US Mideast envoy in Bahrain: We changed the conversation

Bahrain FM: Palestinians made a mistake by boycotting summit. Arab finance ministers voice support for US economic peace plan. UAE: Having supported the Palestinians for 15 years, “now is the time to move forward.”

by  Ariel Kahana, i24NEWS , 
Israel Hayom Staff

US Mideast envoy in Bahrain: We changed the conversation
US Special Representative for International Negotiations Jason Greenblatt | Photo: AFP/Jaafar Ashtiyeh

As the ‘Peace for Prosperity’ conference in Bahrain came to an end on Wednesday, US Special Representative for International Negotiations Jason Greenblatt said that Washington was pleased with the summit, which unveiled the economic portion of Washington’s long-awaited peace plan.

The White House kicked off its bid for Israeli-Palestinian peace with the ambitious economic conference in Bahrain which it hopes will pave the way for a political resolution to the decades-long conflict.

The event and proposal, however, have been met with a lukewarm reception, with critics noting that the business-minded plan fails to address the most sensitive disputes at the core of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“We changed the conversation,” Greenblatt told i24NEWS, shrugging off criticism. “Nobody can create a situation that doesn’t include an economic package. What we heard from the investors is ‘we can make this happen. This is an investable type of project if the political solution is there.'”

The envoy emphasized the need for Israelis to be involved in any peace deal, insisting that in order to create a successful Palestinian economy, there “needs to be a connection with the Israeli economy. And we think that can happen quickly now that we’ve released the economic portion.”

Still, Greenblatt said the administration does not have a final timeline for the release of the political side of the US peace proposal, citing a “wrinkle” in its roll-out after a second Israeli election was called for September.

Palestinians with whom Greenblatt has been tasked with making peace have clashed often with the envoy, with senior Palestine Liberation Official Hanan Ashrawi labeling Greenblatt a “self-appointed advocate/apologist for Israel.”

Calling the plan “dead on arrival,” Palestinians have slammed the forthcoming US proposal as blatantly biased toward Israel, citing the transfer of the US Embassy to Jerusalem and the slashing of funds for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees as evidence the plan will not meet their demands.

Speaking at the conference, US President Donald Trump’s senior adviser Jared Kushner said that the White House did not intend to punish the Palestinians for their decision to boycott the Manama summit.

In an interview with Channel 13 and the Axios news site on Wednesday, Bahrain’s Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa said the Palestinians had made a mistake by boycotting the economic conference in Manama.

In what was the first interview by a Gulf official with an Israeli media outlet, the king said he hoped that by sitting down with an Israeli journalist, he hoped to ease Middle East tensions by talking directly to the Israeli public.

“Israel is part of this heritage of this whole region historically. So the Jewish people have a place amongst us. So communication needs to be a prerequisite for solving all of the dispute. We should talk.”

Of the Palestinians decision to skip the conference, he said, “It is always a mistake to miss an opportunity to achieve peace. … This was an opportunity that we wanted to see them here, but they chose not to come.”

In a message to Ramallah, he added, “It will not be a good idea to shun the role of the US in the peace process.”

Turning to Iran, the king called the Shiite Republic “a major threat to the security and stability of the region.” He said Tehran was exacerbating the Middle East conflict by providing resources to its proxies there and emphasized that Israel had the right to act again Iranian forces inside Syria.

As for the recent spike in tensions between the US and Iran, he said Tehran was pushing for war with its recent attacks on oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman and drone attacks from Yemen, among other provocations.

“This regime only survives with aggression. Only survives with exporting the Revolution. Only survives by taking control. So I think the restraint of the US is very wise,” he said.

Wrapping up the economic conference, Kushner said he was cautiously optimistic about the potential for the economic aspect of the plan to succeed.

Kushner said that many people he spoke with during the conference believe the US plan could be implemented if the conditions are right. He said ideas for moving forward on economic development would be examined in the coming days.

In fact, Arab finance ministers interviewed at the conference voiced support for the plan.

Saudi Finance Minister Mohammed al-Jadaan said Riyadh would support “anything that brings prosperity to the region” and that he was “very optimistic” about the prospects of the plan.

Noting Saudi Arabia’s support for the Palestinians, he said the conference had shown them there was an international commitment to bringing prosperity to the Palestinians.

The United Arab Emirates’ finance minister, Hamdan bin Rashid Al Maktoum, was more direct in his assessment.

“We need to give this initiative a chance. In order for it to succeed, we need international institutions. If this is the only initiative on the table, we need to give it a chance. We supported the Palestinians over the past 15 years, in order to keep the issue on the table. But now we need to move forward,” he said.

June 27, 2019 | 5 Comments »

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. An article in today’s Jerusalem Post by Abu Toameh says that 15 Palestinian businessmen in all attended the Bahrain conference, in defiance of the PLO regime and Abbas. One is now under arrest. A few have fled and are in hiding, although their homes have been searched by Abbas’ police.

    Encouraging disaffection with, and opposition to, the PLO regime on the part of wealthy Palestinian Arabs is in iIsrael’s, and America’s interest.

    The conversation has begun to change.

