God’s Gift of Unalienable Rights & Article VI of the Constitution:
By Publius Huldah , CFP
This is an encouraging paper, because it explains the moral and constitutional justifications to stop the islamization of our country.
We face a grave threat – the Muslims are infiltrating our country and taking over. We seem powerless to resist: Our governments won’t acknowledge the threat; we are told Muslims have “constitutional rights” to come here, proselytize everywhere, build mosques, and implement shariah in their communities and in the public square; and our governments are letting them do it.
The Muslims seek to replace our Constitution with shariah – their totalitarian political, economic, military, social & legal system – with the goal of incorporating our Country into a global Islamic caliphate.
They are making progress in islamicizing our Country because we are not resisting.
And the dreadful message we are getting from all sources is that our Constitution renders us powerless to resist islamization.
But read on, and I will show you how our Constitution & Declaration of Independence – properly understood – actually give our federal, State & local governments justification and authority to stop the islamization of our Country. Once we understand two things, it becomes clear what we may – and must – do:
One : Islam is not a “religion” in the sense we understand religion. Islam is about TOTAL POWER. It is a system which controls every aspect of the lives of those who have the misfortune to be subjected to it. It masquerades as a religion, but once we understand that it is just another totalitarian system – like soviet communism, we can deal with it and defeat it.
Once in place, Islam is enforced with stone-age barbarism. It masquerades as a religion to recruit gullible fools who become suicide bombers, and to provide “cover” for officials in the Western countries who, indoctrinated with the Lies of multiculturalism & political correctness, look for an excuse to do nothing.
Two : We must understand Our Founding Principles – these are our Sword & Shield – that (1) Rights come from God alone, (2) Muslims do not have the right to divest us of our Rights, and (3) the purpose of civil government is to secure the Rights God gave us.
Now let us learn more of our Sword and Shield.
1. Let us first consider Our Rights. What are our rights, and where do they come from? The Constitution? The First Ten Amendments? NO! The Declaration of Independence says:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, …
Those words are golden: Our Rights come from God Who Created the Universe; and the purpose of civil government is to secure the Rights GOD gave us.
- God gave us many Rights: Life! Liberty! Pursuit of Happiness!
- To work and enjoy the fruits of our own labors. To earn, inherit and keep private property.
- To demand that the civil authorities obey the Law – and to hold them accountable when they don’t.
- To have a civil government which protects our God given rights, protects us from invasion and criminals, but gives fair trials to accused persons.
- Equal treatment under the law: Courts are not to favor the rich, or the poor, or males or females.
- God means for us to enjoy life! Healthy food, wine and strong drink (in moderation); attractive dress for women, the marriage relation between man & woman, prosperity, and liberty!
As long as we obey the criminal laws (don’t murder, steal, bear false witness, and the like), we have the right to be left alone.
Liberty is the rule in God’s Model for civil government. That is why our Liberty Bell quotes Leviticus 25:10 – “Proclaim LIBERTY throughout all the Land unto all the Inhabitants thereof.”
2. Do Muslims respect the rights God gave us?
Life? Theirs is a culture of death: murder, honor killings & suicide bombers.
Liberty? Theirs is a culture where women are slaves and prisoners, little girls toys for old men, and conversion to Christianity a capital offense.
Pursuit of Happiness? Theirs is a culture of torture & sadism. Young Muslim girls in America who talked to non-Muslim boys were shot to death by their father in the back seat of his taxicab. Wife-beating is commonplace. Women who don’t cover their hair are lashed. Women are mutilated and maimed on the faces and even in their private places.
Freedom of Speech? Theirs is a culture where criticizing Islam leads to a terrible death.
You can go down the list: For every Right God gave us, the Muslims take it away.
Let’s look at just one God-given right: The Right to a fair trial:
Bearing false witness is condemned. (The Ten Commandments);
The evidence of two or more witnesses is required to prove a case (Deut 19:15 & Matthew 18:16);
Public trials are required (Exodus 18:13); &
Judges are required to be fair, impartial, & without favoritism. (Deut. 1:16-17).
Do Muslims respect this God-given right to a fair trial? NO! In Iran, judges in “morals” cases (adultery) are allowed to make their own subjective determinations that a person is guilty even in the absence of any evidence!
Do Muslims have the “right” to impose in this Country a shariah system which takes away the rights GOD gave us? No! God did not give Muslims the “right” to take away from us, the rights He gave us!
