Mudar Zahran knows that the Jews treat the Palestinians better than their Arab brethren do. He knows that by defending Jews, he is defending Palestinians and by arguing Jordan is Palestine he is defending both. He tells the same thing to the Arabs through al Jazeera. He is being well received by many in the Arab world. Ted Belman
by Mudar Zahran, STONEGATE INSTITUTE
Are the media actually interested in helping the Palestinians, or really just in bashing Israel? The media’s overkill fixation on bashing Israel hurts not only Jews and any chances for peace, but also Palestinians.
Helen Thomas, dubbed “the First Lady of the Press”, was a renowned veteran reporter, “a trusted source” on White House politics, and for decades, considered a public opinion-maker, when on May 27, 2010, she made anti-Semitic remarks: she wanted Jews to simply “get the hell out of Palestine” and return “Home to Poland, Germany” or “America.”
How had she managed to keep her anti-Semitism out of sight all that time? And to what extent had that affected her reporting, especially on the Arab-Israeli conflict? Also, is Thomas just an isolated case? Or is she just the tip of the iceberg; is there much more of this sentiment prevalent among reporters under the surface? How many anti-Semitic and biased media stars are out there who are more devious than Thomas, and have chosen to keep their anti-Semitism still in the closet?
Thomas went on to claim that Israel treated the Palestinians the way the Nazis had treated the Jews. Thomas, who is of Arab descent, probably knows that this is not true by any means. All she had to do to was check the way her country of heritage, Lebanon, treats the Palestinians versus the way Israel does. As Palestinian refugees in Lebanon are institutionally and systematically discriminated against by both the Lebanese society and the Lebanese state, how come Thomas never mentioned that? Was Thomas actually concerned with the welfare of the Palestinians or with hating Jews?
Some might argue that Thomas’s case was remote; former White House correspondent Sam Donaldson said her comments likely reflected the view of many people of Arab descent. Nonetheless, according to Helen’s own description of herself, she is not really an Arab. Born in 1920 in Kentucky to Lebanese parents, Thomas described her family growing up in Michigan: “We were never hyphenated as Arab-Americans. We were American, and I have always rejected the hyphen and I believe all assimilated immigrants should not be designated ethnically. Or separated, of course, by race, or creed, either. These are trends that ever try to divide us as a people.”
Thomas even emphasized her Americanism in an interview with Rabbi Nesenoff: when he asked her, “Do you speak Arabic?” she responded: “Very little. We were too busy Americanizing our parents….” In other words, Thomas is an all-American journalist; her case is not necessarily an isolated case because she is of an Arab-descent. To the contrary, what is alarming is how Thomas was able to go undetected for her bias an anti-Semitism for over five decades, all while she was contributing to America’s public opinion. The question now is: who else is still is in the closet?
Thomas has not been an exception to the international media, who feed on demonizing Israel and systematically complicating even the potential for peace by painting a demonic picture of the Jewish state. No question, the global media body is eager to jump at any story in which it can swiftly demonize Israel, be it deliberately or simply to catch a juicy story by the end of the day to please the editor in chief. This habit has harmed the Palestinians in many ways, for example: very few media sources are interested in reporting on the inhumane conditions of the Palestinians living in Arab countries. The media re excellent at forgetting the simple fact that most Palestinian “refugees” actually do live in Arab countries and not in Israel.
A major example is the renowned British journalist Robert Fisk, who went to Jordan in 2010 to meet with right-wing Jordanian Bedouins only to come back with an article entitled “Why Jordan Is Occupied by Palestinians.” Since then, this article has been used by Bedouin extremists as the equivalent of Pravda, a Soviet agitprop publication that did not even pretend to be news. Those Bedouins want the Palestinians expelled from Jordan, and Fisk has just given them their dream “15 minutes of fame” in an internationally prominent newspaper. Again, was Mr. Fisk concerned with the Palestinians, or with blaming Israel for everything?
While Fisk is considered a classic example of anti-Israel bias, some younger media stars, or emerging heavyweights do not necessarily seem any different. According to the British newspaper, The Daily Mail, for instance, the relatively young Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, was plunged into anti-Semitic row as he told a journalist he thought a Jewish conspiracy was being worked against him, which “included” the Guardian’s editor Alan Rusbridger. When told Rusbridger was not Jewish, Assange reportedly noted that Rusbridger was “sort of Jewish” because he was related to David Leigh, a Jewish journalist. How do his views and convictions possibly filter down to the way he runs Wikileaks? As it took Helen Thomas close to six decades to come out about her true feelings, this is something that perhaps one can only speculate about.
Anti-Semitic journalists, however, keep surfacing from all professional backgrounds. Take Matt Moss, for example, recently in the New York Times travel section, who in a breath,taking combination of unprofessionalism, prejudice (pre-judging something without so much as a current look at it), lack of curiosity, boasted that although he is Jewish, the only country on the entire planet he does not want to visit is Israel. He did not even have the grace to acknowledge that — in an earlier time, not so long ago, without an Israel as the sole country that offered sanctuary to boatloads of people fleeing the Third Reich’s killing machine while other countries, including the United States, either turned boats away or let them sink — he too might well have ended up in an oven or as a cake of curio soap.
Or take Gregg Easterbrook, who in 2003 was fired from ESPN for a blog he had written for the New Republic Online, in which he described Jews in the film industry, including Disney’s CEO, Michael Eisner, as “Jewish executives who worshiped money above all…by promoting for profit the adulation of violence.”
The list could go on and on, but there is another point.
Thomas’s attitude is not only unkind and unfair to Jews, it is also unfair to Palestinians. The media’s Israel-bashing Jews-haters are not only harming Jews; they are harming the Palestinians as well. They have established a culture of tolerance for Arab abuse of the Palestinians: the 1970 massacres of the Palestinians in Jordan, for example and the 1980s massacres of Palestinians in Lebanon, and the abuse of Palestinians in Syria and Iraq– before and after Saddam’s fall — all received little coverage compared to the media’s overkill fixation on Israel.
How do the media serve the Palestinians when they choose to demonize Israel, the only country that allows the Palestinians not only full freedom of speech and of the press, but also employment at the highest levels, from full membership in Israel’s Parliament [Knesset], to serving as a justice on the Supreme Court, or appointments as Ambassador in the Diplomatic Corps? Do the Turks, for example, do that for their minorities? Do the Egyptians? Does Jordan? Does any Arab country?