Peloni: Actually, contrary to Vance’s assertion that the Obama deal with Iran simply didn’t have enough safeguards in place to make it enforceable, the truth is that the problem with the Obama deal with Iran was that it was brokered with Iran by an American president who was unwilling to go to war in response to any violations discovered in the deal. While Trump has demonstrated his willingness to strike Iran, even for prolonged periods of time using a coordinated effort with Israel in doing so, Trump has simultaneously demonstrated a lack of political will to do more than threaten to Iran with taking steps needed to eliminate the regime entirely. While the distinction between Trump’s and Obama’s policies on enforcement may appear sizeable, they each left the Iranian regime with the means by which to survive, and survival of the regime is all that Mullahs and the IRGC need to win. And make no mistake about this fact, Iran sees itself as having won the war, as it will soon see that it has won the peace as well, specifically because the safeguards which Vance asserts will keep Iran in compliance with the coming deal do not carry with it the political will to end the Iranian regime when the deal fails to be fulfilled by the Mullahs. Lacking the will to do what is needed to end the Iranian regime is what brought Trump to the negotiating table, and this is true of Obama as well, and this common motivation between the two different tracts of negotiations is what will see the Mullahs resurrect its nuclear ambitions in the future knowing that no matter what, the Americans lack the will to see any action thru to its completion as has been so well demonstrated by first Obama and now Trump.
Video Loads Below
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.