IS ZELENKO RIGHT?

By Ted Belman

I took the trouble to listen to Zelenko quite closely.  I found that he accuses the decision makers and of those who advise them of enormous malevolence and improper motives. He has no proof for this.  His argument basically is that the vaccines are so dangerous or potentially dangerous that anyone who didn’t have such motives would not impose them. That’s argument, not proof.  He should have stayed focused on the vaccines themselves.

He says that anyone who evaluates whether to use a specific therapeutic must ask three questions;

  • Is it safe to use
  • does it work
  • do you need it

This could be encapsulated in the Hippocratic oath “Do no harm”.

Is it safe?

Preliminary data answers “no”.

Some people are getting blood clots and dying.

mRNA vaccines “will kill most people” through heart failure, 62% of vaccinated people already show microscopic blood clots

According to an Israeli preliminary study when pregnant women in their first trimester are jabbed, it increases their miscarriage rate by a factor of 8.  I have looked for corroboration of this but haven’t found it. But is a minor point in any event.

As for the long term, animal studies showed that the vaccines destroyed their immune system causing many to die. Whether the same will happen with humans, remains to be seen.

There is some evidence already that the vaccines will impact your health in the long term and shorten your life.

COVID-19: Why Are American Scientists Silent on This?  This article reviews some of the articles and studies on the  deaths attributable to the vaccine.

Harvard Epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff on Vaccine Passports, the Delta Variant, and the COVID ‘Public Health Fiasco

Do the COVID Vaccines Work or Not?

A worldwide Genocide is unfolding: Expert vaccine scientist Dr. Vanden Bossche

mRNA Vaccine Inventor Shares Viral Thread Showing COVID Surge In Most-Vaxxed Countries

‘CDC overwhelmed with vaccine adverse effect reports’

What is the true number of vaccine-related deaths?
A massive surge in COVID vaccine deaths

Vaccines Have Already Killed Up to 50,000 Americans; Whistleblowers

Exposing the Media’s Plot to Hide Record Vaccine Deaths and Deceive Americans

Why Are Media Ignoring Data Showing Massive COVID-19 Vaccine Death Spike?

Why I Refuse to Be Vaccinated 

Israel’s Covid Vaccine Campaign

Only time will tell how dangerous it is. So why take the risk?

Do the COVID Vaccines Work or Not?

Does it work

The most at risk population are people over 75 who, once vaccinated experience a reduction of death rate by over 7.5 %. At the same time people who got vaccinated showed an increase in infection.

“Yet, Israeli researchers just announced that the mRNA vaccines are only 39% effective and it’s the vaccinated people who are being hospitalized! The CDC just admitted that the PCR tests don’t work to diagnose Covid.” 

Do you need it?

According to the CDC, children under 18 have a survival rate of 99.98%. Young adults (18 to 45) have a survival rate of 99.95%.  So obviously they don’t need it for these groups.

Nor should it be used on this group because they are potential carriers.

Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin

The benefit of using the vaccine may or may not be a justification for the use of the vaccination on the elderly but there is a much better option, namely the proper use of the Hydroxychloroquine or Invermectin as a prophylactic or cure in the first few days of symptoms.

Hydroxychloroquine And The Burden of Proof

Ivermectin is a very reliable prophylactic against Covid 19

Let’s all be honest about hydroxychloroquine

‘Mortality dropped 8-fold with use of those two drugs’

Banned

But their use has been banned in many countries including the US and Israel. Why?

The Big Lie prevents the endorsement of the Zelenko Protocol

On balance I would argue that the use of the vaccine is not vindicated or validated.

Particularly when you have a proven alternative that is many times more effective and very cheap.

August 15, 2021 | 17 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

17 Comments / 17 Comments

  1. My disappeared comment:
    Reader
    August 16, 2021 at 11:35 pm

    Another guess as to why they are pushing vaccines and banning treatments.

    Maybe their plan is to make the 7 billion sick with the virus/spike protein/mutated variants and then, when the time is right, rename the drugs in Dr. Zelenko’s et al. protocols, jack up the prices on the “new wonder drugs suddenly invented by our heroic Pharma” and start treating those of the 7 billion who are still alive after the vaccination phase heroically trying to save them from the “evil virus”.

    Can you imagine the money that could be made on this?!

    And the required population reduction will be accomplished successfully also as the result of the vaccine phase making Bill Gates (and others like him) very happy and much, much wealthier than before.

