Dozens of MKs accuse EU of blood libel, hatred after West Bank plan leaked

Coalition and opposition lawmakers say internal European document on Area C with plans to boost Palestinians represents ‘same flames of primitive hatred’

By LAZAR BERMAN, TOI        Today, 9:34 pm  

A Palestinian walks on a newly-made section of a road that was financed by the European Union, on the outskirts of the West Bank village of Taqoa, near Bethlehem, January. 16, 2016. (AP Photo/Nasser Nasser)

A Palestinian walks on a newly-made section of a road that was financed by the European Union, on the outskirts of the West Bank village of Taqoa, near Bethlehem, January. 16, 2016. (AP Photo/Nasser Nasser)

Dozens of right-wing lawmakers from both the presumed incoming coalition and its opponents on Wednesday called a leaked European Union document formulating a new program to protect Palestinian claims in the West Bank an “extremely grave breach” of the EU-Israel relationship.

In a letter to top EU officials, the Knesset members effectively accused the Europeans of antisemitism and of dismissing historical Jewish ties to the West Bank.

“We were apparently mistaken in thinking that racist, religious hatred of Jews and Israel was a thing of the past,” read the missive, signed by 40 MKs. “It saddens us to discover time and time again that under the thin veneer of the EU’s civility and manners and the seeming concern for human rights, the same old blood libels can be found, along with the same flames of primitive hatred that seek this time to persecute – not the individual Jew, but the tiny Jewish state.”

“The document completely ignores our people’s historical affinity to our homeland,” the letter said, highlighting its call to monitor Israeli archaeological activities at Jewish heritage sites. “This singular call has but one goal: to subvert the deep and indestructible bond between the Jewish people and its country and homeland.”

The lawmakers said the gravity of the leaked six-page EU document — titled “European Joint Development Programme for Area C” — could not be overstated.

They added that the paper “leaves no room for doubt as to the one-sidedness and animosity of the EU toward the State of Israel and the Jewish people.”

The letter called on the EU to halt illegal construction in areas under Israeli control, stop activities that damage heritage sites and nature in the West Bank, and desist from funding NGOs that seek to delegitimize Israel.

According to the confidential June 2022 “Discussion Note” — seen by The Times of Israel — the EU expressly aims to “protect the rights” of Palestinians living in Area C.

It proposes a five-pillar approach, including mapping out land in Area C, providing legal aid to Palestinians, and enhancing ties between local authorities in Areas A, B and C, with the ultimate goal of fully integrating the three types of territory under Palestinian Authority control.

Israel’s Channel 13 first broke the story on Monday.

Under the 1993 Oslo Accords, the West Bank was split into three administrative divisions, with Area A controlled by the Palestinian Authority, Area B under split control and Area C — the largest section, constituting about 60 percent of the territory — remaining fully under Israeli control.

Letter from 40 MKs to EU’s top officials accusing them of animus against Jews and Israel in light of leaked program on Area C, December 21, 2022 (screenshot)

Area C, which is the only contiguous section of the West Bank and contains the most fertile land and valuable natural resources, was supposed to be gradually transferred to Palestinian jurisdiction, according to the accords, but that has not happened. The Israeli settlements are located in Area C.

The letter was addressed to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, European Council President Charles Michel and European Parliament President Roberta Metsola.

It was signed by members of the Likud, Shas, United Torah Judaism, Religious Zionism and Otzma Yehudit parties from the Benjamin Netanyahu-led coalition expected to form a government Wednesday night, and by opposition National Unity MKs and outgoing ministers Ze’ev Elkin and Matan Kahana.

Likud MK Amichai Chikli told The Times of Israel that the letter was sent to protest “a document that confirms the grave reality on the ground, massive illegal construction planned and financed by the European Union in Area C, while utterly ignoring Israeli sovereignty in the area, while seriously harming  landscape, nature and heritage assets.”


Likud party member Amichai Chikli arrives for a hearing at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem on the election committee decision to disqualify him from running in the upcoming Knesset election, October 6, 2022. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

In response to Monday’s report, the EU’s delegation in Israel would not confirm its authenticity, saying only that as a rule they do not comment on alleged internal documents.

“The EU’s policies and positions are formed by 27 member states and are conveyed and communicated in a proper way both to partners and to the media,” said the delegation in a statement. “Our policy regarding the West Bank has not changed: The EU is united in its commitment to achieving a two-state solution with the State of Israel living live side by side in peace, security and mutual recognition with an independent, democratic, contiguous, sovereign and viable State of Palestine, with Jerusalem as the future capital of both states.”

