Arad: Netanyahu ready to accept ’67 lines with swaps – SHOCKING
A few months ago I wrote The US should cut a deal with Israel and end the conflict and I wasn’t joking but knew it wouldn’t be.
What the US should be doing instead of forcing Israel to meet the PA terms, is to reach an agreement with Israel on refugees, borders, security and Jerusalem. Then the US would recognize such borders and get the EU to do likewise and Israel would withdraw to such borders. Thus the occupation would be ended and there would be no conflict between them and Israel.
But Arad’s deal is way off the mark. Ted Belman
Arad: In lieu of accord with the Palestinians, Israel should negotiate with the Quartet
-
Arad described Netanyahu’s acceptance of the formula of land exchanges and borders based on the pre-1967 lines – even if Israel would add reservations to the notion – as a “major qualitative and quantitative change” in the prime minister’s position.
In exchange for “unilateral redeployment” in W. Bank, Israel could demand from Quartet a quid pro quo that should include no boycotts, other incentives.
If the Palestinians are unable or unwilling to take the steps needed to conclude an accord with Jerusalem, Israel should try to negotiate an interim agreement with the Quartet, former National Security Council head Uzi Arad said on Tuesday.
Read more…









