T. Belman. This is the best exposition of the legislature option. Dershowitz showed his true Democratic colours. I could not agree with his opinion because I think that he sets the bar too high for action by the legislature. Nevertheless there is a path to victory.
Subscribe to Israpundit Daily
Digest
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
@ Edgar G.:
My post above has nothing to do with the Dershowitz article. I merely chose the article because it was dealing with the election and it had only a single post that may have felt lonely.
This about the case Trump is fuming about, being regarded as having no standing etc. the refusal of the Penn Supreme Court to hear the case, giving as their reason, that they were too lax in filing. It was re law #77 which had been passed in 2019, and they began litigation only after the election. This is amply shown to be wrong. There was and is litigation ongoing from Sept 2020, as well as a slew of other filings earlier and later. The R&R Law Group lead lawyer who gives a daily 90 min rundown on the legal aspects of what’s going on, and explaining in simple language the details, said that the Penn Supreme Court was wrong, that they had allowed a change in that law shortly before the election to give an extra 3 days for ballots to arrive and other non-legal actions, against the Penn State Constitution, so it was no longer the same law, and also their refusal would easily be overturned in the US Supreme Ct..
He said The Penn decision was dicey,, that it could be described as a decision made and then looking for a cause to reject.
This is from the Epoch Times via ZeroHedge, November 30. Perhaps a ray of hope in the darkness that has fallen over my country:
” Judge Schedules Hearing In High-Profile Georgia Election Case
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours)
The judge who Sunday ordered Georgia officials not to wipe or reset voting machines scheduled the next hearing in the case for Friday.
U.S. District Judge Timothy Batten Sr., a George W. Bush appointee, issued three emergency orders on Sunday, initially ordering officials to hold off on taking action regarding the machines, reversing himself, then re-establishing the first order.
In a Nov. 30 order, Batten said his final decision on Sunday partially granting the defendants’ motion “involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.”
The order enables defendants to appeal the temporary ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Defendants were ordered to file their brief by Dec. 2 while any reply brief will be due Dec. 3.
In a third filing, defendants said Charlene McGowan, Georgia’s assistant attorney general, will be appearing on behalf of the defendants, which include Gov. Brian Kemp, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and state Election Board members.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger speaks during a news conference in Atlanta, Ga., on Nov. 13, 2020. (Brynn Anderson/AP Photo)
McGowan didn’t respond to a request for comment.
The plaintiffs are represented by attorney Sidney Powell. They successfully convinced Batten on Sunday to bar officials in three counties from wiping or resetting Dominion Voting Systems machines.
Plaintiffs are seeking to have outside experts perform forensic inspections of the voting machines.
The judge ruled that defendants are “enjoined and restrained from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any Dominion voting machine in Cobb, Gwinnett, and Cherokee counties.”
He also ordered the board to “promptly produce to plaintiffs a copy of the contract between the state and Dominion.”
Dominion says on its website that “no credible reports or evidence of any software issues exist,” including in Georgia.
Powell wrote on Twitter late Sunday that “Georgia election fraud is being exposed.” ”
‘