What works and why it works

From The CoV Frontlines…4-20-20

By Dr Michael Hirt, MD

After more than six weeks of helping my patients successfully avoid and fight Covid-19 (CoV), I am writing to provide my perspective on what works, why it works, and how you and your family can stay safe.

Before the pandemic hit Los Angeles, I developed an in-office, infection control strategy to keep both ourselves and our healthy patients safe, while providing critical health care access to ill patients. Sick patients have a separate entrance into the office, are masked and gloved before entering, and then are placed in private waiting and treatment rooms. Industrial air scrubbers were placed in all exam rooms and communal areas to prevent cross-contamination.

As a testament to the effectiveness of this operational strategy, my staff and I have remained healthy while caring for all of our patients.

In my office, we have seen dozens of CoV and related viral cases. I say ‘related’ because the quality of early testing has been unreliable. Many patients who clearly have CoV symptoms, have had blood tests consistent with CoV infections, and responded to CoV treatments were testing negative for CoV on nasal swabs, saliva, and antibody testing. So, either the testing was not accurate, CoV has mutated (think Covid-20), or both.

Also reported in the past week are the results of random community testing for CoV antibodies. The purpose of these studies was to determine just how many people have already had CoV but did not know it, either because they had no symptoms or the symptoms were so mild as to have an insignificant impact on their health. The results of these studies indicate that up to 85 times more people have been infected with and completely recovered from CoV than had been previously thought. Extrapolating these numbers to the general population of California would mean that over 2.3 million people in our state have already had CoV.

This means that the overall death rate of CoV is dramatically lower than previously thought and is similar to that of a bad flu virus.

The studies also tell us how to respond to the CoV pandemic because we now know that our focus should not be on how many people might contract the virus but who will contract the virus. It is clear that CoV is a virus that picks on grandparents, not grandkids. In Los Angeles county, 89% of all CoV fatalities have had other underlying medical conditions that caused these patients to get sicker…quicker. These CoV at-risk medical conditions include high blood pressure, diabetes, lung diseases, and heart disease.

And for all those between the ages of 40 and 64, it has been my clinical experience that this population also tends to have fairly mild but sometimes more moderate flu-like symptoms, including a chest heaviness, chest pains, and shortness of breath. Very rarely, a patient in this age bracket can have severe CoV lung disease, but this remains very uncommon as a percentage of all those who have contracted CoV.

In attempting to keep the 40 to 64 year olds from progressing into a personal CoV crisis, treatment needs to be given early in the course of the illness. This means that these patients should be seen and tested for CoV ideally within the first five days of symptoms. However, the first CoV symptoms tend to be fairly mild: fatigue, low grade fever, dry cough and headache. So, many patients wait at home, thinking that they are not sick enough to come to the doctor’s office. This is a mistake because CoV pneumonia can happen as soon as seven to eight days after the relatively benign CoV symptoms start.

If my team can get to patients with mild to moderate symptoms, we can start the life-saving treatments that include scientifically-supported prescription medications, intravenous therapies, and nutritional supplements. These treatment protocols have provided significant relief to all of our affected patients, and none thus far, have required any advanced hospital care or ventilator support.

These effective CoV treatments work much like a fire extinguisher works to put out small house fires. If you get to the fire when it is still small and manageable, a fire extinguisher is a remarkably effective tool. If you wait until the fire has begun to consume more than one room, then you will need a fire hose to put out the fire. This doesn’t mean that fire extinguishers do not work, only that they work best (and are less damaging than a fire hose) when used early.

The lesson here is that if you have any cold or flu-like symptoms, you should get tested right away and then treated promptly to prevent unnecessary worsening of the CoV illness.

So, based on my ‘frontline’ experience, the CoV science, and the reported CoV population/infection data, grandchildren and young adults can restart their lives right now, but grandparents and other vulnerable populations need to remain in quarantine. Those between the ages of 40 and 64 can also safely venture out and get back to work in an organized rollout, but need to see a healthcare provider and get tested within the very first days of any respiratory symptoms. This includes patients who think that their runny nose, sore throat, and tickle cough are just their usual ‘allergy’ when these benign symptoms could represent the start of a more serious CoV illness.

To make testing readily available to all who need it, my office was amongst the first to offer drive through, nasal swab testing. In addition to nasal swab testing, we offer CoV saliva testing (just spit in a cup), five-minute antibody testing (to see if you’re still fighting or done with CoV), and blood serology testing (to see if you were previously exposed to CoV). Blood serology testing can also be ordered at any local Quest lab near you for your convenience.

As the World reopens, there will be more CoV cases. And that is OK, as long as we keep CoV from reaching the elderly and the vulnerable. Remember, it is not how many people get CoV but who gets CoV. Everyone else who is not at increased risk can be safely treated or evaluated in doctor’s offices, via telehealth, and drive-through testing.