    Just a wild guess.

    The one thing I cannot understand no matter how hard I try – what’s in it for Israel?

  2. re Zelenco – i saw very interesting and seeming highlevel roundable with dr malone, dr fleming, dr mccullough, dr zelenco, dr merritt, and 10 other doctors. dr Zelenco was one of the ‘doctors on the street’ – the guy who treated 1000’s of patients with covid. I thought even though the others, exp fleming and malone had high level science based discussions, zelenco still made very valid if not most important points. 1) don’t take the shots 2) treat early. In this our governments are totally failing us as they are pusing/ mandating shots and avoiding early treatment options, approval and information disemination.

  3. @murray139
    The original study intentionally obscured their data – I read it myself. I noticed that this fact check group did not reprint the original data table showing how anyone misconstrued what was stated. They also did not state that data was incorrectly tabulated. I agree with your conclusion on this fact check, as most fact checks are employed by either one of the tech giants or Pharma. The findings of that study was greatly alarming, but it was just one study, and could be an outlier, but the fact that they intentionally obscured the data by combining two data values, suggests they were aware of what they were hiding, a fair conclusion, I think. Until this study is challenged by another study with alternate findings, I think it is reasonable to accept the worrisome data as significant enough to warrant concern pending further findings, as it is not the only point of concern regarding female reproductive issues. The menstrual changes with heavy menstrual flows have been postulated as possibly spontaneous abortions from sexually active women who are unaware they are pregnant. Also the increased presence of spike in the ovaries/placenta raises all these concerns even higher. It is now 9 months, post vaccine rollout and 2.3 billion people have been vaccinated. There should be some significant studies, many of them, on these matters. They don’t need to be elaborate or expensive trial studies. Why is Pharma and FDA/CDC/NIH not funding such projects to support the vaccine program that they claim is so safe, especially as the safety data is marginal at best.

  4. Reference to miscarriages increase by a factor of 8 probably derives from reports of a study in July 2021. This link discusses and purports to debunk the 82% figure for 1st and 2 nd trimester recipients of vaccine.
    “http://https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.thejournal.ie/pregnant-women-covid-vaccine-82-first-trimester-factcheck-5495371-Jul2021/%3famp=1”

    However I think the ‘debunking’ is a confusing mish mash.

  5. Israel’s Health Minister: There will be COVID shots in schools

    Some amazing comments under the article!

    BTW, I read somewhere (possibly in a comment under a JPOST article) that the wife of Rand Paul (who rails against vaccinations or whatever) has just invested in Gilead.

    Someone should check the Israeli politicians’ investment portfolios – this might help explain their incredible eagerness to vaccinate the whole country.

    P.S.
    Correction: I keep typing “POB” in my posts for some reason when I mean “PTB” (Powers That Be), I apologize for the typo.

  6. leanmarc@ii.net

    the covid shots do not stop transmission – spread of covid … …why do the authorities and the citizenry of Israel , USA ,Uk , Australia etc accept digital passports with different rights for ‘vaccinated’ and ‘unvaccinated’?

    Obviously, because it is supremely important for the POB to administer these vaccines to 100% of their population while using the usual divide-and-rule techniques.

    WHY is it so important to them to achieve this supreme goal in spite of having to sacrifice their economies, infrastructure, and the health (even the lives) of their citizens – is anybody’s guess.

  7. A very balanced and fair examination of both the pros and cons of vaccination, Ted. The decision as to whether to be vaccinated or not should be a matter of individual choice. Each individual may make that choice based on such considerations as his/her age, comorbidities and preconditions, possible allergies, past medical history, and the evidence concerning the effectiveness and safety of the different vaccines at the time that the individual is making his/her decision.

    Governments should not bully or force people into being vaccinated. In the event that the “vaccines skeptics” are eventually proven right that the vaccines will harm the health of many otherwise healthy people who were given them, compulsary vaccinations may turn into a disaster.

    If governments as well as private corporations respect the right of individual choice, I believe such a dsiaster is much less likely. Some experts believe that herd immunity, which is they key to keeping the number of serious illnesses caused by the Covid virus to the smallest possible number (these experts don’t believe that the illness will ever completely disappear) is more likely to be achieved if the vaccination rate is less than 100%. Perhaps about 60 per cent, the same percentage as the average number of vaccinations for influenza (which in any case may often be misdiagnosed as cv2-19), might turn out to be the “ideal” number of people who shouldbe vaccinated every year.