3. We are told Muslims have a “First Amendment right” to build mosques, proselytize, and implement shariah here. But is that what the First Amendment says? No! Let’s read it:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The First Amendment doesn’t grant any rights to anybody! All it does is prohibit CONGRESS from making laws about religion, speech, the press, or assembly!
So Muslims do not have a “First Amendment right” to build mosques, proselytize, and implement shariah here.
4. Not only do Muslims claim the “right” to impose shariah in the Muslim communities springing up throughout our Country, they also claim the “right” to impose shariah law in the public square: They demand shariah compliant financial institutions, foot baths in public places, that wine, sausages, and the like be banned from their presence, that they be allowed to shut down public streets for “prayers”, etc.
Do Muslims have the “right” to apply their law here? No! Art. VI, clause 2 of Our Constitution says:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
OUR Constitution and laws authorized by OUR Constitution are the supreme law of this land – and anything to the contrary must fall. It violates Our Constitution for Muslims to practice shariah here! Muslims who thus seek to overthrow Our Constitution and replace it with shariah are guilty of criminal sedition. The federal government has the duty to prosecute them for sedition – or deport them.
5. Can the federal or state or local governments properly extend to Muslims a “right” to build mosques & proselytize here? No! Because The Declaration of Independence says the purpose of civil government is to secure the rights GOD gave us. Muslims seek to take away our God-given Rights. Civil government is supposed to protect us from those who seek to divest us of our Rights.
We must insist that our federal, State, and local governments STOP the islamization of Our Country. We must insist that they live up to the one legitimate purpose of civil government: to protect our GOD-given rights.
6. WE are a Christian Country based on Judeo – Christian principles. Our Constitution is not a suicide pact. It does not require us to permit Muslims to take Our Country over and destroy Our principles and impose their barbaric totalitarian system on us.
The Declaration of Independence recognizes God as Creator, supreme Judge and Regulator of the World, and as our Divine Protector.
Article VII of Our Constitution, just above the signatures, recognizes the Lordship of Jesus Christ. It says,
Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven …
7. So! Let us summarize the above three Principles:
(1) Our Rights come from God – they predate & preexist the constitution. our constitution doesn’t give “rights” to anybody. so muslims don’t have “constitutional rights” to come here, build mosques, proselytize, and impose shariah.
(2) all the Evidence shows that Muslims take away from People the Rights God gave them. Since Our Declaration of Independence acknowledges that the purpose of civil governments is to secure the Rights GOD gave us, it is the duty and responsibility of civil governments at all levels to protect us from islamization.
(3) Article VI, clause 2, U.S. Constitution – the “Supremacy clause” – makes it unconstitutional for Muslims to practice shariah law ANYWHERE in Our Country.
8. The Center for Security Policy recently issued a scholarly (but readable) report: “Shariah: The Threat to America” . Important suggested policy changes are listed on pages 141-144. Tell your tea party groups! Take delegations to your local, state, and federal representatives and tell them about it. Most of them are weak & ignorant, so you must educate them and demand that they do their job and defend your community from islamization.
9. Dutch Member of Parliament Geert Wilders lists ten steps western countries must take to stop the islamization of their countries. All ten steps are mandated by our Declaration of Independence, and consistent with our Constitution:
(1) Stop cultural relativism: We must formalize the Idea that we have one dominant culture that is based on Judaism & Christianity [Wilders adds “humanism”].
(2) Stop pretending that Islam is a religion.
(3) Show the true face of fundamentalist Islam. It is a brutal totalitarian ideology.
(4) Stop all immigration from Muslim countries. For Muslims who are already citizens, tell them that if they adhere to our values and our Constitution, they may stay as equals. But if they deviate, we will expel them.
(5) Outlaw shariah and deport practitioners.
(6) Require Muslims to sign legally binding pledge of integration and allegiance.
(7) Stop building mosques.
(8) Seek reciprocity with Saudi Arabia for western churches & synagogues.
(9) Close all Islamic schools – they are fascist institutions teaching hate.
(10) Remove our current weak leaders.
It is time to boldly stand up for Our God, OUR Declaration of Independence, and Our Constitution, and say, “No!” to those who are taking over Our Country. It is time to use Our God-given unalienable Rights and Our Constitution as the Sword & Shield they are meant to be. We can and must use these to defeat Islamization. PH
Reference: report originally emanating from Debka stating that the Iranian nuclear computer systems have been hacked into and a virus (worm) inserted.
