Peloni: Science, good science, requires a concerted effort to design studies to specifically remove factors such as selection bias, and yet, what we have seen over the past several years, particularly in what has been passed as ‘research’ on Covid and the ‘safe and effective’ vaccines, is an almost routine use of such mismanaged study designs whose results are dependent upon those factors not being considered and not being removed. Bad science is in fact not science at all. It is propaganda, commonly used to mask its support for special interests as was true going back to the Bernay survey which came to recommend the import of eating bacon for breakfast to improve the sales of the pork industry over a century ago. As the Covid scam becomes more and more revealed and its foundational scientific research is demonstrably seen to be not just flawed but rigged towards an ultimate outcome, demand an accountability for all who were involved in this skullduggery, and a return to investigating the wonders of the universe asnd not the profit margins of such industries as are supported by selection bias passed off as scientific research.
Jeffrey A. Tucker | July 3, 2024
These last years have provided a tremendous education in the ways seemingly rigorous science can actually be highly misleading. Much of the problem traces to a simple idea: selection bias. Once you understand it, much of what we think we know about what is true, along with many studies showing it to be true, melt away.
Good science corrects for the problem but it is still ubiquitous.
Let’s take a simple example.
Say you have a dog and you make his own meals. You are careful about this and rather strict, making sure that you have all the right vitamins and minerals in the meals and each is the right size and you stick with it daily. You monitor the results. You save money. The dog is healthy and happy.
Read more…
