Op-Ed: A country ruled by its judiciary cannot win the fight against terror
Israel was not established to be a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural liberal democracy. It was established to be the state of the Jewish people.
By Aviel Sheyin-Stevens, INN
Israel was not established to be a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural liberal democracy. It was established to be the state of the Jewish people. As stated in the Declaration of Independence: to give expression to the “natural right of the Jewish people to be masters of their own fate… in their own sovereign state.” Israel will not remain Jewish if it does not retain its status as the nation-state of Jews, with the exclusive source of sovereignty being the Jewish people — a Jewish state where minorities live with equal rights.
Many feel there is a lack of leadership in Israel to deal effectively with issues that endanger public security. The Israeli government is often blamed, but in many aspects of security it does not have the authority.
The justices of the Supreme Court and the attorney general are the real leaders in Israel. They can subvert government authority, and often do.
In Israel, the legislature is not sovereign to legislate, and the executive lacks actual control to execute the instructions of the legislature. The Supreme Court has seized the government’s power to enforce border controls, and to determine policies on commercial matters, consumer protection, education, health, incarceration, etc. It has also seized the Israel Lands Authority’s power to determine policies for allotting state lands.
Read more…