Peloni: As you read thru the reports revealing the horrors which were unleashed on the children of England with the complicity of the British authorities over the decades, it is an inescapable to conclude the complete state of collapse in which the British stand today. The evil which came to be empowered by the British authorities came at the cost of literal child sacrifices being conducted in a variety of manners. Those responsible for and associated with these crimes should face the death penalty.
By
The extent of the gross atrocities that Muslim rape gangs committed against non-Muslim British girls are now exposed in MP Rupert Lowe’s 219-page Rape Gang Inquiry report. One truth-teller in particular who paid a dear price for trying to expose what was going on for an extended period was Tommy Robinson. Britain’s authorities savaged him as he relentlessly fought in defense of the voiceless girls and women who faced unimaginable cruelty.
MP Rupert Lowe’s 219-page Rape Gang Inquiry report can be found HERE.
The report is so wrenching that a commentary in Daily Caller called for the return of the guillotine for heads of state — such as Keir Starmer — who have proven to be the worst betrayers of their own countries. Starmer was accused of letting suspected Muslim rape gang offenders off with a warning note while he was overseeing Britain’s prosecution service. This statement sums up the evils Muslim rape gangs inflicted upon their victims: “You could bundle up Nanking, the Catholic Church, and Jeffrey Epstein and it wouldn’t come close to touching both the body count and the institutional culpability.”
“Bombshell UK Report Exposes Sinister Sexual Abuse and Torture of 250,000 Girls by Mostly Muslim Men,” by Julia Cassidy, Townhall, June 17, 2026:
A 215-page report released to the public last night details a nightmare that occurred on a colossal scale under the noses of every U.K. official. The “Rape Gang Inquiry,” released by Reform U.K. Parliament member Rupert Lowe, reported that 250,000 white British girls across 149 districts in the U.K. (nearly 40 percent of all U.K. districts) were subjected to “repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.” The report estimates that 87-95 percent of the perpetrators are predominantly Pakistani Muslims, though smaller groups of Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, and other Muslim origins were also involved. According to the report, the “vast majority” of men were not prosecuted for their crimes…..
So keeping in mind that the other groups included in the perpetrator list beyond the 87-95% Pakistanis are also of Muslim origin, so the perpetrators were overwhelmingly Muslim. They had help from non-Muslims: officers drove police cars to help traffic non-Muslim girls to Muslim rape gangs. And a Muslim rapist who forcibly married his 15-year-old victim in a Sharia ceremony was jailed (along with seven other rape gang members), but it was uncovered that the teen’s social worker attended the Islamic wedding ceremony, in which the minor get married against her will.
What Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry report shows is how far leftists will go to cover up Muslim crimes and plaster the label of “Islamophobe” on anyone who tells the truth to protect innocent people; and they do it without accountability.
A report from the publication Christian Concern highlights the Islamic factor:
…testimony from victims such as Taylor who said:
“Before they raped me, they would chant ‘Bismillah Hir Rahman Nir Rahim.’”
(Translation: In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious and the Most Merciful.)Another victim, Eleanor, said:
“I had friends that were Muslim, girl friends, and this never happened to them. They would be in the cars with us sometimes, but the men would treat them differently.”
Jen, another victim, explained:
“They have no compassion for the young girls that are out on the streets and they see us as slags, as white trash. ‘English pig dogs’ came up a lot. Muslims don’t like pigs and they don’t like dogs. So they hate dogs, they hate pigs, and they’d put women on the same level as that.”
Yet another victim, Kate, said:
“Comments were constantly made suggesting that ‘white girls’ and Christian girls were viewed as having fewer morals or lower value, whereas ‘Muslim girls’ were described by some of the men as having dignity and higher moral standing. These comparisons were used to justify the way I was treated and to further humiliate and control me. I was also subjected to religiously charged comments designed to shame and dehumanise me, including statements implying that God had abandoned me or would reject me because of what had been done to me.”
Politicians and their cronies sacrificed hundreds of thousands of innocent girls to avoid the “Islamophobe” smear, and perhaps more importantly, politicians did not want to be held accountable for their suicidal immigration policies.
Also to be kept in mind: religious minorities in Muslim countries have faced and continue to face (if you can possibly imagine) even worse treatment than British girls have endured. These minorities have suffered at the hands of the Islamic State, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hamas (a Muslim Brotherhood offshoot), Boko Haram, al-Shabaab and the like. These persecuted minorities were and are subjected to the same sexual abuse as well as to murder.
Yet anyone who calls out these atrocities that are done in the name of Islam and in accord with its teachings is dubbed “Islamophobic,” or met with the condescending observation that not all Muslims are like that. Obviously they aren’t. Yet those Muslims who are not like that need to join infidels in calling out not just the actions of their coreligionists, but their own religious texts which sanction unspeakable abuses, beginning with Muhammad, who married Aisha when she was six years old and raped her (“consummated the marriage”) when she was nine. If it ever faced this, the West could better understand what has driven 1400 years of Islamic conquest and abuse. Once that is understood, the West could be on a road to greater vigilance, which would include understanding and countering subversion. This subversion is precisely what enables the “Islamophobia” subterfuge, and why Islamic abuses such as the Muslim rape gangs continued.
According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O prophet, indeed, we have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers are successful indeed, who are humble in their prayers, and who shun vain conversation, and who give alms, and who guard their private parts, except from their wives or those that their right hands possess, for then they are not blameworthy.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The biggest question is: what happens now? Are Western authorities in both the private and public sectors going to continue playing the “Islamophobia” card and persecuting those who tell the truth, rather than investigate and prosecute the real perpetrators, those who enabled them, and those who incite abuse and violence? Of course they are. It’s a business for many, a tally of Muslim votes.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.