Zionism’s Original Sin

Peloni:  It is impossible to reconcile the distinctions drawn between Smotrich’s advocacy to recognize Gaza as Jewish land and those who would see it ceded to the Gazan psychopaths who supported, elected and by the thousands joined Hamas in fulfilling its blood lust and debauchery on October 7 in the Kibutzim of the Gaza envelop.  Abandoning this land to our enemies under any condition or negotiation designates a permanent penalty upon the Jewish people and simultaneously provides a trophy for those who would see the land of Israel soaked in Jewish blood, fulfilling the endless fantasies of those pernicious reprobates singing ‘from the river to the sea’.  Gaza is the land of the Jewish people, not some ransoming chit to be bargained away.  It is to Netanyahu’s eternal shame that he would fail to act in preventing Gaza from being ripped from the Jewish people a second time, the first being his long delayed silence while the Expulsion of 2005 became all but accepted.  It is incomprehensible that the surrender of Gaza should be supported by any political party, to any people, at any time.  For Likud to take such a position in surrendering these Jewish lands a second time to the very psychopaths who made October 7 possible, and who participating in the vile revelries of that great slaughter, should be understood to be as inexplicable as it is unacceptable.  On Yom HaShoah, in the silent moments honoring the memory of the Holocaust and past heroes, the current undertaking to betray the Zionist claim to our ancestral lands, which includes Gaza, screams for a reconsideration.  Min. Smotrich is to be congratulated for sounding this clarion call to make Gaza Jewish again.

By Sha’i ben-Tekoa

Israeli Flag. Photo by Benjamin Istanbuli on UnsplashPhoto by Benjamin Istanbuli on Unsplash

I just read online a lengthy but splendid, historical-legal argument by Karen Stahl-Don establishing the State of Israel in international law as the legal and legitimate sovereign in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, a.k.a. “from the river to sea,” and this year’s Independence Day would be remembered as the best ever if the government had told this to the world, but it never has. And I wonder why not?

The community of Sa Nur in the Shomron, destroyed by the alleged Oslo peace processors, has now been brought back to life, with returnees and I assume new members. And there was Minister Betzalel Smotrich at the rebirth ceremony also calling for the return of Jewish settlement in Gaza, that strip of 25-mile beachfront property which could serve as a solution to the latest violence against Israel by the Muslim goy there, a zone originally meant to be a temporary refuge for war refugees that turned into a permanent, massive terror base for homicidal aggression against the adjacent Jewish communities.

But, oddly, official Israel in its own self-defense under assault by these genocidal Islamic crusaders has never once defended itself by telling the world that the violence directed at Israelis by the gentiles in that Strip, Judea and Samaria is perpetrated on land that is legally in international law Israeli land, and Israel has the right to call for the transfer of these homicidal Jew-hating maniacs out of Eretz Yisrael and resettled wherever the world’s 192 bleeding heart, pro-“Palestinian” countries will have them.

Israel National News reported on Minister Smotrich’s desire in his speech to claim Gaza as a place where Israeli Jews have the right to live again, but the anonymous journalist then added that “Prime Minister Netanyahu has repeatedly insisted this is not going to happen.” In this behavior, he exposed himself as not the bold, proud New Jew, right-wing Zionist refusing to accept passively gentile persecution any more, when this refusal to claim Gaza is just that. It is motivated by the secular Zionist fantasy of proving to the world we Jews are not imperialists ravenous to steal even more Palestinian land then we have already. Israel has no claims on this real estate in the mind of Prime Minister Binyamin ben-Bentzion Netanyahu.

Ask your average, secular Israeli why has Israel never annexed Judea and Samaria and he will answer, “But then we would have to give the Palestinians citizenship and the right to vote in the Knesset or be tarred as a culture of apartheid” — when Israeli Jews are arguably the most racially, genetically-mixed citizenry on earth.

But another, more realpolitik explanation for never claiming legitimate ownership is security: maintaining the status quo since 1967 allows Israel to treat the locals more harshly, under a species of martial law.

Another motivation might also be rooted in the inarticulate and fallacious assumption of the Zionist movement, that one of the causes of antisemitism is calling ourselves the Chosen People. Indeed, many in the hard-core Zionist Left believed antisemitism was the result of the Jewish religion itself, which isolated the Jews inside other nations that made for friction, and like all religions was, in any case, a superstitious narcotic. The secular Zionists believed it was possible to have peace with the Arabs when we jettison our timeless, religious identity and become a normal people. I once saw Shimon Peres interviewed on PBS say, “The purpose of Zionism is the normalization of the Jewish people.”

