Dr Zev Zelenko: “What Hitler started the Israeli government is finishing”

February 12, 2022 | 7 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

7 Comments / 7 Comments

  1. These embalmers that have spoken to Steve Kirsch over the past couple of days have had significant testimonials about the bodies they have been preparing for burial. They are describing massive clots that are abnormally fibrous, not appearing to be anything like normal blood clots and which are obstructing their ability to remove the blood from the bodies due to the complete occlusions of blood vessels by these “clots”. One embalmer describes these clots being present in about 2/3 of cases of all ages since Jan 2021, while the other states that she found these clots with increase occurrence for at least the past 8 months and now has recently been finding them in 93% of cases. Here are their interviews:



  2. Pfizer Trial Whistleblower Presses Forward With Lawsuit Without US Government’s Help

    A former clinical trial overseer for a contractor holding trials of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is pressing forward with a lawsuit against Pfizer and her former company despite the U.S. government declining to side with her.

    Brook Jackson was fired by the contractor, Ventavia Research Group, in 2020. She came forward as a whistleblower in 2021.

    Jackson filed a False Claims Act suit against Pfizer, Ventavia, and another company involved in the trial, ICON. It has been under seal for over a year, but is now public after the U.S. Department of Justice declined to intervene on behalf of Jackson.

    Government lawyers did not explain the choice not to intervene and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which investigates alleged clinical trial fraud, did not respond to a request for comment.

    The choice, though, has not deterred the whistleblower.

    “We’re going to pursue the case without the help of the government,” Jackson told The Epoch Times.

    She said she wasn’t surprised but felt “total disappointment” when, after over a year of putting off a decision, the government declined to intervene.

    The odds of success aren’t good but “it’s just a chance I have to take,” Jackson said. “I just feel like somebody has to be held accountable.”

    Jackson set off a firestorm when the British Medical Journal in November 2021 published a piece, based on documents, recordings, and other materials from Jackson, that outlined repeated failures by Ventavia to properly run sites for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trial before it received emergency clearance from U.S. drug regulators.

    While the article did not include any of the materials, many were filed with the court and obtained by The Epoch Times, including emails that detail problems observed not just by Jackson, but other Ventavia workers.

    For instance, Lovica Downs wrote on Sept. 18, 2020, to Jackson and another employee that she observed boxes containing patient information left on the counter “full[y] exposed to anyone that entered the room could see.”

    Other missives described other problems. Marnie Fisher, Ventavia’s director of operations at the time, said on Sept. 21, 2020, that an investigation found multiple sites had left documents exposed, including a schedule with patient names on it; adverse events either “not being reported correctly or at all”; the vaccine and placebo “not being kept locked” in “disorganized” rooms; and informed consent errors.

    The documents show that Ventavia employees were aware of serious problems arising during the trial, including vaccine administrators who who were either described as having “no training” and “very little oversight” or lacking medical certifications or background. A Pfizer official was copied on, and answered some, of the emails.

    The full sets of documents are embedded; the article continues below them.

    Downs declined to comment while Fisher couldn’t be reached. ICON and Pfizer didn’t respond to requests for comment. Ventavia spokeswoman Lauren Foreman told The Epoch Times via email last year that Jackson worked for Ventavia but “no part of her job responsibilities concerned the clinical trials at issue.”

    In an updated statement on Feb. 11, Foreman added, “Although Jackson was hired to oversee certain sites and aspects of clinical trials, she was only employed with Ventavia for 18 days, and, as a result, did not have the longevity with the company to complete the training for the role for which she was hired.”

    Jackson, through her lawyer, recently threatened to file a defamation lawsuit against Ventavia over its description of her employment.

    The FDA told The Epoch Times in an email last year, “Although the agency cannot comment further at this time in this ongoing matter, FDA has full confidence in the data that were used to support the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine authorization and the Comirnaty approval.” Spokespersons didn’t reply when asked on Monday for an update.

    Jackson was fired hours after filing a complaint with the FDA. A Pfizer official within weeks reached out directly to Jackson for more information, according to text messages reviewed by The Epoch Times.

