Why Israel Removed the Metal Detectors

The security services will do anything to prevent another intifada—including prop up Mahmoud Abbas.

By Daniel Pipes, WSJ

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah, July 21. Photo: abbas momani/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah Party announced Saturday that the “campaign for Jerusalem has effectively begun, and will not stop until a Palestinian victory and the release of the holy sites from Israeli occupation.” Fatah demanded the removal of metal detectors and other security devices from the entrance to the Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount. A week earlier two Israeli policemen were killed by terrorists who had stashed their weapons inside the mosque.

The Fatah statement was illogical and hypocritical. Many mosques in Muslim-majority countries use the same security technology to protect worshipers, tourists and police. Yet Mr. Abbas managed to force the Israeli government to remove them. He did it by deflecting attention from the policemen’s murders and stoking fear of a religious conflagration with vast repercussions.

The Temple Mount crisis highlights with exceptional clarity three factors that explain why a steady 80% of Palestinians believe they can eliminate the Jewish state: Islamic doctrine, international succor and Israeli timidity.

Islam carries with it the expectation that any land once under Muslim control is an endowment that must inevitably revert to Muslim rule. The idea has abiding power: think of Osama bin Laden’s dream of resurrecting Andalusia and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s hopes of regaining influence over the Balkans. Palestinians consistently report their belief that the state of Israel will collapse within a few decades.

A confrontation over the Temple Mount uniquely excites this expectation because it reaches far beyond the local population to arouse the passions of many of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims. The most prominent Muslim leaders and institutions overwhelmingly supported Fatah’s position on the Temple Mount security provisions. Islamic voices outside the pro-Palestinian consensus are rare. Palestinians rejoice in their role as the tip of an enormous spear.

Palestinians’ illusions of might enjoy considerable international support. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization routinely passes critical resolutions aimed at Israel. Columbia University houses something called the Center for Palestine Studies. Major corporations such as Google and news organizations like the British Broadcasting Corp. pretend there’s a country called Palestine. Foreign aid has created a Palestinian pseudo-economy that in 2016 enjoyed a phenomenal 4.1% growth rate.

In the Temple Mount crisis, the U.S. government, the Europeans and practically everyone else lined up to support the demand for the elimination of metal detectors, along with high-tech cameras or any other devices to prevent jihadi attacks. The Quartet on the Middle East welcomed “the assurances by the Prime Minister of Israel that the status quo at the holy sites in Jerusalem will be upheld and respected.” With this sort of near-unanimous support, Palestinians easily imagine themselves stronger than the Jewish state.

Israel’s security services timidly avoid taking steps that might upset the Palestinians. This soft approach results not from starry-eyed idealism but from an exceedingly negative view of Palestinians as unreformable troublemakers. Accordingly, the police, intelligence agencies and military agree to just about anything that ensures calm while rejecting any initiative to deprive the Palestinians of funds, punish them more severely or infringe on their many prerogatives.

The Israeli security establishment knows that the Palestinian Authority will continue to incite and sanction murder even as it seeks to delegitimize and isolate the state of Israel. But those security services emphatically prefer to live with such challenges than to punish Mr. Abbas, reduce his standing and risk another intifada. The collapse of the Palestinian Authority and a return to direct Israeli rule is the security services’ nightmare. Mr. Abbas knows this, and this week’s fiasco demonstrates that he’s not afraid to exploit Israeli fears to advance his dream of debasing and eventually eliminating the Jewish state.

Mr. Pipes is president of the Middle East Forum.

July 26, 2017 | 4 Comments » | 976 views

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. the U.S. government .. [supported] the demand for the elimination of metal detectors

    I wasn’t aware of this.

    Could we possibly get the USG to eliminate its installations of metal detectors (manufactured by politically connected, GOP-controlled, high-tech firms) and perv-bureaucrats at US airports?

  2. Columbia University houses something called the Center for Palestine Studies

    Abolish government support for higher education.

    No more research grants (gifts to left-wing profsters), no more government-guaranteed student loans (gifts to right-wing banksters).

    No more direct appropriations for intercollegiate sports (gifts for boosters, coaches, and TV networks).

  3. If the situation is a s the writer says, that Israel will do almost anything to avoid another “intifada” then we’re in DEEEEP TROUBLE.” The erratic success of thr last one was only because Israel placed such restraints on it’s own defence forces that the imperative was to defend the rioters rather than frfrnd the Israeli citizens who were suffering unprovoked murder at their hands.

    So what the Bloody hell was the idea of placing the metal detectots on site in the first place, when we CERTAINLY knew that the squatter Arabs would cut up with their usual capers that would cause instant removal, KNOWING that we would do anything to avoid any trouble.

    All this did was exacerbate the problem, which is the overwheening super-confidence of the Arabim that Israel will drop into their hands like a ripe pear, if they put on enough pressure. That the craven Jews will scuttle away back to the US, Britain and the EU.

    So NOW, having won again, and again, both psychologiccally and physically, the Arabs are even MORE confident than ever.

    If the detectors had never been put in , in thr first place, that pleasure would have been denied. But to install them and then take them down in a rush when the poor Arabs objected, gave them a moral and physical victory, one of many.

    They should have said THE DETECTORS STAY, and RIOTERS will be SHOT with live ammunition, not tear gas.

    As for the supposedly seething Arab world, let it seeth, that’s all they can do as they are too far away to do more than lip service to any intifads or other rubbish. They don’t have the money irinclination anyway, as theyhate and fear the Squatters, the originators of the hijack and world terrorism as it is today.

  4. The metal detectors were a correct step going in.
    Coming out was absolutely wrong. With this latest sign of weakness and Abbas’ insisting now that no-one visit the temple mount until all demands are met. Israel has no choice left except to suffer the consequences, they being, that they bring the Arabs into line or give up the temple mount and Jerusalem (all of it, of course).
    When you say it couldn’t happen, wait for exactly the same pressure to do so (while leaving everything in place to be destroyed by gleeful Palis returning home, just like in Gaza).

Leave a Reply