Premeditated merger. Part of the New World Order

How leaders are stealthily transforming USA into North American Union

© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Can it really be possible that Americans are witnessing a governmental program designed to merge – slowly but surely – the United States, Mexico and Canada?

That question is generating a major amount of below-the-media-radar buzz. In recent months, e-mails and telephone calls have poured into radio talk shows and congressional offices asking: Is there a plan to create a “North American Union”? Will a new currency, the “amero,” replace the dollar? Is it true that Mexicans will now get Social Security?

Yet Congress (except for a few representatives like Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul) as well as the establishment press (with notable exceptions like CNN’s Lou Dobbs) turn a blind eye – despite major evidence mounting daily.

[This is in line with the New World Order we have been discussing lately.]

Just recently, for example, confirmation surfaced that the U.S. government is indeed planning on providing full Social Security benefits to Mexicans – which critics predict will bankrupt the already-shaky system. And a report by the powerful Council on Foreign Relations, regarded by many as something of a “shadow government,” has called for a massive transfer of wealth from the U.S. to Mexico and the establishment of a “security perimeter” around North America – rather than securing America’s borders with Mexico and Canada. CONTINUE

January 30, 2007 | 9 Comments »

9 Comments / 9 Comments

  1. In the index on the CFR website, Canada and Mexico do not have separate entries; there is only “North America”.
    This cannot be a mistake.

  2. Laura,
    It is not paranoia. You can read it for yourself on SPP.gov This website has all the information confirming the union.
    Renee

  3. Paranoid conspiracy theory is exactly what this is, as well as a ploy for Joseph Farah to sell subscriptions to “Whistleblower” magazine.

  5. The CFR (and its sister internationalist organization Bilderberg) is the government behind the scenes in Washington and Brussels (EU-NATO)!

    It gets worse: the CFR and Bilderberg is the mainstream media! They own it!

    Is the undeniable fact that these members of the CFR & Bilderberg et al – both past and present- happen to be in key positions of power in the US & EU governments for over half a century a “conspiracy theory”?

    Is their ownership and membership of the corporate media, banking,finance,NGO’s etc. a “conspiracy theory“?

    Absolutely not. It’s a simple irrefutable fact, not a theory.

    So, is what these internationalists currently do and have been doing since before World War 2 a “conspiracy”?

    That depends on how you define the word “conspiracy”.

    Let’s see:

    Do these people meet in secret? Yes, they most certainly do (annually or bi-annually in different hotels every year for over half a century where all of the regular hotel staff are cleared out before each meeting, replaced with their own security vetted & approved staff and where normally unheard of military-scale security is enforced).

    Do they endeavor to keep everything they discuss a secret? Yes, absolutely, it’s written into their organization’s constitutions – and where not written explicitly it is implicitly understood by all members (on pain of ostracization – being made a permanent pariah -in other words highly likely complete ruin of a member’s political career and aspirations).

    Do they want to create a global supranational collectivist (corporate) system of government (a.k.a “one-world government” or “New World Order”) sacrificing the individual sovereignty of nation-states like Israel, Serbia and the US into a global supranational collectivist system or “one world government”?

    Yes, irrefutably so.They have even admitted it and bragged about it amongst themselves for decades!

    Has the mainstream media for the last 50+years reported even once what goes on inside their meetings?

    NO.

    Has the mainstream media even discussed the mere fact that the most powerful politicians and business leaders in the world are conducting meetings in utmost secrecy every year for nearly 60 years?

    NO.

    Isn’t it their solemn duty or at least “job” to keep us informed of their secret plans and expose corruption and abuse of power at the highest levels?

    Well, of course. But how can they report the truth? They are part of the corrupt globalist “One World” system!

    Not that any genuine “leaks” (not the phony ones)concerning their collectivist agenda to the so-called “free press” would get publicized by reporters anyway, since the mainstream media is run by mega-corporations whose board members and/or key journalists in most cases are themselves members of Bilderberg,CFR,Trilateral Commission, RIAA, and other globalist collectivist internationalist groups ad infinitum, ad nauseam.