My response
Iranian computers are PCs operating on Windows 7. The minds behind Stuxnet apparently discovered four new vulnerabilities in the latest Windows operating system previously unknown to Microsoft, two of which have reportedly already been plugged. (Nuclear weapons controlled by Windows? Let’s not even go there.) The actual industrial equipment, however, is controlled by software specially designed for the Iranian by another company — Siemens.
That’s correct, except that Siemens doesn’t write the application software for these things, the system integrator does. My understanding is that it was a Russian system integrator working for the Russian contractor who put this together. Siemens sells these things as appliances, much like Compaq or Dell does with computers. They don’t get into application software.
One other thing. 30,000 PLCs sounds a little fishy. I don’t trust anything coming out of Iran, particularly if it involves numbers. However, if it’s true that large numbers of PLCs were attacked, that suggests to me that each centrifuge has one PLC, and what happened here is that the malware caused them all to overspeed and self-destruct. This suggests that the target was the separation plant(s), and not the breeder.
If they really did this, my hat is off to them. And I don’t even own a hat.
Logicom
The primary sources would of course be the Koran written in Arabic verse, together with the multiple interpretations, commentaries, and analysis of same, comprising many thousands of books, essays etc., etc.
All very doable for a retired unilingual Calgary (1 horse town) attorney with extensive experience in the interpretation of the Canadian civil code- specialty fixing parking tickets
Catarin
Unfortunately you may say that of any religion. There is the dogma and the interpretation of same. Often the problems arise with the interpretation which can any which way.
Mine eyes have seen the Glory of the Coming of the Lord”…but they have also glazed over many times when I read the endless and long list of people’s names who are willing to publicly state that Israel is the most—perhaps the only–evil country on earth. They wish to boycott Israel, its products, its academics, its people. Many are well-known names, distinguished names. They are also all conformists and hypocrites, whose standards for Arab and Muslim countries are so low that they do not expect anything but severe violations of human rights among them.
Mohammed had no clue that after he died the next caliph Abu Bakr would order Muslims to go out and conquer other people in the name of Islam and bend them to their will. It appears there was already “palace intrigue” during Mohammed’s last days when forces represented by Abu Bakr and other Muslim leaders went against Ali, cousin and son-in-law of Mohammed, their Uncle Abbas and the rest of Mohammed’s family as to who would be the next caliph. Mohammed had already appointed Abu Bakr the head of the mosque and perhaps may have wanted Ali, the younger man and his own flesh and blood, to be the next caliph, but he died choosing no successor, perhaps not wanting to hurt either side. Muslim leaders declared Abu Bakr to be the next caliph, angering Ali etal so much that Ali refused to join the new caliphate for six months.
Arabia at the time was having economic difficulties. Its agriculture was failing because irrigation systems had not been maintained, the soil was depleted, and orderly government decreased. The Roman Empire was gone, and Byzantine armies were trying to spread Christianity to surrounding areas. Arab tribes in Syria asked the Arabian Muslims for help in fending off the Byzantine armies. Abu Bakr sent them reinforcements, and the Bedouins, tired of starvation and now used to war, enlisted readily and soon were dying enthusiastically for Islam.
It was also that Arabs were better fighting forces. They were better led and disciplined, could fight on empty stomachs and knew that conquest would be where their next meals would come from. Abu Bakr set down the rules: Be just, be valiant, die rather than yield, be merciful and don’t slay old men, women and children. Destroy no fruit trees, grain or cattle. Keep your word, even to enemies, but compel the rest of mankind to become Muslims or pay us tribute. If they refuse these terms, then kill the !#%&*@! (emphasis mine.)
I’ve read that many Muslims, even today, consider these terms “kind”. But the conquerees were not asked for complete submission to Islam but complete submission to Muslim warriors. Under these terms, America’s Founding Fathers and colonial fighters would all have had their heads chopped off, because there is a part of humanity that will never accept these terms, and many people, including a huge number of Jews, chose death rather than submit to Muslims.
The Muslim conquerors marched on. Damascus was taken in 635 ce, in 636 Antioch, in 638 Jerusalem; in 640 all Syria was conquered, and in 641 Egypt and Persia. Apparently the rules put down by a caliph are good for only his lifetime. The next caliph Omar forbade Muslims to buy or till land in the conquered lands. He wanted Muslim warriors to remain a military caste and supported by the state. He gave the armies 80% of the loot and took 20% for the state. All this went out the door when he died, and Muslim warriors did whatever they chose, including rounding out their harems with Jewish and Christian women. ick.
