Did Bibi have to pay for the veto?

Aluf Benn reports Egypt is no longer committed to an alliance with Israel against Iran

After pointing out the reversal of allowing the Iranian ships to pass through the Suez Canel whereas previously it allowed Israel to go through, he discusses the ptential repercussions of the veto.

    [..] Bolstered with Congressional support, Netanyahu forced U.S. President Barack Obama into the veto – which he had avoided using to date. The Americans argued that internationalization of the conflict cannot replace direct negotiations, and that forced decisions will only result in parties taking up more extreme positions.

    It is not yet clear what Obama will try to get from Netanyahu in return: a plan for the establishment of a Palestinian state in the territories, or acceptance of an American peace plan. The U.S. president will argue that Washington needs to bolster its credibility in the Arab world and that Israel must contribute its lot to ensure that the new regimes in the area are friendly.

    Now that Labor has been kicked out of the coalition, the government is breaking to the right. In the coming weeks, Netanyahu will have to maneuver between the threats issued by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and international pressure. Having lost his friend Mubarak, this will be even more difficult than in the past.

February 20, 2011 | 1 Comment »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

1 Comment / 1 Comment

  1. “Now that Labor has been kicked out of the coalition, the government is breaking to the right.”

    I have yet to see evidence of this:

    “PM: Crossing of Iranian warships viewed with UTMOST GRAVITY — JP”

    Oh me! Oh my! When those ships deliver missles to Hizbullah, Bibi will get VERY DISPLEASED and threaten to GET UPSET!

    Is this what constitutes “breaking to the right”?