    The suit was brought under the False Claims Act, which enables Americans to file suits on behalf of the government “against those who have defrauded the government,” according to the government. More than $5.6 billion has been obtained through suits under the act, as of the fall of 2021.

    The suit says Pfizer, ICON, and Ventavia “deliberately withheld crucial information from the United States that calls the safety and efficacy of their vaccine into question.”

    “Namely, Defendants concealed violations of both their clinical trial protocol and federal regulations, including falsification of clinical trial documents,” it also says. “Due to Defendants’ scheme, millions of Americans have received a misbranded vaccination which is potentially not as effective as represented.”

    Jackson is asking the court to award her damages and back pay and reinstate her to her position with Ventavia.

  3. @Edgar
    As I understand it, “in moderation” means that some automated guideline such as comment length or number of hyperlinks have been exceeded and the comment needs to be authorized for others to be able to see it. It’s not foolproof, as you can see the post below is not very long and only has 2 hyperlinks and it was placed in moderation. It has been my experience that after I edit a comment it has a greater chance of being deleted or placed in moderation after the 5min countdown is completed and, likely, this is why this comment below was placed in moderation. You just need to alert Ted to authorize it. Computers seem to have a mind of their own and seem to have the ability to choose when they will exercise their tendencies to exhibit their system hiccups even as they have system protocols that should always work.

  4. @PELONI-

    I wonder what “in Moderation” really means. Does it automatically trash the comment, or does the computer just go over it to seek something???

    Years ago I joined Israpundit with a different user name. 2-3 of my comments in succession went into “moderation” (it may have ben called something else then) and never did re-appear. I was highly offended, took it personally, and left for a number of years. I had never had any comment on any site “edited or examined” before, and didn’t understand why.

    I still really don’t know.

  5. New fertility concerns showing a marked increase in abortions associated with vaxed over unvaxed out of Israel :
    The cause is unknown and will remain unknown if not pursued. It does provide a clear safety signal associated with the vaccines that needs to be explored and explained.

    Also there are other issues as well with new borns and breast feeding that have been raised:
    All of these details should have been known long before any pregnant woman or nursing mother was allowed to receive this experimental vaccine. Such things usually take 5-10 yrs after the vaccine is approved.

    The fact that there seems to be a lack of any concern by anyone in the medical establishment should be provide a significant concern to everyone who is not in the medical establishment.

  6. New video with Dr. David Martin – the patent expert. He is continuing to pursue the Trudeau connection with the patents and how it relates to the current situation in Canada.
    Here is the link:
    Provided summary:

    Breaking: Criminal Canadian Monopoly Dr. David Martin Exposes Why Trudeau Won’t Back Down
    Stew Peters Show
    Published February 11, 2022 135,406 Views
    21:23 / 22:21
    1659 rumbles

    Rumble — In an emergency broadcast, Dr. David Martin joined the Stew Peters Show on Friday to expose the real reason why Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is refusing to negotiate with his constituents on the Canadian bioweapon mandates.
    Stew Peters stated that in April of 2020, Martin highlighted a quote from Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, where he stated “Normality as it was before will not come back full-on until we get a vaccine for this.”
    With no evidence that a vaccine has ever been successful since Pfizer’s first Coronavirus spike protein vaccine patented in 1990, this statement was unfounded. What Trudeau didn’t tell his Canadian constituents or the world was that Canada controlled the mRNA vaccine platform and was destined to become enriched by both Moderna and Pfizer’s partnership with BioNTech.
    Trudeau knew that the gene therapy being promoted as a “vaccine” was an economic win for Canada and therefore Trudeau’s Canada had the monopoly on the world’s adoption of mRNA gene therapy shots. He wasn’t promoting science, he was promoting the Canadian economic interest in the gene therapy illegally promoted as a vaccine.
    “Canada has a bad history of this,” Dr. David Martin told Stew Peters. “We’ve had our Kent States, and we’ve had our situations when the legal and then military actions taken against citizens end very badly.”
    “These people wrote this because they knew tyrants would be here one day, and look, here they are,” Stew Peters told Dr. Martin, regarding the clear instruction given by the U.S. Constitution as to how Americans are to deal with a runaway tyrannical government.