A big point I want to make is Mohammed had nothing to do with this.
More to come on Ali.
To all who responded:
Most of what I know about Islam and the Quran comes from historian Will Durant’s the _Age of Faith_, published in 1950. He was the last Western scholar to have access to the ancient archives of the Middle East.
It irks me that Muslims with ulterior motives use (or don’t use) the Quran to preach untruths, especially when it results in the wars and troubles we see happening today. Will Durant was complimentary to Mohammed for taking a nearly heat-stroked and starving people and turning them into a nation in his lifetime.
Most of the Quran is based on Judaism and perhaps on ideas that were common among Semite people. He misinterpreted some Christian traditions in the quran, thinking that Miriam Moses’ wife and Miriam the mother of Jesus were one and the same… He threw in a few things that were Zoroastrian. Mohammed’s purpose was to raise and bless the lives of his followers, even if he did have to kill many of them to get them to convert.
The verses in the second half of the Quran are based on poetic words spoken to Mohammed by the angel Gabriel in the mountains outside of Mecca. The verses were written on scraps of whatever material was available and memorized by his followers. (One of his Companions was killed in battle fighting other Arabs, and the verses he memorized are lost to the Quran.) The verses from Medina appear to be written by another hand other than Mohammed’s (The melodic flow is gone,) and are the first verses in the Quran, even though chronologically they should be last. It was his Companion and father-in-law Abu Bakr who ordered, after Mohammed’s death, that an assistant gather the scraps and record the memorized verses for the Quran. My next post will lay out my theory that it was Abu Bakr who was the Big Bad Wolf.
Here are a few highlights regarding women. Mohammed did not disdain commerce. His first wife Khadija owned a trading company, and she went to work every day. Mohammed said a woman might follow any legitimate profession, (Quick! Someone tell the Wahhabis and Taliban!) keep her earnings and dispose of her property as she saw fit. They were permitted to go out at will. Women did not wear veils during Mohammed’s lifetime nor for a hundred years afterward. There were some restrictions for women on mosque attendance, inheritance, divorce, and legalities, but during Mohammed’s time women had it pretty good.
More to come…
The primary sources would of course be the Koran written in Arabic verse, together with the multiple interpretations, commentaries, and analysis of same, comprising many thousands of books, essays etc., etc.
All very doable for a retired unilingual Calgary (1 horse town) attorney with extensive experience in the interpretation of the Canadian civil code- specialty fixing parking tickets.
Catarin is right of course Narvey needs to learn how to research. Try primary sources.
Catarin, it is misleading to pick out Sura 2.256 of the Koran to suggest that it is a stand alone fundamental principle of Islam and suggest that Jihadists and their sympathizers conveniently ignore that principle that there is no compulsion in religion.
There are a great many experts who have explained that a principle of interpretation of the Koran devised by the earliest Islamic scholars and their successors to this day, is abrogation. That means that earlier Koranic principles are abrogated in favor of later prinicples that are in conflict with the earlier principle.
Sura 2.256 was penned by Mohammed in Mecca when he was developing his new religion of Islam. Some of these earlier passages incorporate Jewish and Christian principles. It appears Mohammed borrowed much in that regard.
According to experts, the ealier Koranic principles such as sura 2.256 were benign and peaceful, with a view to induce others, including Jews to accept the new religion of Islam. Being rejected in Mecca, Mohammed moved with his followers to Medina where he sought converts to his new religion which he continued to establish principles.
Jewish Encyclopedia recounts the history of Mohammed’s relations with the Jews of Medina. At first he was friendly expecting they would accept his new religion of Islam. Some of the early peaceful tenets of the Koran were set out both in Mecca and during Mohammed’s early time in Medina when he sought to convert the Jews to Islam. When the Jewish tribes of Medina rejected Islam, Mohammed visciously and lethally turned on them.
It appears according to experts, that it was this point in the history of Islam when Mohammed began to set out the tenets of the Koran that were intolerant of and villified Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims, calling for their deaths, conversion and subjugation to live under Islamic domain as second class dhimmis. Jews and Christians were allowed to retain their own religions under Islamic dominion provided they lived as dhimmis, accepted humiliating restrictions and denials of rights accorded to Muslims and paid the Jizyah tax to the Muslim leaders.
