WUHAN VIRUS: Where we would be With and Without Protective Measures – CDC

By Andrew G. Benjamin, CFP

With protective measures – social distancing and others – the deaths will have spread out over a longer period of time and will have destroyed our economy, jobs, businesses and wealth. More or less, we end with the same-similar numbers of deaths.

The result are: the dead die poorer and no longer hungry, having left the living much poorer and very hungry.

This too, is based on research conducted at the Wuhan, China, Level IV biolab facility.

  • In spite of persistent reality denials by the Democrat Party in the USA and its media propaganda arm, Wuhan, is in China.
  • The virus, came from China.
  • It is, in other  words, a Chinese virus, or Wuhan virus, if you will, and the president identified its source correctly.

Without protective measures the numbers of infected would have risen sharply and fallen sharply, according to the CDC estimates above, but the numbers of dead may not have risen at all, or only marginally.

The latest, and most reasonable statistical estimates suggest that the dead who died in April, and the dead who died in May, or June, will still have been dead by August and September, unless humanity found a way to reverse reality.

Chinese Study Of The Virus Directly Linking it To Wuhan, China.

Just as Barry and Joe in charge of pandemic materials first decimated, and second, failed to replenish, America’s pandemic supplies painstakingly built up by the previous administration of George W. Bush.

During Donald Trump’s three years in office, the NIH and CDC were granted significant budget increases.

<
>

China’s political class recalculated the benefit-risk ratio for the bioweapon we now know as SARS-Cov-2. They saw massive profits accruing to a future China. The Chinese Communist Party is now wholly allied with America’s Democrat party and its Democrat-media. Both to reverse the results of 2016, by crushing, and reversing the Trump Trade Deal by crushing the US economy and by backing Joe Biden – to insure the return to Business as Usual.

FORBES: Joe Biden Is The Only Man Who Can Save China In 2020

Yes, a bioweapon!

A bioweapon, as the Nobel Prize Laureate who discovered, isolated and sequenced the HIV virus confirmed

With all these you get the FAKE NEWS narratives frontrunning the problem: 

• The virus in not from China.
• The virus is not Chinese.
• Calling it the Wuhan virus is racist.
• The virus is natural.
• Which then pivoted into, the virus is not a bioweapon.
• The narratives ran ahead of the charge by weeks.
• Hydroxycholoroquine does not work.
• It never worked. It’s unproven.
• Rendesimvir does not work.

<
>

Dr. Arnold Weg, the famed internist in the news admitted in critical condition to New York’s Cornell-Weill Medical Center mentioned in this ABC News report, was saved by Israeli GILEAD’s Remsedirvir, recently fast-tracked and approved by the FDA. He was saved, you can see his testimony in the video at the website, because the drug didn’t work? Incidentally, Dr. Anthony Fauci is also mentioned in that report.

Another New York doctor’s 96 year-old heart patient’s dad was saved by Plaquénil, hydroxycholoroquine, and the Z-Pac invented by the Israeli TEVA’s Croat subsidiary PLEVA, because this drug does not work? Or because it’s unsafe for the heart, as the Trump-deranged media would have it?

Z-Pac has saved tens, maybe hundreds of millions since its invention in 1988! Both HQC and Z-Pac are some of the safest drugs known to man. Both have proven themselves.

Or did it become problematic because this doctor has written more books about pandemics and the cures for them than Dr. Anthony Fauci?

Or perhaps because these great doctors lives were saved because Donald Trump overruled Dr Fauci, fast-tracked the drug, and shredded the Obama-Biden era regulations that would have prevented the inclusion to the medical arsenal of these safe, universally-used, anti-viral drugs?

<
>

DISCLOSURE: Andrew Benjamin has known Dr. Weg for over three decades. Benjamin was likely instrumental, possibly with others, over a few hours one evening pleading with GILEAD to relax its policies limiting the drug to 400 trial patients, and under compassionate care to get it to Dr. Weg. 

As of a few hours of writing this report, Dr. Weg has left the hospital and is back in practice, adding to the life saving of the 30,000 patents he has served over decades.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, seeing his colleague’s plight in the news, reversed his objections to Remsedirivir right after the president put the good doctor in a head lock.

That, is the context of the ABC News report above – and this writer’s small in changing US anti-covid policy.

DR, FAUCI’S EARLIER PREDICTIONS WERE ALSO WAY OFF THE MARK!

2005 Precursor to CDC STUDY of Hydroxychloroquine of which Dr Fauci’s group played the central part.

<
>
 

<
>
<
>

RESULTS excerptedChloroquine, a relatively safe, effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases including malaria, amoebiosis and human immunodeficiency virus is effective in inhibiting the infection and spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. The fact that the drug has significant inhibitory antiviral effect when the susceptible cells were treated either prior to or after infection suggests (BOTH) a possible prophylactic and therapeutic use. We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus,suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. “…..A dose-dependant decrease in virus antigen-positive cells was observed starting at 0.1 ?M chloroquine, and concentrations of 10 ?M completely abolished SARS-CoV infection….”  (- Bold face is by this writer)

WE UNDERSTAND DR. FAUCI BETTER NOW:
WHEN A REPUBLICAN IS IN THE WHITE HOUSE, HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE WILL NOT WORK.