  2. There are enemies of Abbas who would like to take the Gulf States money even if they do not like Trump. Dahlan’s associates. Dahlan is a former Fatah leader in Gaza who was banished by Abbas. They would remove Abbas if they could. If Abbas dies or the PA falls apart Dahlan will certainly try and take over the PA.

    Tensions between top PA officials and the Dahlan associates they consider subversives threatening the PA’s security are nothing new but have grown in light of the severe economic downturn in the PA. Abbas loyalists think Dahlan and his group are taking advantage of the situation and stirring up trouble because they smell impending chaos in the PA and are preparing the ground for their leader’s return. Even as the crisis expands and PA staff are not being paid in full, Dahlan is offering them more emergency aid. Thus, his people are gaining power and the needy seek their help. A kind word about them whispered in Dahlan’s ear could perhaps help and perhaps guarantee survival in these tough times.

    The PA’s economic decline also greatly worries the Israeli political and security echelons. Israel has reportedly offered PA representatives various “creative solutions” to break the logjam created by Abbas’ determined refusal to accept funds that Israel owes the PA as long as Israel deducts from them the equivalent of the stipends paid to the families of terror attackers and jailed Palestinians. Both Israelis and Palestinians are well aware of the implications of a PA collapse. In addition to a projected increase in terror attacks and the security repercussions, Israel will have to provide massive humanitarian aid for residents of the West Bank while a war of succession is waged.

    It is no secret that among those contending for Abbas’ seat, Israel favors Dahlan. He would not make life easy for the Israelis, but Israel is familiar with his pluses and minuses. For Israel, someone who used to head the Gaza counterterrorism forces, fought Hamas and met with the heads of Israel’s security agencies will be better placed than others to rebuild the PA left behind by the elderly and embittered president.

    Read more: https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2019/06/israel-west-bank-gaza-strip-mahmoud-abbas-mohammed-dahlan.html#ixzz5sFAXacfa

  3. What the Trump plan cannot accomplish (J. Tobin Article in part below)

    The economic vision for the Palestinians isn’t new and won’t work. The intended beneficiaries have already rejected numerous opportunities to get the state they claim they want.

    Yet in analyzing the effort, it’s important to note that there’s a difference saying that the plan won’t succeed and saying that putting it forth was the wrong thing to do. That’s because the problem with it isn’t the content, but the context. An effort to shift the focus from a push on Israeli concessions, which are never enough to satisfy the Palestinians, to one in which Palestinian society could be transformed – economically and hopefully peaceably – was long overdue. But as long as the intended beneficiaries aren’t interested in such programs, the “ultimate deal” is simply not going to happen under any circumstances.

    nstead, they think emphasizing policies that will give the Palestinians a stake in peace and promoting measures that will mandate good governance have the potential to change everything. You can call that an attempt to “bribe” the Palestinians into accepting peace with Israel, but all it really amounts to is a reminder that coexistence would create a better reality than the current one rooted in conflict.

    Trump was right to try to end his predecessors’ coddling of Palestinian fantasies of defeating Israel, which is what their policies of non-recognition of Jerusalem and refusing to condition aid on ending support for terror amounted to.

    The problem is that the Palestinians’ century-old war on Zionism has become inextricably linked to their national identity to the point where it is impossible for anyone inside their political structure to imagine normal life alongside a Jewish state. And even if they could make that leap of imagination, entrenched forces like Hamas and other Islamist groups, as well as the millions of descendants of the 1948 Arab refugees who continue to hold onto the false hope of erasing the last 71 years of history, won’t let them act on it.

    That’s why Hamas continues to promote the “right of return” as if the eradication of the Jewish state was a viable option. And it’s why the Palestinian Authority continues to subsidize terror in the form of salaries for imprisoned terrorists, and pensions for their families and survivors, because to do otherwise would be to admit their defeat in a war that they haven’t the courage or the good sense to give up on.

    If Trump’s plan is going to fail – and it will – it can be attributed to these reasons. It’s not because previous administrations understood the conflict any better, or that the focus on economics is wrongheaded. If this latest approach doesn’t work, then the blame should fall on those responsible – the Palestinians – not on the ideas behind the plan itself.

  4. In what was the first interview by a Gulf official with an Israeli media outlet, the king said he hoped that by sitting down with an Israeli journalist, he hoped to ease Middle East tensions by talking directly to the Israeli public.

    “Israel is part of this heritage of this whole region historically. So the Jewish people have a place amongst us. So communication needs to be a prerequisite for solving all of the dispute. We should talk.”

    Even if the conference does not make any progress toward resolving the “Palestine question,” the improvement in Israel’s relationship with the Gulf states is an important goal in and of itself. This seems to be the first time that an Arab leader has at least by implication admitted theat the Jews are indigenous to Palestine and the Mideast as a whole, and they are not a foreign “colonialist settlers,” as the Arabs have always claimed. This marks some progress in the thought processes of at least one Arab ruler.

    If Israel can gradaually normalize relations with most of the Arab countries, the Palestinian terrorists will gradually become “irrelevant. ” Without the financial and political backing of the Arab world, Israel can then dismantle them (however you want to put it) with no trouble. A Palestinian government that is a puppet or client of Israel could then be installed, subject to full Israeli security control.