T. Belman. There are two paths to judicial reform. Either change the judges or change the law. The latter restricts the wiggle room of the judges from supporting a non-Zionist agenda. Or do both. But no matter what the law is, liberal judges, like in the US, still find a way to circumvent it.
The equality issue is central to the debate. The right want laws that favour Jews and Zionism and the left want laws that favour equality between Jews and Muslims. That’s the difference between a state of the Jews and a state of all its citizens.
Why is it that the US and the EU can fully accept all Muslim states but not a Jewish state. They demand that Israel be a liberal democracy but make no such demands on the Arab states.
In bitter Knesset debate, justice minister foils opposition bid to enshrine equality into Basic Law, calling it ‘hypocrisy’ amid ongoing talks on judicial compromise
By CARRIE KELLER-LYNN, TOI 31 May 2023, 4:53 pm

Justice Minister Yariv Levin speaks in the Knesset on May 31, 2023. (Screenshot: Twitter; used in accordance with Clause 27a of the Copyright Law)
In a bitter and fiery Knesset speech, Justice Minister Yariv Levin on Wednesday complained that Israel’s top court was skewed by “post-Zionist agendas,” accused the opposition of pursuing subversive policies, and savaged his political opponents for an impasse in negotiations on judicial reform. His predecessor, the National Unity party’s Gideon Sa’ar, said in response that Levin should “get hospitalized.”
Read more…