Yisrael Beytenu Quits Plesner C’tee over Pro-Arab Bias

Whatever happened to the “equality” part? Just imagine how big the problem will be when we annex Judea and Samaria. Ted Belman

Jewish Home, too, says it will leave “Equality in Service” committee after committee says it won’t punish Arab service evaders.

By Gil Ronen, INN

Yisrael Beytenu, a major partner in the governing coalition, has announced it is quitting its membership in the Plesner Committee that is hashing out a new formula for enlistment of hareidim to the military and national service.

The reason is that the committee has said it will not demand punishment of Arab citizens who shirk from service, recommending sanctions only on hareidi service evaders.

Yisrael Beytenu said in a statement that it believes all citizens must serve equally at age 18, including Arabs. “Yisrael Beitenu believes in the principle established in the Scroll of Independence, according to which all Israelis are equal in rights and duties, regardless of religion, race or sex, and this must be honored,” the party insisted.

The Plesner Committee – also known as the Committee for Advancement of Equality in Service – clarified Thursday that while it favors the principle of “service for all,” it will not recommend slapping any sanctions on Arabs who refuse to enlist, but will recommend punishing hareidim who evade service.

Yisrael Beytenu, which is headed by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, said it would advance its own bill, stipulating equal service for all citizens, independently of the Plesner Committee.

The Jewish Home party also announced Thursday it would leave the committee.

Minister Daniel Hershkowitz, chairman of the party, spoke with the Prime Minister Thursday and told him that he sees no justification for the Jewish Home’s participation in the Plesner Committee, in view of its attitude toward Arab enlistment.

“Whoever receives from the state must also contribute to it – and without Arab contribution there is no equality in sharing the burden,” said Hershkowitz.

June 28, 2012 | 2 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

2 Comments / 2 Comments

  1. Bert,

    I don’t see any evidence that G-d or anybody else gave the Hebrew Language exclusively to the followers of Dat-Moshe. Can you show me any such evidence?

    Looking at the same question from a different angle: it is beyond question that the Phoenicians were Hebrews who didn’t go down into Egypt, and therefore didn’t join the dat-Moshe club. As late as Shlomo ha-Melech, they still spoke Hebrew. Which is why Shlomo rented their labor and purchased their goods to build his Temple (in addition to putting harsh forced labor-conscriptions on Israelites!).

    There are more sabra, native-Hebrew-speaking filipino Catholics serving loyally in the IDF, than there are Satmars or Lubavitchers. So who’s really the problem?

    By the way, could you post a copy of YOUR teudat-lokhem, Bert?

  2. Theodore Herzl had his own experience with so-called ‘Jewish’ leaders. He wrote in his diary that they should write on his tombstone “Here lies a man who had too high an opinion of the Jewish People.”
    Rabbi Kahane also called them “Hebrew speaking gentiles”.
    Our enemy within can be even more destructive than the enemy without.
    Sometimes I almost pity HaShem. In a moment of generosity He made a permanent promise to Abraham and to all his descendants. And now just look at some of those He is stuck with.