I am reminded of my first experience of Israel at age 19 two years before the Six-Day War, Israel’s 17th year, and not having been exposed to a Zionist upbringing beyond reading and thoroughly enjoying Leon Uris’s bestseller “Exodus,” so in my first days and weeks in the country, falling in with the elite Ashkenazic Mapai soldiers my age, I was amazed to discover that many did not identity as Jews at all. In their modern Hebrew, a Jew was a religious person, and since they were not religious, they saw themselves as Israelis.

In fact, the late leftist Shulamith Aloni was one of small group who of shallow intellectuals established an association to pressure the Ministry of the Interior to edit the information on them in the matter of their national identity. They wanted “Jewish” removed and replaced by “Israeli.” That was the name of their group: “I am an Israeli.”

It was thus no surprise to learn, years later, that when IDF soldiers in the Six-Day War overran the Temple Mount, climbed to the roof of the Dome of the Rock and hoisted an Israeli flag, socialist Defense Minister Moshe Dayan and soul brother of Aloni ordered it taken down, explaining that the Temple Mount had no religious significance to Israelis, only historic; and in any case, “Who needs this Vatican?”

This is one more ingredient in the secular Zionist character of the prime minister who has stated, if the anonymous A7 journalist is accurate, “multiple times that he does not intend for Israel to resettle in Gaza with Jewish Israelis.”

Notice he did not say “to resettle in Gaza with Israelis,” but “Jewish Israelis” for he knows that the first to do that would be “religious Zionists,” when that couplet is virtually oxymoronic since the original Zionists were overwhelmingly not religious but content to see the Jewish religion destined for the dust bin of history. Ben Gurion famously in the first days of the State allowed, after being begged by rabbis, to grant an exception from army service for several hundred Haredi boys to study Torah, and he did so for immediate political gain but also in the belief that the following year, there would be fewer such boys, and every year thereafter the number would decrease because religion was on the way out.

Today’s Israeli prime minister calls himself in his autobiography a secular person and that is his principal character flaw as the leader of this state. His emotional response to Oct. 7 has been embarrassingly tepid, not militarily, but verbally. On occasion he has called the Muslim Brothers that day “monsters” but he also early on foresaw a better future for the people in the Gaza Strip once Hamas rule has ended.

This is in a class with Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff who believe that the way to treat the people in Gaza after the fighting ends is to build for them a brand-new community, 100,000 new homes with the latest conveniences; neighborhoods with brand-new schools for children with playgrounds for them to play in public parks; full employment for hundreds of thousands of allegedly “innocent Palestinian civilians” who had nothing to do with those terrible Hamas people — except enthusiastically vote into power as their government in 2006.

This is no way to respond to those “merciless” Muslim “savages” which was the vocabulary of Thomas Jefferson, principal author of the American Declaration of Independence, his way of describing the Indians during the American Revolution egged on by the Crown to slaughter American families on the frontier. One serious historian claims that more frontier families during the War were butchered by Indians than rebel soldiers killed by British and Hessian soldiers.

Israel’s prime minister might have raged after Oct. 7 and claimed Gaza as legally in international law belonging to the State of Israel that wants these sadistic barbarians of the Muslim faith to get off Jewish land that they have used, probably every year of Israel’s 78, to launch terrorist murderers into Israel, Oct. 7 now only the most spectacular of their horrors.

The prime minister might also have stood up to President Trump for demanding Israel participate in providing the people there with humanitarian aid. That Israel submitted to this antisemitic demand was outrageous, the behavior of the cringing Diaspora Jew, the early target of scorn by the Zionists. When in history has a victim people defending itself against an aggressor been “morally” obligated to care for the humanitarian needs of the enemy aggressor’s non-combatants who brought them to power?

Trump, Kushner and Witkoff — Donald’s dejudaized golfing partner in the pastime preferred by white Anglo-Saxon gentlemen — dreamed out loud their “visions” for creating a brand-new Gaza Strip to their taste, when the prime minister should have politely and pleasantly, even jocularly, reminded all three that Gaza is Israeli territory, earth baked in the blood of thousands of Israeli dead and wounded soldiers, and Israel will decide its future, which is not building an “Israeli Riviera” with gambling casinos and night clubs featuring half-naked showgirls a la Las Vegas and Donald’ Trump’s Atlantic City.

