Peloni: Is Trump’s real motivation in Iran really about seizing the Strait of Hormuz with the ultimate goal of forming a global technocracy rather than stopping Iran from becoming a nuclear power?
Patrick Woods | Technocracy News & Trends | Aug 17, 2026
Map of Strait of Hormuz. Image by Pascal – This image is a derivative work of [1]Lib.utexas from [2] Lib.utexas, which was created by the w:Central Intelligence Agency in 1980 and hence is PD-US-Gov, Public Domain, Wikipedia
On August 14, 2026, President Donald Trump stood in front of a law-enforcement crowd at the David S. Mack Center for Training and Intelligence in Garden City, Long Island. Trump told them that after “defeating Iran” he would declare the Strait of Hormuz a territory of the United States. Wait for it… The Strait of America?
NOTUS (News of the United States) recorded Trump’s words:
“After we finish defeating Iran, I will be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States.”
Al Jazeera and USA Today carried more of the same speech. He said “pretty soon” he would declare it, then he pointed to the naval blockade: “Essentially, that’s what it is. We have the blockade. No ships get through unless we want them to.”
Let me be clear. This is not a stunt. It is the next move on IMEC.
On March 18, 2026, I published a white paper here, “IMEC: Trump’s War With Iran Is About Global Trade.” I wrote it to lay bare the myths surrounding the war in Iran and to expose the master plan to restructure global trade routes in order to dominate world trade. This is a tectonic shift in the geopolitical structure of the world. Further, this is the master plan for global Technocracy, even down to making Gaza into the poster child for the technocratic state. If you cannot connect the dots here, then you will be left in the fog.
On April 23 I stated the formula in public:
I posit that the war against Iran had nothing to do with nuclear material, but rather it was about gaining control of the Strait of Hormuz. That said, remember that the media is always reflective, not causative; whatever narrative it carries is never original. The Strait of Hormuz is the what. IMEC is the why. The nuclear program was the excuse.
The territory talk is the same argument, just one step later.


Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.