See: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=326&letter=M
There is much written on the subject of the principle of abrogation in the study and interpretation of Islam from both Muslim and non-Muslim experts. Much is available on the internet in that regard.
An example of this is found in an essay by David Bukay, Peace or Jihad? Abrogation in Islam written for the fall 2007 edition of Middle East Quarterly. See:
http://www.meforum.org/1754/peace-or-jihad-abrogation-in-islam
As to what you call the corruption of Islam, you lay on the shoulders of Mohammed’s sucessor, Abu Bakr. That corruption or turning from Islamic principles of peace and tolerance appears to have begun with Mohammed after the Jewish tribes of Medina rejected Islam. It was soon after that, that Mohammed led his followers to conquer and convert others in Medina. With that success, Mohammed returned to Mecca, waged war and defeated the Meccans. From there, Mohammed stormed out of the Arabian peninsula conquering and converting tribe after tribe, nation after nation.
It has been said that religions are defined on the ground or in other words by the words and deeds of the majority of adherents to that relgion. So it is with Islam.
Citing the Jihadists as misguided militant Muslims who do not understand the teachings of Islam, first assumes that such statement is true and secondly you are suggesting that the problems the West faces with Islam are only coming from the militant Jihadists and implying these Jihadists are small in number and do not speak for the vast majority of the Muslim world.
There have been no credible studies done to actually support Western leaders’ declarations that the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful and reject the Islamic principles that Jihadists follow.
The evidence from countless news reports of what is being preached and taught by not just Jihadist terrorists, but by national Muslim political leaders, countless imams in Muslim nations and in the West, many Muslim media organizations outside and within the West, the writings of many Muslim pundits, philosophers, educators and preachings of activist leaders and the like, overwhelmingly leads to one inescapable conclusion.
That conclusion is that those Muslims who ascribe to principles of Islam that the Jihadist cite as their validation for their views and deeds, are hardly confined to militant Muslims or a relatively small minority within the world’s population of 1.6 billion Muslims.
Robert Merry, “Sands of Empire,” must be read by every American. Where Obama says we are fighting terrorism, we are not at war with Islam. Merry has correctly summarized the issue simply as the reverse: The enemy is Islam, not terror. It is the clash of civilizations. West v. Islam.
The only choice we mistakenly feel we have: is this: Dhimmitude, submission, or Freedom. For civilized man there can only be one. The dichotomy presents the alternatives us to understand (1) Islam’s sudden but not unexpected influence in global politics mainly because of oil, (2) why do some feel the need to begin holding interfaith dialogue initiatives as if the religions are somehow equivalent, (3) how are we to confront the widening impact of an alien jurisprudence called Sharia, 4) we are not compelled to burden ourselves with the deterioration and persistence of human rights in Islamic societies , (5) a religious doctrine that compels jihad terrorism, or a “moderate” westernized Muslim is not to be called a Muslim (6) the absurd and hopeless patterns of Western appeasement will only inspire increased conflict and (7) the increasingly volatile relationship between migrant Muslim communities in the West and their host societies is a harbinger of things to come..
Muslim immigration to the West is not a random statistical event The living is easier, freer, better. Muslims have no interest in returning to their country of origin once they taste the banquet of life in the West. It is not expected that reformation of Islam will come soon enough to avoid the inescapable final conflict.
Why does the West allow Islam the arrogance to persist in its meddlesome ways? Islam is only an unnecessary retrogression by a primitive and savage culture that will accomplish nothing but interrupt the material and social progress the West that has conclusively designed a better life for the average man on the planet.
Why do we endure an insult to our intelligence? The answer I fear is the enlightened polity of mankind having come over time to establish open and free democratic societies that by its very inherent legal constructions, it’s culture and acknowledged human values has made itself open to attack. Freedom employed by the enemy is Democracy’s Achilles heel. Democracy compels us to engage in dialogue with Muslims, to hear Islamic doctrine, tenets and practices, including the very alarming and threatening political ideology of Islam, no matter how many deceptions of avowed “peace” they practice as a divinely permitted way of life. In this way, it is hoped by naive and uninformed persons permitted who enjoy the freedom to think freely that exceptionally unpleasant issues like religious terrorism — that is not an oxymoron — can be appropriately targeted and addressed for reformation, if at all. Democratic dialogue, however, is not the rational method that can be adopted for success. It must fail. It is an inherent contradiction impossible to be understood by our avowed enemy for “reasonableness” is not a virtue of their faith. Their God has so ordained. The “clash of civilizations” can only be resolved by the Sword.
