Hamas-Linked CAIR intends to use subversive tactics to transform Oklahoma by deploying a deliberate, multi-pronged campaign: 1.) Expand Muslim Political Influence Through Organizing and Coalitions, 2.) Enforce ‘Social Justice’ Norms via Education and Redefinition of Community, and 3.) Reduce Traditional Conservative Power Through Legal and Political Pressure.
By Renee Nal | RAIR Foundation USA | Apr 21, 2026
In a recent episode of the “CAIR on Air” podcast titled “How Muslims & Other Minority Groups Became Political Targets in America w/ Veronica Laizure”, the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) National Deputy Director Edward Ahmed Mitchell sat down with Veronica Laizure, Executive Director of CAIR Oklahoma.
The conversation reveals a clear agenda: Oklahoma is in CAIR’s sights. The speakers lay out plans to reshape the state through legal action, education campaigns, and political organizing. They aim to expand Muslim political influence, enforce “social justice” norms aligned with their ideology, and reduce traditional conservative power in one of America’s reddest states.
CAIR’s Coalition Strategy: Straight from the Muslim Brotherhood’s ‘The Project’
“From forming partnerships between groups with diverging ideolgies [sic] and navigating tensions among diverse coalitions, this conversation provides an inside look at the ups and downs of coalition building amid the fight against fascism.”
This concept is exactly what was prescribed by “The Project“, the 1982 subversive Muslim Brotherhood blueprint to turn America into an Islamic state by advising Islamic groups to form temporary, tactical partnerships with ideologically opposed movements, including secular nationalists and left-wing coalitions, on shared battlegrounds like the fight against fascism (or colonialism/Zionism), without ever forming genuine alliances, extending trust, or ceding leadership.
The Project explicitly instructs: accept limited cooperation “without however having to form alliances,” maintain only “limited contacts between certain leaders on a case by case basis,” give them “no allegiance,” and ensure “the Islamic movement must be the origin of the initiatives and orientations taken.”
In other words, CAIR’s public embrace of coalition-building with divergent groups follows the doctrine: use non-Islamic partners as useful instruments to advance the cause, while preserving full strategic independence and ultimate control.
It is up to USA to adjust their laws to remigrate immigrants who came to USA to usurp the existing government. With the existing law structure, they are “happy” to allow the insurgency to exist.
The law should be tuned to allow the government to deport immigrants who came, not to assimilate but rather to replace the existing laws and structures, including their progeny.