Sharia’s Quiet Conquest of America: The Islamization of the NYPD and U.S. Military (Video)

Peloni:  As explained below, Sharia is not compatible with the American Constitutional system because it is designed to conquer the American Constitutional system.

Kelleigh Nelson:  Americans aren’t looking at Europe. You cannot accommodate these people.

The NYPD and U.S. military once defended America’s Constitution — now they’re bending it to accommodate Sharia.

RAIR Foundation USA | Nov 02, 2025

Standing proudly before the American and Pakistani flags, a soon-to-be NYPD officer — the first Pakistani-American woman to serve in both the U.S. Air Force and the New York Police Department — celebrated that both institutions had “accommodated” her Islamic “religious” demands.

She described, with pride, how she was never required to remove her hijab, not even during gas-mask training in the military. How she was granted a full religious waiver from uniform regulations. How both institutions modified physical-training requirements, allowing her to wear long sleeves instead of the standard PT shirts. And how both the NYPD and the military provided halal food—Sharia-compliant meals—at taxpayer expense.

Her video wasn’t about serving America — it was about how America would bend its traditions and regulations to serve her and her Islamic demands — a declaration that the nation’s most powerful uniforms now yield to the dictates of Islamic law.

[See Video at Link]

From Combat to Compliance

Once, the U.S. military and police stood for uniformity, discipline, and secular law. Now, they’re laboratories for religious privilege and identity politics.

Every “accommodation” — a hijab exemption here, a halal kitchen there — chips away at the neutral foundation of American institutions. The military’s first duty is to national unity, not religious exception. Yet it has become one of the biggest promoters of “diversity” over discipline, granting Sharia waivers while penalizing soldiers who express Christian faith.

How can a nation defend itself from Islamic extremism abroad while it is institutionally codifying Sharia at home?

Sharia by Stealth

When an Air Force recruit can proudly say, “They fully accommodated me. They never asked me to take off my hijab,” she’s not just describing inclusion, she’s describing precedent.

One that future Muslim recruits will now invoke, not as a privilege, but as a right.

That precedent doesn’t stop at clothing. It extends to:

• Halal-only food supply chains — federally funded, Sharia-certified, and enforced on military bases.
• Prayer breaks during duty hours, even in combat environments.
• Gender segregation and modesty accommodations during physical training.

Each of these “exceptions” redefines the mission — transforming the U.S. military from a force of national defense into an experiment in religious appeasement.

The Double Standard

For too long, we’ve watched this double standard play out across America: a Christian soldier quoting Scripture on base is disciplined — but a Muslim soldier demanding Sharia accommodation, a system fundamentally at odds with the U.S. Constitution, is celebrated.

That’s not diversity — that’s displacement. The American creed of “one nation under God” has been replaced by a bureaucratic creed of “all gods under government approval,” with Islam always first in line.

Sharia vs. the Constitution

The very system being “accommodated” within America’s armed forces and police is one that directly contradicts the Constitution they swore to defend.

Islamic law is not merely a private faith system but a total legal code, governing religion, politics, economics, and personal conduct—with principles that openly defy, and are in direct contradiction to U.S. constitutional protections.

Sharia—Islamic law—is not a loose set of moral beliefs but a binding legal system derived from the Qur’an, the Hadith (sayings and actions of Muhammad), and centuries of juristic interpretation compiled in classical manuals such as Reliance of the Traveller. It governs every aspect of life, criminal justice, speech, dress, worship, family law, and even warfare, and demands supremacy over all other legal systems.

Under Sharia (Islamic law):

• Apostasy is punishable by death — violating freedom of religion.
• Blasphemy is punishable by death — violating freedom of speech.
• Women and non-Muslims are legally inferior — violating equal protection under the law.
• Sharia claims supremacy over all man-made laws — violating the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

The First and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee religious liberty within the limits of constitutional order — not above it. Yet today, U.S. agencies are bending those limits to elevate Sharia above secular law, funding and enforcing practices that are explicitly anti-constitutional in nature.

This is not about religious expression — it is about importing a foreign system of governance that denies the very freedoms the Constitution exists to protect.

In short, what is being “accommodated” in uniformed American institutions is not a religion in the constitutional sense, but an all-encompassing foreign legal order that views the Constitution itself as subordinate.

Continue Reading Article