaddafi has made this happen,” British Prime Minister David Cameron told reporters after the meeting. “We cannot allow the slaughter of civilians to continue.”
Some analysts have questioned the strategy for the military intervention, fearing Western forces might be sucked into a long civil war despite a US insistence — repeated on Saturday — that it has no plans to send ground troops into Libya.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper suggested that outside powers hoped their intervention would be enough to turn the tide against Gaddafi and allow Libyans to force him out.
“It is our belief that if Mr. Gaddafi loses the capacity to enforce his will through vastly superior armed forces, he simply will not be able to sustain his grip on the country.”
But analysts have questioned what Western powers will do if the Libyan leader digs in, especially since they do not believe they would be satisfied with a de facto partition which left rebels in the east and Gaddafi running a rump state in the west.
One participant at the Paris meeting said Clinton and others had stressed Libya should not be split in two. And on Friday, Obama specifically called on Gaddafi’s forces to pull back from the western cities of Zawiyah and Misrata as well from the east.
“It’s going to be far less straightforward if Gaddafi starts to move troops into the cities which is what he has been trying to do for the past 24 hours,” said Marko Papic at the STRATFOR global intelligence group.
“Once he does that it becomes a little bit more of an urban combat environment and at that point it’s going to be difficult to use air power from 15,000 feet to neutralize that.”
The Libyan government has blamed rebels, who it says belong to al-Qaida, for breaking a ceasefire it announced on Friday.
In Tripoli, several thousand people gathered at the Bab al-Aziziyah palace, Gaddafi’s compound bombed by US warplanes in 1986, to show their support.
“There are 5,000 tribesmen that are preparing to come here to fight with our leader. They better not try to attack our country,” said farmer Mahmoud el-Mansouri.
“We will open up Libya’s deserts and allow Africans to flood to Europe to blow themselves up as suicide bombers.”