No point talking about a ‘post-Hamas’ era until we actually finish the job
T. Belman. Bottom line is that no one can do this job of policing Gaza, as Netanyahu intends, other than the IDF.
JINSA reported:
The assessment estimated that an Israeli military government in Gaza would cost over $5.3 billion a year, excluding reconstruction costs. The assessment, which was reviewed by Ynet News, also found that such a scenario would require 400 Israeli staffers and five IDF divisions.
Not only that, many soldiers would be killed just as they were in Lebanon until Israel retreated. Netanyahu understands that. He will no doubt shift responsibility to the local clans that he will empower as soon as possible. Netanyahu said:
“I am not prepared to switch from Hamastan to Fatahstan,”
Neither are most Israelis.
Analysis: Gallant’s criticism against Netanyahu has some merit, but he neglects to acknowledge the complexity of the issue; No one can even contemplate ruling Gaza until Hamas is completely vanquished, and the only one who can do that is Israel
Yoav Gallant laid out his vision for the future of Gaza in a message that resonated with cabinet members and journalists alike. Gallant firmly believes that the path to a stable post-Hamas enclave, lies in the establishment of Palestinian control backed by international support.
Gallant envisions this as the antidote to the entrenched reign of terror in Gaza. He argued that failing to make a decisive move would inevitably lead to the creation of an Israeli military and civilian administration in Gaza—a scenario he deems a security and strategic danger for Israel.














