North Korea and Iran. The Nuclear Outcome of Strategic Patience

By Barry Shaw, CFP

While American politics are in melt down mode over the Democrats almost yearlong obsession in trying to find a scintilla of evidence with which they can hang Trump on charges of colluding with the Russians, both North Korea and Iran have been busy getting on with developing their nuclear missile programs.

North Korean President Kim Jong-Un has blatantly carried out a series of missile tests that show their capability of launching a nuclear missile strike that will put the west coast of the United States within range.

When President Trump warned North Korea of the “fire and fury, never seen before” should they test America’s patience, some Democrats and Obama hang-overs, such as Ben Rhodes, the White House Deputy National Security Secretary under President Obama, accused Trump on MSNBC of “extreme and false statements about all manner of things. It’s more concerning,” he said, “when they are about nuclear weapons.”

So who gets it? Ben Rhodes, or President Trump? Rhodes introduced a security policy of “strategic patience.” Rhodes, it should be remembered, was an ardent promoter of Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran which rewarded the Islamic Republic to the tune of $150 Billion while allowing them to continue their intercontinental ballistic missile development program.

Compare Rhodes criticism to Trump’s statement to Donald Trump’s comments about making nuclear deals with regimes like North Korea on an NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ TV interview in October 1999. That was a decade and a half before Donald Trump entered politics. Here is what he said about the Administration’s refusal, or inability, to adequately close down North Korea’s nuclear program, “Do you want to do it in five years when they have warheads all over the place, each one of them pointing at New York and Washington, is that when you want to do it, or do you want to do it now?”

In that interview, Trump talking about the US negotiators, and using his familiar verbal style, added that the North Korean leaders “are laughing at us. They think we’re a bunch of dummies.”

Who can say, faced with today’s crisis, that Trump was wrong?

The most recent North Korean testing has seen them use their missile launch capability for carrying miniaturized nuclear weapons which they announced would be placed on their warships to aim at Guam. This is not new technology or intelligence. Revelations show that the US Military Intelligence reported this technology to the Obama Administration back on April 2013, but, operating on Ben Rhodes’s “strategic patience” paradigm, President Obama decided to deny the contents of this intelligence assessment, and do nothing about it. In other words, they covered up the intelligence as being politically inconvenient. Strategic patience bathed in denial has resulted in North Korea arriving at this dangerous moment for the United States and the Trump Administration.

It is worth reminding ourselves that Wendy Sherman was one of the architects of both the North Korean and the Iranian nuclear deals. The North Korean deal was used as the US template for the negotiations with Tehran over their advanced nuclear program. Both were based on the fallacy of a strategic patience policy of “let’s go easy on them and see what happened in ten years’ time.”

How did the US Intelligence and the Obama Administration allow this dramatic national security failure to occur? This should be required study for leading Strategic and National Security think tanks.

The strategic patience policy is a frightening failure. It is nothing more than politically kicking the can down the road to be picked up by a future Administration when it is about to explode in a mushroom cloud.

America is in crisis mode right now. They are scrambling to come up with a solution to the North Korean nuclear threat, but there appears to be no good solution in sight, particularly when you are dealing with unpredictable rogue regimes. Conflict seems inevitable.

This is the consequence of kicking that can down the road. Tomorrow, they will wake up to the same crisis when Iran takes the wraps off their project and are ready for a nuclear breakout.

August 14, 2017 | 1 Comment » | 346 views

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

1 Comment / 1 Comment

  1. Who can say, faced with today’s crisis, that Trump was wrong?”

    Answer: Nobody. I said they would retreat if confronted with a credible threat and they did. Totalitarians always do except when they are looking for an excuse to go to war anyway, in which case, the outcome would still be war but on our terms. Usually, calling their bluff prevents escalation and appeasement causes it. But our counter-threat must be believable to work which is why we must always follow through or it has the opposite effect as we have seen. (I am starting to see the reason behind the apparent irrationality behind the inability to take back one’s word in the ancient world as seen in the stories of Jacob v. Esau and Mordechai and Esther v. Haman.
    In the latter, To save face, the king couldn’t rescind his order permitting the antisemites to arm and exterminate the Jews so he issued another order allowing the the Jews to arm on an earlier date and wipe out the antisemites. Great story. I doubt many Jews even know how it ends or it wouldn’t be the sanitized tale for children everbody celebrates. Assuming it wasn’t a novel written during that era, a form of catharsis for a helpless and frustrated people. The characters and the descriptions of life in the palace have been confirmed as something only someone who lived there and then could have known but not the story, itself. Yet, anyway.)

    “North Korea’s Kim puts Guam attack on hold
    North Korean leader receives report on Guam attack plans but will hold off for now, says North Korean media.”
    Elad Benari, 15/08/17 04:03

Leave a Reply