Ezra Levant of http://rebelnews.com joins The Alex Jones Show to paint a bleak picture of the future of free speech.
https://banned.video/watch?id=5de996a0ec9cd8002514e10c
We are indebted to Alex Jones and Ezra Levant for leading the charge to protect us. This is a very scary segment that must be watched.
At 22:40 Jones tells that he was approached three years ago by a NYT operative who warned him to stop attacking Islam, to stop protecting the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms) and to stop attacking transgenderism or he would be destroyed. Then they added that he should stop defending Pres Trump.
You better believe it. The globalists are out to destroy our values and way of life.
@ Adam Dalgliesh:
Adam thanks for the effort in making this available…I hope you can watch this 6 part series by naomi Oresges…There was a time when the Govts of US were on board with global warming and naomi gives the definitive answer as to what happened…her strength is in climate history. Sound on part 5 is faulty.
@ Felix Quigley: The URL for this copy of the report is https://ijhpr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2045-4015-2-23
@ Felix Quigley: I’m sorry that my URL did not enable you to access this report. I am posting what I think was the same report, or a very similar one, from another site.
Felix Quigley Said:
I fail to read that the co2 that is released into the atmosphere causes the temperature to rise. But let’s say it does. Are you saying athoratively that the man made increase in co2 in the atmosphere is significant given the amount of co2 released from the oceans. As I understand it, it is an infiantessimal percentage of the whole increase.
So the cycle starts with a rise in temperature not caused by man and then a further rise due to the release of co2 from the oceans. According to this theory, temperature would continue to rise causing even more co2 to be released. But it doesn’t increase forever. Nature reverses the process and we have an ice age.
Man played no part in this cycle. Yet you want me to believe that man’s infitessimal increase in the Co2 levels must be addressed at humongous cost. That’s where you lose me.
@ Felix Quigley:
I just noticed this article about the rise in temperature in Israel. I notice that the article simply records the fact of climate change. As you know I fully accept the fact of climate change.
but the article says nothing about what caused it.
As I try to suppress my anger at Israpundit editor Ted Belman not reporting on global warming in Israel, and instead pursuing an ideological war rather than report facts, i read more things. Israel has a key scientist on the world stage, jim salinger, who lives in the Mount Carmel region of Israel, and writes accurately. A personal note…I myself live int he Murcia region of Spain, for how long more is a question, and i have had direct experience of high temperature, and is also connected to my personal struggle with a local Spanish peasant who keeps his dog, with no name, tied up in a metal barrel, under such heat. My thermometer went up to 50 Celsius and the heat has broken it. The heat exceeded 50 Celcius!
“Thirty-five degrees Celsius is the threshold value of wet bulb temperature beyond which any exposure for more than six hours would probably be intolerable even for the fittest of humans, resulting in hyperthermia (overheating) and death.
The body can cope through perspiration and evaporation provided that the wet bulb temperature – a measure of humidity or degree of mugginess – remains below 35C.
A graphic example of this was illustrated in Death Valley in 1932 when the highest temperature on earth ever was reached at 56.7C.
Flocks of birds entered the area then plummeted to their death from heat exhaustion.
A recent study in the scientific journal Nature concludes that projections in the MENA are likely to approach and exceed this critical threshold (35C) wet bulb temperature under the business-as-usual scenario, making areas not survivable.”
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=12037543
The average temperature in the country has risen by 1.4 degrees Celsius (2.52 degrees Fahrenheit) from 1950 to 2017
https://www.timesofisrael.com/report-israel-to-get-hotter-drier-barring-major-reduction-in-greenhouse-gases/
And rising. This is the average temperature and 1.4 degrees Celsius is enormous and i think also “What about the wildlife? What is this increase in heat doing to the wildlife who can only react and not speak”
Yet Ted Belman keeps this information OUT OF Israpundit.
@ Ted Belman:
Ted Belman has said “So what? That changes nothing.” but this was in response to my charge which I vouched really as a suspicion that Belman and Zorn knew nothing about basic physics of global warming, really the relationship in very basic terms between sun and earth.
If Ted knows nothing about this then that places him in the position of a slavish follower, in this case of certain sites which are calling themselves the “right”, and simply slavishly publishing heir articles.
But thank goodness new information about science in Israel has introduced a totally new way of looking at things because this brings global warming into the heart of Israel. This is no longer an academic debate.
And still waiting on a response from Belman and Zorn to this information about science in Israel on the issue of global warming.
Make no mistake about it we are at last getting to the heart of the politics of the issue of global warming on Israpundit. It goes to fundamentals.
