Peloni: Highly recommended video. I could not be more pleased by the passage of this long overdue legislation which provides for the execution of those convicted of terrorism. Only in Israel do world leaders voice objections to such routine expectations of terrorists facing the death penalty. In fact, the international objections to the execution of terrorists parallels the funding which the international community has provided for the tutelage of these terrorist under the learned auspices of UNRWA. Indeed, the hypocrisy behind hypocritical this outcry would be obnoxious if it were so transparently intent upon preserving the psychopaths who were specifically weaponized to bring about the slaughter and mayhem which has become normative in Israel over the past decades without the polical will in Israel to end such norms. Well, October 7 changed this, and hopefully the passage of this law will be but only the first of many such legislative changes which mark the will to institute realized justice and security in Israel.
Video Loads Below
The totally crooked Left Wing Extremist Israeli Judiciary will overturn this law as soon as a sentence of execution is handed down if not before.
It is unfortunately an empty gesture.
Quite a few confusions. At 84 I remember when Britain on average hanged a murderer every month “to encourage the others” without avail. The average number of homicides per annum has not changed significantly since hanging was stopped. It is well known that if the detection rate for crime is over 50% – higher the better then criminals desist or change sector. Worse: a lot of homicdes are “domestics” in a context of Saturday night drinking and tempers – when thinking is off side.
Hanging rebels did not stop the rebellion of various colonial territories. I saw the gallows in Acre castle /jail and I have seen the Algerian pictures of the execution yard now inscribed with the names of about 200 who were guillotiined – but it did not stop the move to independence.
One of the objections to hanging Moslem nationalist homicides is that they want to go to Paradise and an important part of punishment psychology is to NOT give offenders what they want. Put them in solitary on hard labour. While they are alive their families have to trouble themselves to visit and write/phone.
The Gilad Shalit argument is wet as it was a political mistake to give in on that case in the first place – and there are medieval Jewish cases of hostage taking and refusal by the victim to be ransomed so as to disuade repetition.
The argument of shooting the badly wounded terrorist then treating the less wounded is disgraceful. It is against the Geneva Convention and as the WW II showed if you break that, the enemy do likewise (Germans v. Russians, and Japanese theatres where persuading troops to take prisoners sometimes turned difficult. Most important prisoners are a valuable source of intelligence which is key to all guerilla warfare in a civilian background – and prisoners talk just because it is too easy to shoot them and let it look like a battle case.
Gvir is a loudmouth and crass – celebratory drinking on a Bill of Execution. Arabs are human and it is in Torah NOT to give more than 40 strokes NOT to dehumanise in your/our eyes. That does NOT stop the Arab etc objections of discrimination and inhumanity being public hypocrisy given Sharia dhimmi status for non Moslems and the Arab countries use of death penalties by hangiing and sword.