SCOTUS Blocks “Basically Everything that Would Make Election a lot More Secure”

Peloni:  SCOTUS strikes down effort to secure elections in time for the next election.  Why is it that election security continues to not be a priority in the US?  Note the language of the Supreme Court ruling by Justice Brett Kavanaugh to describe the “rushed implementation” to secure the election results in the coming election as being “arbitrary and capricious”.

Countering this, please take note of Justice Samuel Alito‘s response at the bottom to the SCOTUS judgement which clarifies the fact that the built in obstructions in the process of judicial review was the cause of the delayed implementation and Kavanaugh‘s objections of the “arbitrary and capricious” nature of the implementation.  I noted before the 2024 election that the most pivotal policy for the American Republic in Trump’s second term would be to secure the elections and thereby return the arbitrary and capricious effect of election fraud back to the standard of governance by consent of the governed.  In recognizing the loss of any legislative changes to the election standards in the US are now backed by a judicial block on Presidential authority to effect a similar outcome, it seems the status quo in American election standards is as secure as ever.

Noting this as a serious setback for liberty in America would seem to be rather understated evaluation of this ruling.  And of course, what begins in Washington never stays in Washington.

Video Loads Below

? HOLY SMOKES ALITO IS FURIOUS.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito just issued a SCATHING rebuke of the Court blocking Trump's USPS mail-in ballot rules, RIPPING activist judges for imposing the time constraints rather than the underlying EO actually being illegal!

"The… pic.twitter.com/t7TmxbrQ0l

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 14, 2026

Text: 

HOLY SMOKES ALITO IS FURIOUS.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito just issued a SCATHING rebuke of the Court blocking Trump’s USPS mail-in ballot rules, RIPPING activist judges for imposing the time constraints rather than the underlying EO actually being illegal!

“The plaintiff States cannot claim the TIMING of the rule tilts the equities in their favor when they, and courts hearing their claims, are RESPONSIBLE for so much of the delay.”

“Not only was the Government subject to MONTHS of premature litigation and a series of injunctions that this Court later determined were likely issued WITHOUT JURISDICTION — the Government had to wait nearly another full MONTH for this Court to issue its decision so holding.”

“The District Court issued a nationwide injunction based on claims asserted by several plaintiff organizations that likely lack standing.”

“The District Court entered several injunctions months later prohibiting the Government from undertaking that rulemaking.”

Alito also went into the PRECISE reasons why the mail-in rule is actually constitutional.

Man, I am going to miss him when he retires!