The conflict to resolve the two modes of civilizations will result in only one victor. And it ought to be obvious upon reflection which will be victorious. Why do we prolong and bear the unnecessary torment? Because we are a Western Democracy.
A big problem in Islamic society is the fact that Islam has become whatever its adherents say it is. Foul Muslim leaders and clerics tell their followers what they wish them to believe, whether there is any basis in the Quran for it or not. Muslims are encouraged to ask for interpretations of the Quran, not study it themselves, so man are easily misled. Which begs the question, since most Muslims are required to memorize the Quran, what do they think when they come to passages that say Israel is the Land of the Jews? That Muslims should honor the Jews’ covenants with God?
Mohammed intended that Allah should be the very same G-d that Jews and Christians worship. He told Muslims to incorporate the Torah and New Testament into their beliefs. He took seriously that Islam should be a part of the Abrahamic tradition, unlike today when some Muslims claim, then twist it, when it is convenient to them.
The Quran says: Let there be no compulsion in religion. This means that if a Muslim would rather become a Jew or a Christian or a Buddhist, he is free to do so. However, we know the reality is that he is most often murdered. If some Muslims don’t like what their wives and/or daughters did, hey! murder them too. The Quran says a Muslim cannot be accepted in Heaven if he kills innocents. This is totally ignored by Islamic militants.
I have read the Mufti of Damascus follows the true meaning of the Quran, and I believe the Mufti of Cairo does also. What they can do to lead believers back to the true meanings intended by Mohammed, I’m not sure, since Islam is comprised of a lot of little leaders, not one heading up the entire religion.
In my studies of the Quran, it is my opinion that Islam was corrupted from the moment Mohammed died. The culprit was Abu Bakr, a Companion and father of Mohammed’s last wife, who issued the commands to go out and conquer, steal and kill if the people refused to convert. I believe this is what Islam has become to militant Muslims, a license to steal and kill.
I don’t believe any other immigrants have demanded changes to accommodate their religions. But Muslims do, prodded on by various Muslim organizations, like CAIR.
Narvey:
—
Islam is incompatible with Western culture, history, judicial system, and civilization. Remember, our judicial system based on Judea-Christian values. Islam objects these values and Koran calls for extermination of Christians and Jews. Muslims objective is creation of global Caliphate and establishing Shariah Law. All this eventually leads to civil war, unless we will take care and deport all muslims from US and Europe. Look what is going in Britain, France and other countries where muslims clear declared their primary objective to overcome current social systems and replace them with Sharia law. Read below confessions of leading muslims around the world, including American
and watch the Fitna on:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/03/here-is-fitna.html
Why Muslims Come to the West
Dr. Ja`far Sheikh Idris in article “Separation Of Church And State”
http://www.islaam.com/Article.aspx?id=559
said: “Secularism cannot be a solution for countries with a Muslim majority or even a sizeable minority, for it requires people to replace their God-given beliefs with an entirely different set of man-made beliefs. Separation of religion and state is not an option for Muslims because is requires us to abandon Allah’s decree for that of a man.”
Omar Ahmad Co-founder of the Council of American-Islamic Relations: “Those who stay in America should be open to society without melting, keeping Mosques open so anyone can come and learn about Islam. If you choose to live here, you have a responsibility to deliver the message of Islam … Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of
scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”
Fatah, a left-wing Canadian Muslim who wants Canada to ban the hijab and burka, writes about Tariq Ramadan as the new face of Islamists.
“Tariq Ramadan reflects the new sophisticated arm of the worldwide Islamist movement, which sees the West as the right place to wage a cultural and intellectual jihad. It preys on Muslim youth who are tired of the old guard; men in beards and long frocks, frothing as they denounce the evil West. The new technique is to undermine the West from within, like parasites and termites, with the host society never
knowing what hit it, until it is too late. UK is one example.”
Algerian leader Houari Boumédienne said at the United Nations in 1974:
“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”
Al-Jazeera’s Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi, who is widely hailed as a moderate reformer in the West, said:
“Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and victor,” and “the conquest this time will not be by the sword but by preaching and ideology.”