    But all this is conjecture. The world plunged into a massive vaccination campaign without knowing much either about the illness itself or the long-term impact of the vaccines. Not a good way to proceed.

  8. @retired22
    Here is a very powerful comparison between how India and the US have pursued their fight against SARS-Cov2. Everyone should read this devastating comparison.

    India’s Ivermectin Blackout
    by Tyler Durden
    Friday, Aug 13, 2021 – 11:10 PM

    Authored by Justus R Hope, MD. via TheDesertReview.com,
    Ivermectin Wins in India

    News of India’s defeat of the Delta variant should be common knowledge. It is just about as obvious as the nose on one’s face. It is so clear when one looks at the graphs that no one can deny it.

    Yet, for some reason, we are not allowed to talk about it. Thus, for example, Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.

    Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill.

    Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning http://www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.

    One can see the bias in Wikipedia by going on the “talk” pages for each subject and reading about the fierce attempts of editors to add these facts and the stone wall refusals by the “senior” editors who have an agenda. And that agenda is not loyalty to your health.

    The easy way to read the “talk” page on any Wikipedia subject is to click the top left “talk” button. Anyone can then review the editors’ discussions.

    There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India. When I discussed the dire straits that India found itself in early this year with 414,000 cases per day, and over 4,000 deaths per day, and how that evaporated within five weeks of the addition of Ivermectin, I am often asked, “But why is there no mention of that in the news?”

    Yes, exactly. Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.

    Perhaps NPR is trying so hard because NPR is essentially a government mouthpiece. The US government is “all-in” with vaccines with the enthusiasm of a 17th century Catholic Church “all-in” with a Geocentric Model of the Universe disputing Galileo. Claiming that India’s numbers are inaccurate might distract from the overwhelming success of Ivermectin.

    But in the end, the truth matters. It mattered in 1616, and it matters in 2021.

    [see link below for graphs – they are important]
    The graphs and data from the Johns Hopkins University CSSE database do not lie.

    On the contrary, they provide a compelling trail of truth that no one can dispute, not even the NIH, CDC, FDA, and WHO.

    Just as Galileo proved with his telescope that the earth was NOT the center of the Universe in 1616; today, the data from India shows that Ivermectin is effective, much more so than the vaccines. It not only prevents death, but it also prevents COVID infections, and it also is effective against the Delta Variant.

    In 1616, you could not make up the telescopic images of Jupiter and its orbiting moons, nor could you falsify the crescent-shaped images of Venus and Mercury. These proved that the earth was NOT the center of the Universe – a truth the Catholic Church could not allow.

    …..

    The rest of the article can be read at:
    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout
    Well worth the time.

  9. Read about the very drastic drop in fatalities in India after the Indians
    stopped vaccinating with Remdisivir ,with horrible results, & started using Ivermectin instead!
    Why are the authorities in the west leaving no stone unturned in suppressing this information,if not conspiracy & collusion?

  10. @Ted
    How exactly would one prove malevolence? Would you require taped recordings of meetings planning this malevolence or equivalent written documentation? The very act of withholding treatments once they are known to effective is malevolent. Does one require a conspiracy as proof?

  11. @Ted
    Excellently stated review of the vaccines and the lack of treatments. Many questions remain while people are left to die without available treatments being allowed to be prescribed to save their lives. It is one thing if a doctor believes a treatment is not safe, but for the govt to withhold these treatments when they have been prescribed billions of times over 40-60 yrs, it begs a certain speculation. Still these speculative views should never become the focus of any productive discussion, as you have quite excellently demonstrated. Very well done, and thank you for analyzing the topic so thoroughly and with a measured balance that pursues the topic at hand, namely the govts choice to vaccinate while preventing any reasonable treatments or prophylaxis.

  12. @leanmarc@ii.net
    A better question is why will these govts who are so dedicated to protecting their public with these authoritarian passports and a vaccine, with questionable efficacy and known safety issues, not allowing their doctors to freely use safe medications to treat their public while they are left to suffer and die, needlessly?

    But I like your question too. I think the answers are likely not unrelated.

  13. question: we know from evidence that the covid shots do not stop transmission – spread of covid. we have known this was mentioned at least since the trials.
    so, why do the authorities and the citizenry of Israel , USA ,Uk , Australia etc accept digital passports with different rights for ‘vaccinated’ and ‘unvaccinated’?