@ Felix Quigley:
Adam it is the delay that is the real killer. This series on youtube is very helpful to understand the roots of these doubters and the meaning of the doubting…a la Thomas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVPIA6l2OTg
@ Adam Dalgliesh:
Adam that news really does sadden me
Please check the url as it does not work for me and gives “Page not available”
@ Ted Belman:
That is far from the present. That is actually aeons ago in the main.
We are talking here about the effct of man on the earth. That is the essence, and not just capitalist man either,
But there is an understanding of what you write
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm
@ Felix Quigley: Felix, somewhere or other you asked “what are climate scientists in Israel saying and doing about climate change? ” This article should give you the answer: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707789/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707789/ The Israel meteorological service says that Israel’s climate has been getting hotter since it began measuring temperatures in Israel. Also, getting drier. It predicts that these trends will continue until at least 2100, and will have a disasterous effect on Israel, causing a major water shortage in the country and severe health impacts on the population, especially “vulnerable” groups such as children, the elderly, the ill, etc. Ted, do you think these Israeli meteorologist are leftist conspirators too, like the U.S. and British meteorological services? Are weather reporting agencies around the world really hotbeds of leftist conspiracies?
Felix Quigley Said:
No doubt yopu will argue that CO2 is increasing due to the burning of fossil feul. Bu the records over the millenium say that temperature rises befor the CO2 level rises. Yet you maintain the reverse.
@ Felix Quigley:
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2014/04/26/former-nasa-scientist-global-warming-is-nonsense/
Ted Belman…can I refer you specifically to this paragraph which I wrote:
“Are you even aware that the sun in heating our earth works through the atmosphere, and so this leads us to a consideration of the gases in the atmosphere, that is the gases which make up the atmosphere. I have never once saw either you or Zorn refer to this. perhaps you can start today from that point and go on from there.”
Perhaps you can explain what are your views on this?
In my view we are past the point where you as editor of Israpundit need to state your own views and not rely on dubious sources from the “Right”. That is just too easy.
We often hear it said that the heating of earth is due to the sun, in the specific sense that the sun controls our climate. this is an argument that is often made by global warming deniers.
This is so serious because it draws attention away from the role of the atmosphere, and there is an added issue here, by drawing attention away from the atmosphere they also draw attention away from global warming gases in the atmosphere, the main but not only one being carbon dioxide.
Ted Belman you have seen an example of this from Sebastien Zorn above who refers to carbon dioxide only in one of its aspect, that is plants, and not the other that is as a global warming gas in the atmosphere. That is sheer dishonesty, or maybe just unwitting ignorance, on the part of Zorn. i hope Ted Belman you dissociate from that.
@ Peter Dale:
Peter Dale it is embarrassingly easy to demolish your arguments based on two frauds
This is not an argument. This is in no way an argument. the opposite also holds, that the cost of NOT dealing with Global Warming may be a thousand times more prohibitive.
carbon Dioxide is the main warming gas in the atmosphere
What literature? You have introduced the man so can we know the literature he cites
the variation of the earth orbit is raised but/and this proceeds on a timespan of 100,000 years if my memory is correct (Milankovitch cycles describe the collective effects of changes in the Earth’s movements on its climate over thousands of year)…PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE DECEIVING REFERENCES
And the “sun cycle”…with due respect that expression is too imprecise to mean much.
In conclusion resent day global warming has got nothing to do with that. It is caused by carbon dioxide entering, being put into, the atmosphere at what can truthfully be called a “frantic” rate
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Sebastien Zorn
Actually, everything has been questioned. Whether there is global change that is significant compared to such changes throughout recorded history, whether the earth is warming or cooling, whether carbon dioxide is good or bad — plants breathe it in and breathe out oxygen, whether man has anything to do with it. They have been using computer models that don’t conform with observed reality and they haven’t been observing it closely for very long. It’s a scam intended as a tool of global social engineering. Sometimes they admit it.
But not answered or refuted in any scientific manner. if so state where.
There has never been such a change since man came on earth
the earth is warming at a rapid rate over the past 150 years and especially over the past 70 or so
yes but carbon dioxide also enters in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is also a greenhouse gas. Carbon dioxide has an effect on the heating of the earth. The old saying “you can have too much of a good thing” applies here
In what way do the computer models not conform with reality? That is an opinion. Back it up with information. until you back that up with some data that is just an opinion. Please urgently back it up since you make the assertion.
What do you mean by “it”. I take it you mean climate. And they have been observing “it” for a very long time indeed. Do you not know?