In sum, it is right for MK Betzalel Smotrich to call for Jews to resurrect Gaza, when it should be not only him but the prime minister and the president demanding respect for Israel’s right in international gentile law to this sliver of land, and Israel’s right to evict this mob of impossibly cruel, vicious, merciless, antisemitic savages, enemies of the humane and civilized Jewish and other people.

PHANTOM NATION: Inventing the “Palestinians” as the Obstacle to Peace is available at Amazon.com in hard cover or a Kindle ebook. His podcasts can be heard on www.phantom-nation.com.


Peloni:  Here is the link to Karen Stahl-Don’s full article on the topic of THE BRITISH MANDATE: DEFINING THE LEGALITY OF JEWISH SOVEREIGNTY OVER JUDEA AND SAMARIA UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

I highly recommend reading the longer version.

April 21, 2026 | 11 Comments »

Leave a Reply

11 Comments / 11 Comments

  1. Thank you to Phantom Nation and all others telling the simple, easy to understand truth about Jewish land rights including Gaze and Judea and Samaria; the biblical, indigneous, historical, legal and moral rights. Netanyahu’s father z’l was a leader in fighting for this recogniton of the truth in his work to have Article 80 included in the UN Charter!!!

  2. I agree with the sentiments offered in this essay but I’d like to point out that Netanyahu does need to keep his eye on the scales. We are already in a 7-front war (as he likes to tell us at every opportunity) and he sees no need to suggest that more enemies join in. Were he to insist right now that Judea and Samaria and the Gaza Strip are Israeli territory, those 192 Hamas favoring countries would bully Israel immediately to give them back to the Palestinians (WHO EXACTLY??). There are currently too many of those 192 allegedly Hamas friendly countries who would be happy to try to free those areas for the Palestinians.

    Netanyahu also has his domestic fight to keep under control. The inhabitants of Tel Aviv and its suburbs don’t care much about J&S&G as long as their style of life is safe. They are safe because the defense management is in Tel Aviv too. They will really not get out of their comfort zone to promote bringing J&S&G into the fold. On the other hand, for some inexplicable reason, they are quite happy to go out and protest the judicial reform.

    The argument that Israel can treat the locals more harshly is nonsense. They are treated as well as they deserve and all complaints are honored by the courts.

    The rest of the world needs to hear the verse about the chosen people to its end. The Israelites (not just the Jews) were chosen to publicize the word of God. They were given a task!

    The author’s identity crisis is actually quite normal. The very “religious” Jews don’t really consider themselves to be Israelis.

    Dayan made the greatest mistake in allowing the Waqf to take over the Temple Mount.

    The suggestion that Netanyahu doesn’t want to resettle the Gaza Strip with Israelis is not worth the paper it’s written on. The next government will probably do exactly that irrelevant of which party is involved. However, building hotels and high rises in Gaza is not the way to resettle the Strip, nor should it be. Nobody will want to go to this terrorist infested place on vacation or for seminars or anything else. If the “Palestinians” are gone, so are the investments.

    Raging about “international law” is a waste of time. The rest of the world couldn’t care less about Netanyahu’s opinion except if it collides with Trump’s. In their minds, international law is what they say it is, like the queen in Alice in Wonderland.

    The humanitarian aid that was provided to the residents of the Gaza Strip since a long time ago (because the Egyptians refused to) was also a big mistake. While humanitarian aid is necessary, Israel has provided much more than its share while at war with them!!

    The same situation is coming about in J&S too. It is past time to move the whole crowd of them from J&S&G to Jordan and rename Jordan to Palestine, which is what it was called not so very long ago. The small part between the “river and the sea” is called Israel as it was for thousands of years.

  3. Netanyahu’s refusal to assert Israel’s claims over Gaza and the Shomron have always been baffling and frustrating. It is mandatory for Israel to assert its sovereignty over these territories, if it’s ever to finally know peace. There are two reasons for this. 1) Unless Israel asserts its sovereignty over those territories, it will never be treated as an equal among the nations. It will be bullied and forever pressured into making suicidal concessions. 2) Its enemies will continue using those territories as incentivizes for capturing more Israeli territory. Now, I guess I know why he’s always disappointed me when it comes to bottom-line issues, like Gaza and the Shomron.

