A TEN PART COURSE Be sure to watch this introduction. It is a wonderful overview of the threat. Then read Part 8.


The Obama administration has greatly exacerbated the penetration of the U.S. government achieved during the George W. Bush administration. This part of the course will concentrate on illustrative examples of Muslim Brotherhood-associated individuals who have been allowed access to – and, in some cases, given positions In the Obama administration. This part is a case study of Rashad Hussain, Huma Abedin, Daliah Mogahed, Kifa Mustapha, Momamed Elibiary, and Mohamed Magid. As we will see, taken together, such people and policy initiatives have advanced considerably the Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihad against the United States, here at home and overseas.


  • The precedents, personnel and policies promoted during the George W. Bush administration have metastasized dramatically under his successor.
  • Some individuals with close personal and professional ties to the Muslim Brotherhood have been appointed to senior and influential positions in the Obama administration.  Others have been given access in more informal advisory roles.
  • Six of this Islamist cohort are profiled in the course: Special Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation Rashad Hussein; Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Huma Abedein; Presidential advisor Dalia Mogahed; FBI Citizen’s Academy graduate Kifah Mustafa; Homeland Security Advisory Committee Member Mohamed Elibiary and Homeland Security Countering Violent Extremism Working Group Member Mohamed Magid.
  • Such individuals have clearly had an impact on U.S. policy under President Obama in ways that advance the Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihad and the efforts of other Islamists to compel our submission to shariah.


  1. What is a hafiz of the Quran and what are the implications of one serving in a senior position in the U.S. government?
  2. Should the fact that an individual has family members in prominent positions with Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organization preclude them from serving in the U.S. government?
  3. Can shariah-adherent Muslims honestly swear to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”?  Is it realistic to expect them to fulfill that oath?
  4. What are the implications of the President of the United States taking advice from a woman who believes “The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or justice for women, with sharia compliance”?
  5. Should individuals identified as unindicted co-conspirators in terrorism financing be precluded from participating in such community outreach initiatives as the FBI’s “citizen academies”?
  6. Should a Muslim member of the Department of Homeland Security’s Advisory Committee who has been given a security clearance be held to the same standards for safeguarding classified information as others with such access?
  7. Should membership in and leadership of the largest Muslim Brotherhood front in the United States – the Islamic Society of North America – disqualify someone from serving in official or advisory capacities in the federal or any state government?
May 18, 2012 | 3 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  1. @ James B – Canada:

    There is not a single example of a U.S. election that really did turn either way on the basis of the “Jewish vote”, with the possible exception of the election of 1960. In the case of the most recent election, if every Jew who voted in ’08, cast their vote for McCain, Obama still probably would have won. It would have been a close election, but still, the end result would have been the same.

    This goes back a long way.

    The Jews perferred Truman over Eisenhower, and loved Adlai Stevenson, but Eisenhower won two terms anyway. The Jews hated Nixon, and that may have made a difference in ’60, but Nixon went on to win twice as well, while Johnson won in a landslide over Goldwater in ’64.

    Carter, anti-Semite SOB that he was, blamed the Jews for his loss in ’80, even though he still got 65% of their vote that time, and the election was so lopsided that again, even if he’d got 100%, it would not have saved him.

    Reagan won in a landslide in ’84, without the Jewish vote. Bush won in ’88 without the Jewish vote. The Jewish vote was not decisive in ’92 or ’96; the recession of the early 90s left Bush the Elder mortally wounded, and by ’96, a booming economy left Clinton with a comfortable margin.

    The Jews HATED Bush the Younger with a passion – his challenger even had a Jewish running mate – but Bush won anyway, and then a second term to boot.

    If the election were held today, Obama would get 62% of the Jewish vote. That is too high; one is too many. But it would still be the worst any Democrat did since the end of WW2. I’ve heard credible rumors that Jewish fundraising for Obama is WAY down from ’08.

    Things are moving in the right direction. These habits won’t change overnight. Jews like me are working on this.

    Anyway, barring a third-party run by Ron Paul that fractures the GOP vote, or perhaps Obama hitting Iran successfully, I don’t see Obama getting another term. Romney will win. He’s already pulling ahead according to Rasmussen, about the only major polling organization I trust. And he has hardly begun to fight yet.

    That Newsweek cover was the kiss of death. I can’t imagine why they thought that would help Obama; just shows how out of touch his lackeys in the media really are.

    Anyway, don’t anybody here tell Obama that the Jewish vote is not decisive. It might confuse him.

  2. We know that not every Muslim is a politicized extremist. I think Huma Abedein on Hillary’s staff is married to a Mr. Weiner, formerly of congress, who emailed pictures of his body parts to various women and was forced to resign in a sex scandal. In this case, it was the Jew who screwed up. Hillary would never tolerate anyone on her staff who had questionable credentials. Perhaps these Muslims are well known in the administration or they would never have been allowed to get close to the president.

  3. Thank Hashem that Jews only number 2% of American voters. Unfortunately they are scattered well over the US like rats so they possess the power to do damage. Pray that the rest of Americans will shun the Democrats in sufficient numbers.