Area C is today home to around 400,000 Israelis, with 70% of the land off-limits for Palestinian development.

The Foreign Ministry said that the document expresses positions that it sees as “unacceptable,” which Israel has expressed to the EU in the past on multiple occasions.

It also noted the high-level contacts between the two sides, including the renewal of Association Council meetings in June for the first time in a decade.

ELNET, an organization working to build ties between Israel and Europe, called on the EU to promote solutions by increasing its cooperation with Israel. “No long-term solution can come without a frank and direct conversation between all sides,” a spokesman for the organization told The Times of Israel.

The report was written well before the elections in November that will in all likelihood see Benjamin Netanyahu back in power at the head of a right-wing coalition, and as such is not a response to any anticipated changes in Israeli policy.

Religious Zionism leader MK Bezalel Smotrich standing above the illegal Bedouin encampment of Khan al-Ahmar in the West Bank on March 21, 2021. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

According to the coalition deal reached earlier this month between Netanyahu and Religious Zionism leader Bezalel Smotrich, authority over the Civil Administration — an agency of the Defense Ministry and the IDF that directs civilian life in Area C — will be transferred from the Likud defense minister to a junior minister within the Defense Ministry who will be appointed by the far-right Religious Zionism party, likely Smotrich himself.

Smotrich blasted the reported EU document Monday, saying that “the blatant involvement of the EU in the Palestinian Authority’s efforts to establish facts on the ground and unilaterally establish a de facto Arab terrorist state in the heart of the Land of Israel is unacceptable, contrary to international law, and incompatible with basic rules of diplomacy in relations between countries.”

He also pledged that the incoming government would work to stymie the “hostile activity” of the PA and international actors.

“Europe’s use of labels like support for ‘civil society’ and ‘human rights’ were designed to hide the millions of euros given every year to selected NGOs allies, particularly in Area C, to create facts on the ground,” said Gerald Steinberg, the president of the pro-Israel organization NGO Monitor. “Now that the pretense is out in the open, the potential for a major confrontation between Israel and Europe, including over support for NGOs, is very high.”

December 22, 2022 | 11 Comments »

Leave a Reply

11 Comments / 11 Comments

  1. @Ted Belman

    I think that the language of the accords was made confusing deliberately.

    However, from the initial reading, it looks like the whole of the West Bank should eventually pass under the PA jurisdiction, except for the items to be negotiated (the settlements, Jerusalem, etc. – which should have been made non-negotiable to start with).

    This is why it was so important to keep creating facts on the ground which the Arabs did by expanding their settlements, and the Jews, unfortunately, did by freezing theirs for many years (thus helping the Arab cause – for which they are now stridently blaming the EU) – thanks to their own government and defense establishment.

  2. @Reader
    I haven’t sufficiently dealt with this;

    “”?Area C? means areas of the West Bank outside Areas A and B, which, except for the issues that will be negotiated in the permanent status negotiations, will be gradually transferred to Palestinian jurisdiction in accordance with this Agreement.”[11]

    The issues that will be negotiated, according to Article XVII.1, are:

    “Jerusalem, settlements, specified military locations, Palestinian refugees, borders, foreign relations and Israelis; and … powers and responsibilities not transferred to the Council.”

    Area C, controlled by Israel under Oslo Accords, in blue and red, in December 2011

    By excluding Jerusalem and the settlements from the areas to be transferred to the Palestinians, Israeli presence, including the military to protect them, would not change without a negotiated agreement. The Accords also preserve Israel’s exclusive control of the borders, the airspace and the territorial Gaza waters. Oslo II, Article XII:”.

    Thus there is a limit to how much the military is to be withdrawn. Israel can rightly refuse to withdraw the military from all of Area C arguing the military is needed to protect the settlements. I would also point out that the current government has agreed to recognize additional settlements thus making the military protection all the more important.. The Accords did not require a freeze of settlement construction.

    I have never read of a Palestinian demand that Israel withdraw its military from Area C. To my mind, that supports my thesis.

    In addition, the military has many times entered Area A to apprehend terrorists. No one could argue that such incursion wasn’t necessary or illegal.

    Having said all that, I must admit that the Accords are not explicit enough. In fact they are confusing except for the bottom line which I have stressed.