A Saudi Sheikh, Muhammad bin Abd Al-Rahman Al-‘Arifi, imam of the mosque of King Fahd Defense Academy, said:
Muslims “will control the land of the Vatican; we will control Rome and introduce Islam in it”
Mullah Krekar, a jihadist who currently resides in Norway, although officials have been trying for years to get him out of the country, said:
“The number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes”
Plus, remember, all muslims organizations in US have close ties to global terrorist organizations, like Hamas, Hezbullah, Brotherhood. I can send you more information on this issue.
Publius is overly simplistic and selective in citing God given rights, the American constitution and Declaration of independence as America’s sword and shield against the efforts of some American Muslims to transform America into a Sharia compliant and Islamified nation.
I say some American Muslims, because obviously not all American Muslims have such an agenda. One hopes that those that have such an anti-American agenda are in the small minority of American Muslim citizens. There are however, no credible studies done that can put an actual number on those American Muslims who put America first and those who put Islam and an agenda to Islamify America, first.
What Publius has ignored is that the very sources on which he premises his advocated sword and shield against the Islamification of America, are the very same sources that Muslims bent on Islamifying America, premise their right to so advocate and try to advance their agenda.
One of the hallmarks of any democracy is the right of freedom of speech, such that a minority is free to advocate and act on views that oppose and challenge the majority view and which opposing views, seek to transform conventional norms and values to the minority view.
America’s history of tolerating opposing views is variably swaying between more or less tolerant. That is well known as is the fact that in time, minority views sometimes prevail and the roles of the minority and majority are reversed.
In past the evolution of American/Western Judeo-Christian and democratic norms and values has been in response to these various challenges, including challenges from the outside.
This evolution however, has not been transformative. Rather it is more akin to an advancement and sophistication of norms and values, moving within the ambit of and in the same direction as those norms and values as understood when speaking of God given rights, the constitution and Declaration of Independence.
The challenge from those Muslims that seek to make America Sharia compliant and Islamic compatible or Islamified is not just an evolutionary force, but a transformative force. If one takes those Muslim proponents of Islamifying America at their word and one imagines that they ultimately succeed, America would be fundamentally changed, culturally, religiously and politically. Much of what marked America as a Judeo-Christian democratic nation would be gone.
It is this qualitative difference between American history of evolutionary change, prompted by circumstance and minority opinion and dissent contrasted with the current transformative force to substantially change the Judeo-Christian/democratic nature and character of America pushed by some American Muslims, that Americans must open their eyes to.
To advocate however, as Publius does from the standpoint of America’s sword and shield resting in God given rights, the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, is not sufficient. That is especially so, since that argument will be met by those Muslims who seek to transform America by their reliance on the very same sources for their own sword and shield.
America must thus come to see this transformative force as not just another challenge along the continuum of history, but rather a manifest threat to the American way of life, norms, beliefs, rights and values that Americans have come to cherish. Americans cannot afford as they have to bask in the glory of their cherished way of life. They must now pay a price to hold onto that way of life, which means Americans must put themselves on the line and rise up and defend their way of life that they so cherish.
as substantially different then challenges in the past. With that, America must more precisely define that transformative Muslim agenda as an intolerant ideology that goes beyond the line of what intolerance America can afford to tolerate.
Increasing numbers of Americans are opening their eyes to what is at stake when it comes to the transformative force pushed by some Muslims. American leaders, especially however, have been restrained to say the least in terms of leading the nation to push back against this transformative force.
That restraint, while condemned by an increasing number of Americans, is understandable.
The reasons for the West’s restraint in combatting these Islamic transformative forces are familiar to most of us. They have to do with globalization, the power of oil wielded mightily by the Saudi led OPEC nations, American vulnerability to that power and a rational fear factor, based on the knowledge that Jihadism is growing and that many of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims are easily roused to anger with the potential for violence, by the Jihadists amongst them.
The Islamification transformative force has become a serious threat that Americans must begin to not only take seriously, but talk about openly and talk to their leaders. Already, much of the EU has buckled to that force.
In North America, our leaders must lead our nations in drawing the limits of our line of tolerating the intolerable in our society, not in sand but in the hard rock of our land and the psyches of our people and declare unequivocally that the Islamification transformative forces, lie beyond the limiting line of what our nations will hereafter tolerate.
Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, principles of equality and our values, can no longer be mouthed as imprecise platitudes. Each of these cherished rights and freedoms cannot be without limits. It is incumbent upon our leaders to more precisely define them and have the will to act on them.