And California is doing great from a collective CoV health standpoint. We continue to have one of the lowest per capita CoV death rates (number of deaths per million population) in the US and the world. Our per capita death rate on par with states like Idaho, Kentucky, Kansas and Tennessee. And we compare more favorably than Austria, Netherlands, and Sweden, all countries that have started to reopen their economies.

CoV related deaths in Los Angeles County and California seemed to have peaked on April 19th and death rates have declined to levels that were last seen in early April. Additionally, hospitalizations and ICU admissions are also quickly trending down. Our CoV curve has been successfully flattened. We know who still needs our collective protection. We have effective treatment strategies for our workforce.

These are the criteria for taking the heavy foot off of the economic brakes and applying some thoughtful pressure to the accelerator that throttles California’s businesses.

Michael Hirt, MD

April 22, 2020 | 6 Comments » | 653 views

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

6 Comments / 6 Comments

  1. Extremely helpful article and very useful suggestions from Dr. Hurt. From my own layman’s internet research, but relying on studies by competition physicians and statisticians, I have concluded that, when left alone, the SARS CoViD-2 virus causes a rise in deaths for about three weeks, then begins to subside. Soon there are few or even no cases after “peak.” But the continued lockdown will greatly prolong the life of the virus by depriving people of the fresh air and sunshine they need to recover, and preventing them from gaining immunity through contact with “infected” but asymptomatic people, and creating “herd immunity ” for everyone.

    Lockdowns and home isolation is a cure much worse than the disease. But I suspect there are some power-hungry medical bureaucrats and some greedy industrial monopolists who like it that way. And that’s what the coronavirus “emergency” is really all about.

  2. “The Public Health Agency[of Sweden] has withdrawn its report on the model of the coronavirus spread in Stockholm, which it shared yesterday at the daily press conference. The report had suggested that by May 1st, a third of Stockholm’s population would have contracted the coronavirus.

    On its Twitter account, the agency wrote: “We have discovered an error in the report and the report authors are currently going through the material again. We will republish the report as soon as it is ready”. They said they would share more information about the nature of the error once this was done.

    The report said that there were around 1,000 times as many people infected by the coronavirus in Sweden as the number of confirmed cases, a figure that was questioned by Swedish journalist Emanuel Karlsten at the press conference as it did not match up with the rest of the report’s figures. There are currently over 15,000 confirmed cases of the virus in Sweden, and 1,000 times this figure would amount to more than the country’s entire population.

    Asked by a reporter from Ekot what the error was, state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell said that an updated version of the report would be ready by tomorrow (April 23rd) and that the wrong variable was added in at the start when creating the model.

    But Tegnell said that two of the report’s main conclusions — that the peak would have been reached around April 15th, and that by May 1st around a third of Stockholmers would have been infected — were not affected by the error.

    He also said that none of the agency’s recommendations and measures had been put in place based on this report.

    This news comes as another report on the spread of the coronavirus in Stockholm — this one by researchers at Karolinska University Hospital and the Karolinska Institute — has also been withdrawn by its authors.

    That report suggested that at least 11 out of 100 had developed antibodies, with the real figure believed to be higher. At the time of publication, clinical microbiologist Jan Albert said the research was still at an early stage, saying: “You cannot draw conclusions about the exact percentages, but we know that those 11 percent have had (the coronavirus). It is not enough for a research report, but too important to keep under wraps.”

    Today Albert told SVT that the researchers were “not confident” about their results.” This is from the web site thelocal.se, which is designed for English-speaking exppatriates living in Sweden. It suggests to me that one reason Sweden’s public health authorities are not much concerned about the “pandemic” is that they believe that the deaths in sweden, which now number about 2,000, are only a very small percentage of those infected, and that most or at least a very large number of Swedes have acquired immunity. Only time will tell is their health authorities “dissident” approach is the right one.

  3. California early on got the virus and the governor locked the state down and implemented social distancing. It worked.

    California has only 37 deaths per million people. It has 1438 deaths Compared to:

    NJ which has 570 deaths per million, 5063 deaths
    NY has 1,060 deaths per million, 20,000+ deaths
    Sweden 200 deaths per million 2000+ deaths
    Holland 244 deaths per million 4177 deaths
    Belgium 560 deaths per million 6490 deaths

    ‘Herd immunity’ without a vaccine could mean 840,000 coronavirus deaths in California
    Gov. Newsom says things will be normal when we have “herd immunity.” Here’s why that could be scary.


  4. COVID-19 has focused its attacks on Western Europe, North America, Iran and one province of China. The rest of the world got let off lightly. There is little in the casualty counts, to commend any treatment as especially “efficacious”.

    What those counts DO reveal, is the stark difference between the Western Great Powers of modern history (the US, Canada, UK, Sweden, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal) and the rest of the world. The hardest hit localities, moreover, were New York, Brussels and Northern Italy — the political and commercial centers of the world.

    Al Qaeda could not have targeted Modern Western Civilization any better than this “randomly” spread pandemic. The fact that the countries I singled out could correspond to the “ten great horns” and “one little horn” mentioned by the books of Daniel and Revelation shows an eschatological, not clinical, pattern.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.