    • @Judeathrives

      Now, I guess I know why he’s always disappointed me when it comes to bottom-line issues, like Gaza and the Shomron.

      I totally agree, unfortunately.

      To be honest, I admire Bibi immensely. No one could have done, and no one would have done, what Bibi did over the past two years in leading the country toward victory amid the contests of war, sedition, and foreign interventions. He is truly the master statesman of our age, and I will forever remain beholden to him for is sizeable accomplishments. Yet, there is an important character trait which defines Bibi’s compass in all things, and that is risk aversion. This was true in the past and it is true today. He is good at calculating the middle road, flying not too high and not too low, and making the long venture possible. Yet, in doing so, the calculations required for such risk aversity requires coming up short on vital ventures which might otherwise rock the boat too violently. So battles such as sovereignty come up short of Bibi’s support so as to make the long term victories more certain, if not more viable. This is why, even as Bibi withstood the combined efforts of the US govt, the US Deep State, the Israeli Deep State, and the Israeli court system, he never once gave the slightest support to retaking control over Gaza, not once. The same will be true viz a viz Shomron.

      So, while I still revere Bibi for the great acts and achievements he has accomplished, I scorn him for his lack of courage and conviction to safeguard Jewish Lands as our own. It is the two sides of the same coin, so to speak. To be honest, it is easy to be lured into judging him by one side or the other of this coin analogy, but that fails to grasp the full truth, IMO of course.

      • Agreed. A most admirable leader but with major deficits. He has no vision for the future. All he wants is quiet and is enslaved to his fantasy of friendship with the Muslims, e.g his Abraham Accords that are much over-sold. His dream of roping the Saudis in does not see that the minute that MbS makes peace with Israel, he paints a sign on his back saying , “Kill me.” But I doubt he wants to go the way of King Abdallah in 1950 murdered by the Mufti on suspion he wants peace with Israel and Sadat in 1981. He does not see that Islam is in essence nothing but another form of Jew-hatred.

  4. But, oddly, official Israel in its own self-defense under assault by these genocidal Islamic crusaders has never once defended itself by telling the world that the violence directed at Israelis by the gentiles in that Strip, Judea and Samaria is perpetrated on land that is legally in international law Israeli land.

    that strip of 25-mile beachfront property which could serve as a solution to the latest violence against Israel by the Muslim goy there,

    But, oddly, official Israel in its own self-defense under assault by these genocidal Islamic crusaders has never once defended itself by telling the world that the violence directed at Israelis by the gentiles in that Strip,

    Muslims are gentiles.
    Muslims are goy.
    Muslims are crusaders.

    Do other Israelis speak this way about Muslims?
    Do they speak this way about Christians?
    Are Goy, Gentile and Crusader names/words/descriptives that apply to Muslims and Christians equally?

    Help me out here.

    • Sure. Always happy to help.

      Muslims and Christians are gentiles (non-Jews). Muslims and Christians are goyim (non-Jewish nations). Muslims and Christians are crusaders (people who make, or have made in the case of Christians, war in the name of their religion. All three terms may be applied equally and accurately to Muslims and Christians.

      • Why did you single out the Christians here?

        people who make, or have made in the case of Christians, war in the name of their religion.

        The Moslems caused the crusades. No two ways about it. However, the Christians continued to try to Christianize Africa and South America and made inroads in Eastern Asia too so it seems to be a human trait to insist on converting anyone they can to their own religion, just like Islam.

        • When I said, “…or have made in the case of the Christians…” I was thinking in terms of Israel, only. Of course, it’s true Christians went to other parts of the world converting anyone they could, or can, today; though, as far as I know, they no longer use the threat of death to “inspire” conversions, as some Muslims do.

      • Not only Christians and Muslims but all non-Jews. The word goy means nation. Hebrew is also very concise and the word can he used to label an individual, as in “he is a goy” which means he is an alien, not a member of the Jewish nation. Every nation in the world has the concept of a goy, not a member of one’s nation. There is nothing insulting about it In fact, one of the first uses in the Bible is to describe the “Jewish goy,” the Jewish nation as a “goy kadosh” a holy people.