T. Belman. The Amer Academy of Pediatrics just reported in Children and COVID-19: State-Level Data Report that: Among states reporting, children were 0.00%-0.25% of all COVID-19 deaths, and 7 states reported zero child deaths, and In states reporting, 0.00%-0.03% of all child COVID-19 cases resulted in death
So who cares if the vaccines further reduce this negiglable number of deaths. So what if it reduces the number of children who test positive.
IN ALL PROBABILITY MORE CHILDREN WILL HAVE ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM THE “VACCINE” THEN ARE SAVED FROM DEATH BY IT.
By David Israel, JEWISH PRESS
A grand-scale study that was conducted by scientists from Boston Children’s Hospital, Clalit Research Institute in Tel Aviv, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, that matched 94,354 adolescent vaccine recipients with 94,354 unvaccinated control adolescents, showed that the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (a.k.a. BNT162b2 mRNA) was highly effective in the first few weeks after vaccination against both documented infection and symptomatic Covid-19 with the delta variant among adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years.
The study (Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Delta Variant in Adolescents) was published Wednesday night in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Prof. Ran Balicer, Director of Health Policy Planning and Founding Director of Clalit Health Service’s Research Institute in Tel Aviv, noted that with the outbreak of the fourth wave following the Delta variant of the coronavirus, the question arose as to whether the existing vaccine in Israel also provides adequate protection against infection with this variant. He explained that the results of the study unequivocally show that the vaccine is most effective in reducing Delta variant infection and preventing symptomatic disease one week after receiving two doses.
According to Prof. Balicer, the results of the study show that the strength of protection against the Delta variant is very similar to that observed in young adults against the alpha strain six months ago. He added that these conclusions provide important and well-founded information for parents who are undecided about vaccinating their adolescent children.
The study authors noted that in a recent randomized trial involving 1983 vaccinated adolescents between the ages of 12 and 15 years with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, investigators estimated that the vaccine effectiveness of two doses of BNT162b2 was 100% against symptomatic infection by non-delta variants.
They concluded that their own observational study provides substantially more precise estimates of vaccine effectiveness among adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years for both documented infection and symptomatic disease in a setting in which the delta variant was predominant: “Our estimates of the effectiveness of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine against the delta variant among adolescents are similar to estimates of effectiveness against the alpha variant in the general population with the use of the same study design5 and are similar to the estimate of 88% (95% CI, 85 to 90) against the delta variant in the general population in an observational study that used a different design.”
Prof. Ben Reis of Boston Children’s Hospital said that the study provides well-founded scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing infection and serious illness among adolescents and regarding the effectiveness of the vaccine against the Delta variant, which is currently the dominant strain in Israel and around the world.
Concern shown in immense danger is appreciated !
Total FEAR of ruin and disgrace is what stops humans from
SCREAMING STOP TO ALL CLOSED MINDED MURDERERS……………..
They (those mentioned above) are highly educated unreasonable
non humans………………
Eddie
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X21001248
There has been a great deal of discussion recently regarding vaccine induce immunity vs natural immunity. An unmentioned topic to which there has always been a great deal of interest, but no data, was how the vaccine affected the immune system following a breakthrough case. To phrase that better, how would someone vaccinated who became Covid positive compare to someone never vaccinated who became Covid positive with regard to their immune system’s response – would the response of the vaccinated person be the same, better or worse than the unvaccinated person. The most recent Vaccine Surveillance report from England(https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf) gave us an insight into what has apparently been discovered, but not yet publicly shared, that is until now:
Alex Berenson wrote briefly about this in his substack(https://substack.com/profile/12729762-alex-berenson). The implications are that the existence of vaccine immunity prevents the body from forming an immune response to the whole virus even after the virus is exposed to the vaccinated person and the vaccinated person develops an infection from the virus. So, if this is correct, once you are vaccinated you will never have the full robust immunity to the entire virus which is provided by natural exposure to the virus. So immunity would be limited to antibody production to the Spike alone. There are other portions of the virus, such as the envelop(E-protein), and the membrane(M-protein) which are not addressed in the comment in the Surveillance report. The Surveillance report discusses the findings from UK Health Security Agency, but I have not seen anything beyond this report regarding this topic. It should be noted that a recent study released in May noted that “The BNT162b2[Pfizer] mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses”(https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520v1.full), but we don’t know the details or realities of these changes. This was yet another of the concerns of Dr. Vanden Bosshe which he warned about in the months following the rollout earlier this year.
It should be noted that the vaccine diminishes the immune system following the jab, particularly the second shot. If the vaccinated person develops Covid during this refractory period in which there has been evidence shown that upwards of 40-100% increases in Covid infections occur, this could explain the reduction in immune response and it might only be during this refractory period of 1-2 weeks that has affected the immune response. But to do this would require a great deal of people to become ill during this refractory period which could enlighten us on the topic of why so many Covid cases occur following vaccination.
The English data is not publicly available, much like that of Israel and the US, of course, so all we have is this single sentence notifying the public that this has been established at all by anyone. The governing authorities in these nations are likely all aware of this detail regarding the N-Protein, as they are likely aware of a great many other details of the vaccination experiments, especially regarding the immune response of breakthrough cases, of which the public is quite unaware, unfortunately.
The article makes no mention of any safety concerns nor does the study it is based upon. Vaccines need to be provide a protection from the disease they are aimed at, but they also need to do so without introducing any serious harms to those who are being vaccinated. There have been a total of ~542 children between 0 and 17yrs who have died from the Covid per CDC records since the outbreak began(https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Deaths-by-Sex-and-Age/9bhg-hcku). Per VAERS there have been 780 recorded cases of just myocarditis since the children began being jabbed earlier this summer – that is just with myocarditis and just for 1/3 of the age group comprable to the 542 deaths above. It is also ignoring any other form of injury upto and including deaths. It is well recognized that with myocarditis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459259/
In this study they claim they protected 88% of a group of children who never had any serious concern of harm from the disease. Yet, they injected 100% of these children with a compound known to produce myocarditis at some rate, yet they did not bother to actually check the children in this study for the this known harmful event.
Again why is there a mindless disregard for the injured. These children and their counterparts in the adult public are not just noise, as Dr. Barr described them, which should be heartlessly ignored. They each have a life, a family and a right to be protected from injury by unsafe biologic products. At some point this must become a concern for us all, especially for those support continuing the vaccine program.