  3. @Reader
    Thanks for your opposition to what I said. But I think Wikipedia and you got it wrong.
    In the preamble to the Interim Agreement it says;

    “Recognizing that the aim of the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations within the current Middle East peace process is, among other things, to establish a Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority, i.e. the elected Council (hereinafter “the Council” or “the Palestinian Council”), and the elected Ra’ees of the Executive Authority, for the Palestinian people in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, for a transitional period not exceeding five years from the date of signing the Agreement on the Gaza Strip and the Jericho Area (hereinafter “the Gaza-Jericho Agreement”) on May 4, 1994, leading to a permanent settlement based on Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338;

    Reaffirming their understanding that the interim self-government arrangements contained in this Agreement are an integral part of the whole peace process, that the negotiations on the permanent status, that will start as soon as possible but not later than May 4, 1996, will lead to the implementation of Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, and that the Interim Agreement shall settle all the issues of the interim period and that no such issues will be deferred to the agenda of the permanent status negotiations;”

    What I believe is wrong is that the article says “Area C….was supposed to be gradually transferred to Palestinian jurisdiction”. The accords say that “A core issue of the Oslo Accords was the withdrawal of the Israeli military from Palestinian territories.” No where in the Accords does it say that all of Area C was to be gradually transferred. In fact the obligation to withdraw from C is limited by the terms of Oslo.

    The “Palestinian territories” are not synonymous with the “West Bank.” I think the “Palestinian territories are A, B and Gaza.” The withdrawal of the military was only intended to enable Palestinian rights in A and B as defined by the Accords. Remember that “negotiations for final status ” were to be based on Res 224 and Res 338. The key thing to be negotiated were the “recognized boundaries” and the nature of the Palestinian autonomy, inter alia.

    No where did the Accords say what the boundaries would be nor what was to be the disposition of Area C. That’s to be negotiated..

  4. Israel did agree to eventually withdraw its military from the “Palestinian” areas of the West Bank:

    A core issue of the Oslo Accords was the withdrawal of the Israeli military from Palestinian territories. The plan was a withdrawal in phases and a simultaneous transfer of responsibilities to the Palestinian authorities for maintaining security. Oslo II, Article X.2 reads:

    “Further redeployments of Israeli military forces to specified military locations will commence after the inauguration of the Council and will be gradually implemented commensurate with the assumption of responsibility for public order and internal security by the Palestinian Police …”

    And Article XI.2.e:

    “During the further redeployment phases to be completed within 18 months from the date of the inauguration of the Council, powers and responsibilities relating to territory will be transferred gradually to Palestinian jurisdiction that will cover West Bank and Gaza Strip territory, except for the issues that will be negotiated in the permanent status negotiations.”[11]

    The first phase included the withdrawal from the Areas A and B. Redeployments from Area C would follow in subsequent phases. Article XI.3 states:

    “?Area C? means areas of the West Bank outside Areas A and B, which, except for the issues that will be negotiated in the permanent status negotiations, will be gradually transferred to Palestinian jurisdiction in accordance with this Agreement.”[11]

    The issues that will be negotiated, according to Article XVII.1, are:

    “Jerusalem, settlements, specified military locations, Palestinian refugees, borders, foreign relations and Israelis; and … powers and responsibilities not transferred to the Council.”
    Area C, controlled by Israel under Oslo Accords, in blue and red, in December 2011

    By excluding Jerusalem and the settlements from the areas to be transferred to the Palestinians, Israeli presence, including the military to protect them, would not change without a negotiated agreement. The Accords also preserve Israel’s exclusive control of the borders, the airspace and the territorial Gaza waters.

    Basically,
    Israel promised to withdraw from the West Bank except from the areas subject to negotiations, and if it is negotiable, then it is, well, negotiable – it means Israel isn't firm on keeping it.

  5. @Zachary Apparently, according to this. Outrageous. At a minimimum, legally the whole thing should be declared Null and void because The PA has not honored any of its committments and the time windows specified lapsed 30 years ago, aside from the fact that Abbas declared the agreements null and void (I’ve always wondered if thats redundant) The only issue, other than Are C, in practical terms, is how to police areas A, B, and Gaza without tying down the entire IDF.

    https://israelipalestinian.procon.org/background-resources/1995-oslo-interim-agreement/

  6. The old European antisemitism is being vastly boosted by the enormous influx of Muslims into the EU, and European countries are frightened of what the Muslims might do if the EU openly supported Israel. Their fears may be justified, but that is not Israel’s problem. Now is the time for Israel to establish firm sovereignty over Judea and Samaria and to tell the EU what it can do with its secret documents.

  7. “Area C, which is the only contiguous section of the West Bank and contains the most fertile land and valuable natural resources, was supposed to be gradually transferred to Palestinian jurisdiction, according to the accords, but that has not happened. The Israeli settlements are located in Area C.”

    I didn’t know that Area C was supposed to be gradually transferred to Palestinian jurisdiction.