A Harris victory means a fourth Obama term
Peloni: Obama’s policy was predicated on the notion that the US had more to gain from its enemies than it did from its ally in Israel. Notably, this policy was unsupportable, inexplicable, and simply inaccurate. It was also the only aspect of Obama’s foreign policy where perceived enemies were valued as greater than allies. This is why tensions with both Russia and China have exacerbated in the same period in which tensions with Iran were moderated. While there existed opportunities of negotiation with other adversaries, there has never been any such opportunity with Iran, whose entire regime is predicated upon the subjugation of the West and the annihilation of Israel and world Jewry.
Remembering what that means: Obama refused to recognize that Israel’s leaders might have a better grasp of the situation than he did. He also thought it wrong that they would prioritize their nation’s security. Op-ed.
Obama and BidenOfficial White House Photo by Pete Souza.
“A Harris Victory Means a Fourth Obama Term,” proclaimed an editorial in The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), and “her foreign policy aides are on board for appeasing Iran and putting restraints on Israel.”
This is far from surprising, yet is instructive to examine how Obama viewed the Middle East and Iran.