Here you show extreme disrespect for global science. What gives you the credentials to do that
Your two examples. 1. AOC is not representative of climate science and yet I say she has a right to her point of view and 2. the only point about that article is that Greta is reaching the opinion that the capitalist system is bankrupt and cannot solve this problem, only intensify the problem. Which they have caused. And is her right to say so if she believes it.
@ Felix Quigley:
So what? That changes nothing.
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Your two references, which i have read, are of not much use to anything. AOC is a spokesman for herself. I do not like her politics, but so what.
““Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,” he added.”
In contrast I am talking about global warming so can we deal with that and not veer off.
Also with Greta. i fail to see why you quote this. She wants to stop global warming, is coming to the conclusion the system of capitalism is not going to do this, so she voices the view that the system of capitalism needs to be ended. it is a viewpoint and i commend her for stating the truth. What is your beef exactly?
@ Ted Belman:
Ted Belman you completely do not understand the issue of global warming, which is just a descriptive term, and describes the heating of the earth by the sun through the medium of atmospheric gases.
I have a sense that people like you and Sebastien Zorn do not even understand the basic physics connected with the heating of the earth. Why do I sense that…because i have never once known you to refer to the basic physics involved in the heating of the earth.
For example when you wrote your essay on the historical Jesus you dealt with the physical reality of the Jews living in Judea at that time, the reality of the Romans and so on. But not on this issue. You do a different thing here.
Are you even aware that the sun in heating our earth works through the atmosphere, and so this leads us to a consideration of the gases in the atmosphere, that is the gases which make up the atmosphere. I have never once saw either you or Zorn refer to this. perhaps you can start today from that point and go on from there.
@ Ted Belman:
Actually, everything has been questioned. Whether there is global change that is significant compared to such changes throughout recorded history, whether the earth is warming or cooling, whether carbon dioxide is good or bad — plants breathe it in and breathe out oxygen, whether man has anything to do with it. They have been using computer models that don’t conform with observed reality and they haven’t been observing it closely for very long. It’s a scam intended as a tool of global social engineering. Sometimes they admit it.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/03/climate-strikes-greta-thunberg-calls-for-system-change-not-climate-change-here-s-what-that-could-look-like
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-the-green-new-deal-is-not-about-climate-change/
That is why I suggested reading Darwall’s books; he deals in some detail with these issues. One of his central arguments, exemplified by the German experience, is that the cost is prohibitive. Even more to the point is Rex J. Fleming’s ‘The Rise and Fall of the Carbon Dixoide Theory of Climate Change’ and the literature he cites to question how much is due to human beings and how much is due to other forces, such as the variation in the earth orbit and the sun cycle. Rex Fleming is also on youtube.
@ Felix Quigley:No one disputes there is climate change. What’s in dispute is whether such change is man made. Secondly it is disputed that the medicine is worth taking. It may make an insignificant difference at an outrageous cost.
Perhaps people should consider reading two books written by Rupert Darwall: ‘The Age of Global Warming’ and ‘Green Tyranny’. He is especially good in presenting Germany’s experience with ‘going green’. And it’s not a happy one. Germans are using renewables; they are reverting to burning wood. But not from their Black Forest. Rather wood from old growth forests in North America. Darwall also shows the origins of the green movement in the Nazi election manifesto of 1933. And he poses the question of whether the climate change movement is really about climate change or about the transformation of the capitalist economies of the West. (Hint: it’s about transforming the economy) You can also find Darwall on youtube if you want to get a hint of what’s in the books.
@ Ted Belman:
The earth is either warming or the earth or it is not
By a significant amout or an insignificant amount
There is melting of the polars or not
There is melting of the glaciers or not
There is effect on animals of warming or there is not
Surely we can find the answers to these questions. What is the mystery?
Where are the Israeli scientists on this? Is Israel not producing scientists who are studying global climate? What do they say? Who are they?
@ Edgar G.:
Edgar…everythign above you say about Jones is correct. i am focussing ont he way he promotes this isue of Epstein and the sad situation that ted is not fighting against Jones, and through jones
“Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad asset who was used by Israeli intelligence to blackmail American politicians, according to a former Israeli spy.
Ari Ben-Menashe, a former Israeli spy and alleged “handler” of Robert Maxwell, told the authors of a new book, Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales, that Epstein ran a “complex intelligence operation” at the behest of Mossad.
Believing that Epstein planned to marry his daughter, Maxwell introduced him and Ghislaine Maxwell to Ben-Menashe’s Mossad circle.
“Maxwell sort of started liking him, and my theory is that Maxwell felt that this guy is going for his daughter,” Ben-Menashe said. “He felt that he could bless him with some work and help him out in like a paternal [way].”