What is required is a wholesale societal attitude change to ensure each and every Westerner who cherishes our way of life, norms, values, rights and freedoms are prepared to stand up to protect and defend them to ensure our future generations will have all that we so cherish today.
It is our culture and our way of life. We and not the Muslims behind the Islamification transformative forces who have the right to define for ourselves what we want our culture and way of life to be.
This is one of the best articles I have read. It should be printed on the front page of every newspaper. America must know we are in great trouble and must realize this truth. Islam is laughing as they continue to take us down from the inside out as they promised. to have their flag over our White House. they have pulled this on every country in the world and have the same connies who helped Hitler to push it. everyone must also realize that they are in every facet of AMerica from the big house down and one of every three troops have muslim and Iran, Saudi and all Islam is calling for them to kill our troops…and they are..Many of our high Military say they will not side with Obama or any Muslim and then there are some who do..think of the Killing at Fort Hood and what was done and not done and what Generals said sic ! Every governent is to protect our country, but no fence, no millitary and now we have them like cancer all over our country.The is for sure AMerica’s last chance to bring G-d and HIS word back into our lives. LOOK at this generation ! G-d tells us to FOLLOW the laws of our land and HOLD THEM WE VOTE IN ACCOUNTABLE. not to cuddle and help the enemies like some of the churches do. They say love your enemies. well what does that have to do with LAWS that G-d told us to follow? How many muslims, gangs, drugs and terrorist have to come on the border and visa’s before all get it. and have infested our colleges and schools long ago. Remember it was Saudi who rewrote our histroy books and other books and paid for them..They also pay terrorist to kill our troops and so does Iran and Pakistan and all of them. Hearing the muslim in our white house say we are a muslim country sic ! I sit here for ten yrs and wonder how many have to loose it all before they wake up to truth. SIN is a reproach to any nations. the very ones who are Muslims are the ones G-d says are HIS enemies and whoever stands with G-d’s enemies and the enemies of Israel are cursed and cut off forever..Genesis 12:3. no ont can sit on the fence, you are either for the ONLY G-d and obey HIM and believe HIM or you make gov a god. You have to love G-d and your families more than that?..seems like the bigger the lie the more people fall for it. and don’t forget we have traitors on both Rep and Dem and in Independants. dig deep, don’t follow the herds. the old REP are good and the DEMs are bad is crap..lies..birds of a feather flock together ,,ever see crows fly with eagles? Pray wihtout cheasing. stand with Israel, they are painted into the same corner that we are in..STAND UP, fight the good fight for our G-d…TRUST HIM..not men,,men never saved anyone..G-d bless and much Shalom..
ADRESSING ISLAMIC NETWORKS INFILTRATION AND SUBVERSION AND OBAMA ISLAMIC TENDANCIES IS VITAL AND URGENT.ISLAMISTS USE OBAMA AND LEFT TO TAKE CONTROL OF UNITED STATES FROM INSIDE AND USE THE SAME WAYS IN OTHER DEMOCRACIES.DON’T LET THEM WIN OR THAT PLANET IS DONE
Jennifer Hawke-Petit of the New Haven, Connecticut murders demonstrates a hard an bitter truth that Americans must learn.
Do not negotiate with terrorists. Do not surrender to their demands.
Accept loss, do not live in terror of loss.
Sure sometimes you must raise your hands or move aside when they point a gun at you so you might have a chance to attack them later hopefully with a better chance of success but there is a definite boundary in granting terrorist demands.
When the wife was in the bank,she could have had both men arrested and her family saved. There was no reason for her to walk out of that bank without an armed police guard. Once you have achieved safety – keep it and turn on the oppressors.
It’s an object lesson for learning not to be terrorized, in daily life as is political life. Personal life is no different. How you live is how you die, how you die is how you live. Decide in advance, you will not be terrorized. Americans are socialized to be victims, to not resist and surrender to crime, criminals and terrorists.
There is no difference between the personal daily life and the political life. Both must be lived with courage.
Do not listen to what the system owners tell you, they have their own selfish reasons for their own greed, decide for yourself.
Islam is unequivicably morally wrong. It is evil and should be done away with. If these or those people want to practice it without harning anyone, all the power to those morons, much like the bs of aa so be it. However, when those people infringe upon my rights, let them burn in hell. There are slightly only 13-14 nillion of us, but we seem tohold them at bay. I curse the whole israeli parliment for even giving a slightest thought to those vermin.