    But watch them “leak” extremely sensitive information damaging to the national security of sovereign nation-states all the time whilst saying nothing about the globalist power elite meetings!!

    Here is a list of all CFR members in government,banking,industry,finance, media,education,NGO’s and other big business corporations for 2006 and their identities.

    As Randy has pointed out on numerous occasions, it’s in reality an “OPEN” conspiracy (a mindset of shared values and goals) since they treat the masses with contempt: brainwashing them with meaningless infotainment on TV: sport, talk shows, so-called “reality TV” shows like “Survivor”, “American Idol”, and the MTV popular music culture of sex,drugs,and decadent lifestyles.

    Of course “there is no power elite” one might say. “I haven’t seen them mentioned in the news-papers,magazines or on TV, so they must not exist!”

  6. Simon,

    You’re right; this is why there has been no real effort to enforce border security or stop the movement of illegals since it is facilitating the integration of North American. People south of the US border are more conditioned to control and readily accept strong government impositions into their lives. The elitist desire their presence in the US because they are easily manipulated and as they become a larger part of society their influence tips the scales in favor of a big controlling federal authority.

    One of the dangers of open borders is that it will be much easier for the terrorist to move in and out. Crime in Mexico is so ramped that they will not have any problem obtaining help from drug lords and corrupt officials for a price – many of whom already hate the US and cheer attacks against America.

  7. The integration of the North American Continent has been underway for decades.

    Under any circumstances it is probably inevitable. In fact the Americanization of significant numbers of Mexicans is probably helping.

  9. A majority of people have heard the phrase “New World Order” but associate it either with conspiracy theorist or an unrealistic vision of the first president Bush.

    Actually the first president to begin using the term New World Order in the same context was Woodrow Wilson and under that terminology it has been a goal openly aspired to in elitist circles ever since.

    “On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb stated on The Charlie Rose Show that:

    “… you [Charlie Rose] had me on [before] to talk about the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It’s one world now. The Council [CFR] can find, nurture, and begin to put people in the kinds of jobs this country needs. And that’s going to be one of the major enterprises of the Council under me….” [In other words, they hand pick Rhodes scholars and people from Ivy League schools — Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government who are then promoted, tracked, and if approved of sent to the top in politics and other arenas, and they admit it right on television. – RT]

    “The thrust towards global government can be well-documented but at the end of the twentieth century it does not look like a traditional conspiracy in the usual sense of a secret cabal of evil men meeting clandestinely behind closed doors. Rather, it is a “networking” of like-minded individuals in high places to achieve a common goal….” – Prof. D.L. Cuddy [It is an “open conspiracy” perpetrated right in front of you – RT]

    Cuddy wrote a condensed history of NWO events over the last century compiled largely of quotes and historical records which can serve as a basic ‘New World Order for Dummies.’ It contains a multitude of verifiable facts that irrefutably shows that a movement does exist:

    A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

    by D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
    Arranged and Edited by John Loeffler

    In the mainline media, those who adhere to the position that there is some kind of “conspiracy” pushing us towards a world government are virulently ridiculed. The standard attack maintains that the so-called “New World Order” is the product of turn-of-the-century, right-wing, bigoted, anti-semitic racists acting in the tradition of the long-debunked Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, now promulgated by some Militias and other right-wing hate groups.

    The historical record does not support that position to any large degree but it has become the mantra of the socialist left and their cronies, the media.

    The term “New World Order” has been used thousands of times in this century by proponents in high places of federalized world government. Some of those involved in this collaboration to achieve world order have been Jewish. The preponderance are not, so it most definitely is not a Jewish agenda.

    For years, leaders in education, industry, the media, banking, etc., have promoted those with the same Weltanschauung (world view) as theirs………..Continue Reading The Historical Record Of The NWO Here

    When the CFR says “It is one world now” they are right. People look for the appearance of a single massive government but there is no need for one governmental figurehead if you have a world order of nations bound to collective action in pursuing the same agenda with one mind. They call it “international consensus,” and it does sound good, but what they actually mean is “NO sovereignty.” Remember that every time you hear the phrase used.

Comments are closed.