WHEN A DEMOCRAT IS IN THE WHITE HOUSE, HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE IS VERY EFFECTIVE – AN ALMOST CERTAIN CURE AGAINST THE CORONAVIRUS FAMILY.

THE CHLOROQUINE AFFAIR – How Media Brainwashes & then Politicizes Their Audiences

<
>


Andrew G. Benjamin — Bio and Archives

Andrew G. Benjamin is a real estate and tax specialist, equities trader, a former economic advisor to New York city mayor Rudy Giuliani; serving on the transition team’s Subcommittee on Taxation, Finance and the Budget. Benjamin also wrote extensively about intelligence, economic issues, the Mideast, terrorism, technology, high end audio and transnational politics.

May 13, 2020 | 9 Comments » | 435 views

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

9 Comments / 9 Comments

  1. “Current evidence suggests that COVID-19 may have a higher fatality rate than the flu, but a definitive conclusion requires more studies.” This article is from healthfeedback.org,a Google-linked pro-WHO, pro-CDC “fact-checking” site that up until now has supported the lockdown. Now, after taking away our human rights and impoverishing us, they suddenly admit that it will “require more studies” to determine if COVID-19 is really more dangerous than the flu.

  2. “Two vaccines within the space of a few months, one of which has added new viral material and/or a variety of new cellular and genetic debris—plus the usual toxic chemicals—and you have a potential recipe for disaster

    Bill Gates, HR 6666, Remdesivir, Deaths in Italy
    Jon Rappoport image
    By Jon Rappoport — NoMoreFakeNews—— Bio and Archives–May 12, 2020”

    This is another article in the current issue of Canada Free Press. Actually, a digest of several different articles on these interconnected subjects. Definitely worth reading.

  3. Nobel prize-winning scientist: the Covid-19 epidemic was never exponential

    “As he is careful to point out, Professor Michael Levitt is not an epidemiologist. He’s Professor of Structural Biology at the Stanford School of Medicine, and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for “the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems.” He’s a numbers guy — as he told us in our interview, his wife says he loves numbers more than her — but then, much of modern science is really about statistics . . . “. This is a fascinating 40-minute interview on the British news site Unheard.com. Dr. Levitt was in Israel when he was being interviewed over a videoconferencing app. from Britain.

    Levitt believes in the “herd immunity” theory–that the best way to get rid of CV-2 is to “let it rip” for a few months until it spreads to enough people for the whole community to acquire herd immunity. Lockdowns, he argue\\es, actually prolong the epidemic, because once people without immunity are released from “captivity,” they will spread the virus. And the lockdowns will collapse the economy, causing massive deaths in the process.

    Amazingly, he praises the Swedish approach, and claims that in the long run it will be more effective than the Israeli approach. A bit weird, but worth listening to.

  4. Correction: The site is unhurd.com, not ‘unheard” .com. Another case of my computer program “correcting” me without my noticing.

  5. Levin goes so far as to endorse the Swedish practice of leaving the sick elderly to die in nursing homes rather than admitting them to hospitals. He argues that it is not in societiy’s best interest to save the lives of people who are both over 70 and have “underlying conditions” that make it unlikely that they will live out the year even without coronavirus. The lives of younger people are more valuable to society, and with their whole lives ahead of them, it is fairer to save their lives than that of sick elderly people who are almost certain to die soon anyway. I don’t agree with this view, but I suppose it deserves a hearing.

  6. @ Adam Dalgliesh:
    Alex said,

    “The lives of younger people are more valuable to society,”

    The eugenicist comes out. After killing off the elderly, who’s next? The unemployed? The Jews? Who makes the call?

  7. “The First Case of COVID-19 in the US Treated with Remdesivir Was in late January – Two Weeks Later China Was Mass Producing the Drug – The Firm Gilead Sciences and Dr. Fauci Are In the Middle
    By Joe Hoft
    Published May 13, 2020 at 9:10am
    279 Comments”

    Hoft accepts that emdesivir may be effective in treating coronavirus. But he is opposed to Fauci’s and as well as George Soros and several Chinese corporations wiht the Giliad corporations. Also critical of Fauci’s opposition to hydroxichlorichine, which is not patent and much cheaper to manufacture than remdesivir.

  8. Ted, why are you censoring this?The First Case of COVID-19 in the US Treated with Remdesivir Was in late January – Two Weeks Later China Was Mass Producing the Drug – The Firm Gilead Sciences and Dr. Fauci Are In the Middle
    By Joe Hoft
    Published May 13, 2020 at 9:10am
    279 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*