Israeli intelligence bosses gave the green light and Epstein then became a Mossad asset.
“They were agents of the Israeli Intelligence Services,” said Ben-Menashe.
When it became clear that Epstein wasn’t very competent at doing much else, his primary role became “blackmailing American and other political figures.”
“Mr. Epstein was the simple idiot who was going around providing girls to all kinds of politicians in the United States,” said Ben-Menashe. “See, fucking around is not a crime. It could be embarrassing, but it’s not a crime. But fucking a fourteen-year-old girl is a crime. And he was taking photos of politicians fucking fourteen-year-old girls — if you want to get it straight. They would just blackmail people, they would just blackmail people like that.”
There’s also a Mossad connection to a different kind of sex offender; Harvey Weinstein.
Weinstein reportedly hired ex-Mossad agents to suppress allegations against him. Working for an Israeli firm called Black Cube, these agents pressured witnesses and tried to intimidate journalist Ronan Farrow in order to “bury the truth” about Weinstein’s activity.
In response to the above I wrote on my facebook the following:
ALEX JONES IS PUSHING THE NASTIEST CONSPIRACY THEORIES AGAINST ISRAEL AND JEWS
Alex Jones is pushing the modern Protocols of Zion conspiracy against Jews
Jones is a big time American Fascist type who has a desperate hatred for Israel, and because of that hatred of Israel, for Jews because Israel is the only state of the Jews. This is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion content being brought into political dialogue in 2019.”
Let us deal Edgar with the central issue. Israel is a small country with a history of hatred against Jews going back into the ages. It IS small.
In 1973 very false thinking left Israel unprepared for the attack from Arabs in the 1973 war. This undoubtedly had an effect on Jews who are in the leadership of Intelligence.
So israeli Intellignce does what it can.
Now these horrible claims are being made again against Jews. That Jews are involved in the wholesale raping of underage girls, that is children, and indeed according to the ultra nationalist Jones American Children. That is the content. Always children in these antisemitic circles.
Without any proof!
This comes also out of the dirty antisemitism of the British ruling classes because a very big antisemitic meme in Britain was that Maxwell was a Mossad agent and a SPY!
These antisemites associated with Jones even made a big play on the fact that Maxwell was buried in Israel. How antisemitic is that!
This latest action is also promoted by Hannity who is another unprincipled character, all based on the word essentially of one person who claims he was ex Mossad. And a dubious book ont he same themes that Hannity promotes. And where Hannity goes so does Trump.
I would remind Ted Belman that if people are making claims that Jews, Israel, Mossad, are involved in the raping of girls, and American girls at that, then we ask for some proof.
And there is none. That is the whole point.
This IS Protocols brought into our own day, at this time.
As regards Ezra Levant if he is such an up front guy, a defender of Tommy Robinson, come right out and clear up his association with Jones.
@ Mike Barry:
Every right wing site I am familiar with wears the badge proudly. e.g. American Thinker, Gateway Pundit, Canada Free Press, etc. I don’t know of any that believe in man made climate change.
Sad!
@ Felix Quigley:
I recall, a year or two ago, that as soon as I realised that Ted was posting Jones regularly, I wrote in that I’d listened to him a few times, and was convinced he was crazy, certainly a half mad conspiracy mashuggena. I though that he had been banned from public broadcasting. I see that I was wrong.
Felix Quigley Said:
I don’t know what lies he is alleged to have told, but being a man made climate change denier is a badge of honour that many of us wear.
As for the story on Espstein being a mossad agent, it is plausible. What proof is there that he was not? I’ll listen.
@ Ted Belman:
I am not sure who is saying what in the above but perhaps my fault for not watching the videos. I hope to.
My problem is with Ezra Levant who is a liar on the issue of global warming, which keeps coming into everything today.
Then there is Alex Jones featured in pleasant garb in the above piece introduced by Ted, Jones…who I would not believe if he told me the sun was going to rise tomorrow.
Then there is the lack of any warning by you Ted re Alex Jones, on just about everything to do with Israel and Jews.
In particular a link of Alex Jones with David Icke who is the most shady and anti Israel anti Jewish person on the planet.
So Levant a climate denier
Close associate of Jones it seems now
Jones is now promoting fascist slander of Israel in the case of Epstein slanders being made, against Mossad/Israel/Jews
https://www.infowars.com/epstein-was-a-mossad-agent-used-to-blackmail-american-politicians-says-former-israeli-spy/
Ezra finds the bravery of young people in Hong Kong for standing up to tyranny commendable. He should have extended his shout out to the brave Iraqis and Iranians who are putting their lives on the line, literally, to oppose the Mullahs.